Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The incidence of seven different dental anomalies in southeastern of Turkey

Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığı

Pages
135–141
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Taurodontism was determined as the least common anomaly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of seven different dental anomalies and tendency to dental anomalies among the sexes living in southeastern of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study was designed on panoramic radiographs of randomly selected 4256 patients that applied to Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry and Adıyaman Oral and Dental Health Center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Taurodontism was determined as the least common anomaly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of seven different dental anomalies and tendency to dental anomalies among the sexes living in southeastern of Turkey. Methods: This retrospective study was designed on panoramic radiographs of randomly selected 4256 patients that applied to Adıyaman University Faculty of Dentistry and Adıyaman Oral and Dental Health Center. Panoramic radiographs of patients were evaluated by two investigators to determine dental anomalies. In the study, seven types of dental anomalies were analyzed statistically on the panoramic radiography images of the patients, including lack of lower incisor, supernumerary tooth, ectopia, impaction, microdontia, taurodontism and dilaseration. Results: The most common anomaly was found to be impaction with a incidence of 4.2%. Taurodontism was found to be a least common anomaly with a incidence of 0.02%. The incidence of impaction was found to be significantly higher in male individuals compared to female. The incidence of ectopic teeth was significantly higher in males than in females. The incidence of lack of lower incisors was found to be significantly higher in females than males. Conclusion: Impaction is the most frequently encountered anomaly in the individuals living in the southeastern of Turkey. Lack of lower incisor was more frequent in females, while impaction and ectopic tooth were more common in males. In addition, there is no statistically difference between the genders in terms of the frequency of anomalies such as supernumerary tooth, dilaseration, taurodontism and microdontia. Taurodontism was determined as the least common anomaly.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde yaşayan bireylerde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığının ve cinsiyetler arasındaki dental anomali görülme yatkınlıkların değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma Adıyaman Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi’ne ve Adıyaman Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Merkezi’ne çeşitli nedenlerle müracat etmiş hastalardan rastgele seçilen 4256 hastaya ait panoramik radyografi görüntüleri üzerinde retrospektif olarak tasarlandı. Hastalara ait panoramik radyografi görüntüleri dental anomalilerin tespit edilmesi amacıyla 2 araştırmacı tarafından değerlendirildi. Çalışmada hastaların panoramik radyografi görüntüleri üzerinde tespit edilen, alt keser diş eksikliği, sürnümerer diş, ektopi, gömülü kalma, mikrodonti, taurodontism ve dilaserasyon olmak üzere 7 tip dental anomali cinsiyetler arası dağılımına göre istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir Bulgular: En sık görülen anomali %4,2 oranıyla gömülü kalma olarak tespit edildi. Taurodontizm % 0,02 lik oranla en az görülen anomali olarak tespit edildi. Gömülü diş görülme sıklığı erkek bireylerde, kadınlara kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha fazla bulunmuştur. Ektopik diş görülme oranı, erkeklerde kadınlara nazaran istatistiksel olarak anlamı derecede fazla bulunmuştur. Kadınlarda alt keser diş eksikliği görülme oranı, erkeklere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede fazla bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde yaşayan bireylerde gömülü kalma, en sık rastlanılan anomali olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Alt keser diş eksikliği kadınlarda daha fazla görülürken, gömülü diş ve ektopiye erkeklerde daha sık rastlanılmıştır. Bunun yanında, sürnümerer diş, dilaserasyon, taurodontizm ve mikrodonti gibi anomalilerin görülme sıklığı bakımından cinsiyetler arasında farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Taurodontizm en az rastlanılan anomali olarak tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOPARAL, M., UNSAL, H. Y., ALAN, H. T., YALÇIN, M., EGE, B., GÜLSÜN, B. (2018). The incidence of seven different dental anomalies in southeastern of Turkey. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 135–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/301584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Brook AH. Multilevel complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol 2009; 54(1): 3-17.
  2. Garib DG, Alencar BM, Lauris JR, Baccetti T. Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors and associated dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(732): 1-6.
  3. Bedoya MM, Park JH. A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 1485-1493
  4. Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 328-335
  5. Guan G, Wang Y, Lo T, Preston B Prevalence of tooth agenesis in orthodontic patient population in Western New York. N Y State Dent J 2013; 79: 31-35.
  6. Küchler EC, Risso PA, Costa Mde C, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of school children. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 941-946.
  7. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 529-535.
  8. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Class II division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 9-20.
  9. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou MN, Komposch G. Congenital tooth anomalies and malocclusions: a genetic link? Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 145-151. Baccetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies,” Angle Orthod 1998; 68(3): 267-274
  10. Abe R, Endo T, Shimooka S. Maxillary first molar agenesis and other dental anomalies. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(6): 1002–1009. Sofaer JA. Human tooth-size asymmetry in cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Arch Oral Biol 1979; 24(2): 141–146
  11. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(3): 436–441.
  12. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van Der Linden FPGM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32(3): 217– 226. Shapira Y, Finkelstein T, Shpack N, Lai YH, Kuftinec MM, Vardimon A. Mandibular second molar impaction. Part I: genetic traits and characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140(1): 32–37.
  13. Ghaznawi H, Daas H, Salako N. A clinical and radiographic survey of selected dental anomalies and conditions in Saudi Arabian population. Saudi Dent J 1999; 11(1): 8–13. Mossey PA. The heritability of malocclusion: part 2. The influence of g