SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2014 / Sayı: 13

-

Mimarlık Öğrencilerinin Perspektif Çizme Başarısı ile Öğrenme Stilleri Arasındaki İlişki

YASEMİN ERKAN YAZICI
Pages
155–168
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that 3 of the students were accomodators, 3 of the studentswere divergers, 2 of the students were convergers and 3 of the students wereassimilators.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the relationship between the learning styles and perspectivedrawing performance of the students enrolled in the Architectural Perspective course inthe Department of Architecture of Istanbul Kultur University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, Kolb’sLearning Style Inventory was used to identify the learning styles of 11 students takingthe course.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that 3 of the students were accomodators, 3 of the studentswere divergers, 2 of the students were convergers and 3 of the students wereassimilators.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between the learning styles and perspectivedrawing performance of the students enrolled in the Architectural Perspective course inthe Department of Architecture of Istanbul Kultur University. For this purpose, Kolb’sLearning Style Inventory was used to identify the learning styles of 11 students takingthe course. It was found that 3 of the students were accomodators, 3 of the studentswere divergers, 2 of the students were convergers and 3 of the students wereassimilators. Drawings obtained from a workshop conducted afterwards were analyzedand compared with the perspective drawing performance of students. Results of thisstudy indicate that there is a significant relationship between the perspective drawingperformance and learning styles of students

Özet

Bu aratırmada, stanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Bölümü, Mimari Perspektif dersinialan örencilerin perspektif çizme baarısı ile örenme stilleri arasındaki ilikinin tespitedilmesi amaçlanmıtır. Bu amaçla, dersi alan 11 örenciye Kolb’un Örenme StiliEnvanteri uygulanmıtır. Elde edilen verilere göre 3 örencinin yerletiren, 3 örencinindeitiren, 2 örencinin ayrıtıran ve 3 örencinin özümseyen örenme stiline sahipolduu tespit edilmitir. Daha sonra yapılan atölye çalıması sonucunda elde edilençizimler analiz edilmi ve örencilerin örenme stilleri ile karılatırılmıtır. Çalımasonunda örencilerin perspektif çizme baarısı ve örenme stilleri arasında anlamlısonuçlar elde edilmitir

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, Y. E. (2014). -. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, Sayı: 13, 155–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/300978

References (13)

  1. Akar, Petek, Buket Akkoyunlu, “Kolb Örenme Stili Envanteri”, Eitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 87, 1993: 37-47.
  2. Cesur, M., Onur,“Üniversite Hazırlık Sınıfı Örencilerinin Yabancı Dil ÖrenmeStratejileri, Örenme Stili Tercihi ve Yabancı Dil Akademik Baarısı Örüntüsü”,Yayınlanmamı doktora tezi, stanbul:Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2008. Yordayıcı likiler Demirbas, O., Osman, Halime Demirkan, “Focus on Architectural Design Process Through Learning Styles”, Design Studies, 24(5), 2003: 437-456.
  3. Ekici, Gülay, Örenme Stiline Dayalı Öretim ve Biyoloji Dersi Öretimine Yönelik Ders Planı Örnekleri, (1. Baskı) Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi, 2003.
  4. Erkan Yazıcı, Yasemin, “Bilisel Farklılıkların ve Mekansal Deneyimlerin lk Yıl Mimarlık Örencilerinin Tasarım Süreçlerine Etkilerinin Aratırılması”, Yayınlanmamı doktora tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi,
  5. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 2010.
  6. Erkan Yazıcı, Yasemin, Gökhan Yazıcı, “The Effect of Learning Styles on the Performance of Architecture Students in Structural Design Courses”, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 2011, 27-29
  7. Nisan, Antalya, 2011: 1677-1681.
  8. Guild, Pat Burke, Stephen Garger,Marching to Different Drummers, ASCD, 2nd, Alexandria, USA, 1998. Hearron,Mary, Carol,The Predictive Effect of Logical Thinking, Prior Knowledge, and Learning Style Characteristics On Academic Achievement in an Anatomy and Physiology Course,USA: East Texas State University, 1991.
  9. Ismail, Yusuf,“A Study of the Relationships Between Achievement Motivation and Learning Styles of a Group of Malaysian Students Attending Northern Illinois University”,USA: Northern Illinois University, Yayınlanmamı Doktora Tezi, 1982.
  10. Kolb, Alice, Y., Kolb, David, A, Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 2005: 193–212.
  11. Kolb, David, A., The Kolb Learning Style Inventory. New Jersey: Hay Resources Direct, 1999.
  12. Kolb, David, A., Experiental Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
  13. Öztuna, Seda, “Bilisel Biçem ile Örenme Biçemi Arasındaki liki”, Ekev Akademi Dergisi, yıl: 17 sayı: 56, 2013: 430. Erkan Yazıcı, Yasemin, Fotoraf 1: Kuzguncuk’da bir sokak, 2013.