Journals / Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2014 / Sayı: 13

POSTMODERN ASSORTMENTS FROM PRUITT IGOE TO PRESENT: A CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION AND REFLECTIONS TO DESIGN

Pruitt Igoe'dan Günümüze Postmodern Çeşitlemeler: Kültürel Dönüşüm ve Tasarıma Yansımalar

Pages
43–60
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to put forward this cultural change into consideration from a critical point of view in the context of design – individual relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:When The Pruitt Igoe housing complex was demolished in 1972, the closing of the modern period was implied with a symbolic expression.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the passing 41 years, postmodernism break its first rebellion, and went the way alone; especially design, architecture and their relationship with the individual strikes very different attitutes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to put forward this cultural change into consideration from a critical point of view in the context of design – individual relationship.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

When The Pruitt Igoe housing complex was demolished in 1972, the closing of the modern period was implied with a symbolic expression. During the passing 41 years, postmodernism break its first rebellion, and went the way alone; especially design, architecture and their relationship with the individual strikes very different attitutes. With the obliteration of frontiers between the elitist culture and pop culture, different perspectives started to occur in the transformative cultural environment of the society, which only tries to seize the presence, and has lost the very essential and true reference points between the history. The aim of this study is to put forward this cultural change into consideration from a critical point of view in the context of design – individual relationship.

Özet

Pruitt Igoe konutları 1972 yılında yıkıldığında, modern dönemin kapanmış olduğu simgesel bir anlatımla ifade edilmişti. Aradan geçen 41 yıl içinde, ilk başkaldırışını aşan postmodernizm kendi yolunu çizdi; özellikle de tasarım, mimari ve birey arasındaki ilişki çok farklı tonlara büründü. Seçkin kültür ve halkçı kültür arasındaki sınırların silinmeye başlaması ile sadece ‘an’ı yaşamaya çalışan ve tarihle arasındaki gerçek referans noktalarını kaybetmeye başlayan toplumun dönüşen kültürel ortamında tasarımda da farklı bakışlar oluşmaya başladı. Bu çalışmanın amacı, oluşan bu kültürel dönüşümün birey ile ilişkisi bağlamında tasarım ile etkileşimini eleştirel bir bakış açısı ile ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, L. (2014). POSTMODERN ASSORTMENTS FROM PRUITT IGOE TO PRESENT: A CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION AND REFLECTIONS TO DESIGN. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, Sayı: 13, 43–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/300951

References (18)

  1. Archer, John, “Social Theory of Space: Architecture and the Production of Self, Culture, and Society”, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 64, No. 4, 2005, s. 430 – 433. Arkaraprasertkul, Non, “On Fredric Jameson: Marxism, Postmodernism, and Architecture”, Architectural Theory, Nisan 1, 2009, s. 79 – 94. Baudrillard, Jean, Simulations: Semiotext(e) Inc., New York, 1983.
  2. Baudrillard, Jean, “The System of Objects” ( 1968),
  3. Design after Modernism, Haz. John Thackara, Thames and Hudson, Londra, 1988.
  4. Baudrillard, Jean, La Societe de Consommation ( 1970),
  5. Tüketim Toplumu, Ayrıntı Yayınları, çev. Hazal Deliçaylı, Ferda Keskin, İstanbul, 1997.
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice, Polity Press,
  7. Cambridge, Çev. Richard Nice, 2003.
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre, Wacquant, Loic, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago Press, 1992, Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji için Cevaplar, İletişim Yayınları, çev: Nazlı Ökten, İstanbul, 2003.
  9. Bristol, Katharine, “The Pruitt-Igoe Myth”, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 44. N. 3, 1984, s 163 -171. Brown, Bill, “The Dark Wood of Postmodernity ( Space, Faith, Allegory )”, Modern Language Association, Vol. 120, No. 3, 2005, s. 734-750.
  10. Chabot, Barry, “The Problem of The Postmodern”, New Literary History, Vol.20, No.1, 1988, s. 1-20.
  11. Comerio, Mary, “Pruitt Igoe and Other Stories”, JAE, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1981, s. 26-31.
  12. Falk, Richard, Ambazs, Emilio, Beeman, William, “PostModernism: The Social Aspect”, Performing Arts Journal, Vol. 5,No. 3, 1981, s. 54 -64. Foster, Hal, “(Post)Modern Polemics”, New German Critique, No.33, Modernity and Postmodernity, 1984, s. 67-78.
  13. Gartman, David, “Postmodernism; or the Cultural Logic of PostFordism”, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol.39, No.1,1998, s. 119-137.
  14. Grudin, Robert, Design and Truth, Sheridan Books, Michigan, 2010.
  15. Gutenschwager, Gerald, “Architecture in a Changing World: The New Rhetoric of Form”, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 49, No.4, 1996, s. 246-258
  16. Huyssen, Andreas, “Postmodernin Haritasını Yapmak”, Vadi Yayınları, haz ve çev. Mehmet Küçük, Modernite Versus Postmodernite, Ankara, 1994. (Yazının orjinali New German Critique’de 1984’te yayımlanmıştır.). Jameson, Fredric, “Postmodernism and Consumer Society”, AntiAesthetic, haz. Hal Foster, Port Townsend, Washington, 1991.
  17. Jencks, Charles, The Language of Postmodern Architecture ( 1977 ), Rizzoli, New York, 1991.
  18. Jencks, Charles, Contextual Counterpoint, Architectural Design, Eylül 1, 2011,s. 62 – 67. Julier, G