Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

THE NEXUS AMONG FISCAL POLICIES, FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: JOINT EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION AND INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY

MALİYE POLİTİKALARI, MALİ YERELLEŞME VE EKONOMİK PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ BAĞ: KÜRESELLEŞME VE KURUMSAL KALİTE ETKİLEŞİMİ

Pages
155–172
Publication Date
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As an additional contribution, panel VARX method is applied to investigate the direction and size of the interaction for the 24 countries that are members of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development between 1996 and 2010

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to reveal not only the individual effects of globalization and institutional quality but also their interaction effects on fiscal decentralization, government spending, tax revenues, and economic performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The role of institutions is important as the underlying basis for economic activity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As an additional contribution, panel VARX method is applied to investigate the direction and size of the interaction for the 24 countries that are members of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development between 1996 and 2010
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mali yerelleşme · küreselleşme · kurumsal kalite

Abstract

This article aims to reveal not only the individual effects of globalization and institutional quality but also their interaction effects on fiscal decentralization, government spending, tax revenues, and economic performance. The role of institutions is important as the underlying basis for economic activity. Institutional quality should include an analysis of the impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic variables to determine the dynamics of economic structure. There are not enough studies that deal with the interaction effect of globalization and institutional quality within this concept. As an additional contribution, panel VARX method is applied to investigate the direction and size of the interaction for the 24 countries that are members of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development between 1996 and 2010

Özet

Bu makale, küreselleşmenin ve kurumsal kalitenin sadece bireysel etkilerini değil aynı zamanda birlikte etkileşimlerinin mali yerelleşme, kamu harcamaları, vergi gelirleri ve ekonomik performans üzerindeki etkilerini de ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Kurumlar, ekonomik faaliyetin temel unsurlarındandır. Mali yerelleşmenin makroekonomik değişkenler üzerindeki etkisi incelenirken ekonomik yapının dinamiklerinin belirlenebilmesi için kurumsal kalitenin de incelenmesi gereklidir. Bu kapsamda, küreselleşmenin ve kurumsal kalitenin birlikte etkisini ele alan çalışmalar literatürde yeteri kadar bulunmamaktadır. Literatüre ek bir katkı olarak, 1996-2010 dönemleri arasında Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Örgütü üyesi olan 24 ülke için etkileşimin yönü ve boyutu panel VARX yöntemiyle araştırılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

TERZİOĞLU, M. K. (2018). THE NEXUS AMONG FISCAL POLICIES, FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: JOINT EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION AND INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 155–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/3006

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abrigo, M. R.M. and Love, I. (2015). Estimation of Panel Vector Autoregression in Stata: a Package of Programs Alfaro, L., Kalemli-Ozcan, S. & Volosovych, V. (2008). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 347–368.
  2. Alesina, A. & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are Stabilizations Delayed? The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1170-1188.
  3. Andrews, D.W.K. &Lu B. (2001). Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 101(1), 123– 164. Bahl, R. & Linn J. (1992). Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bahl, R. (1999). “Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy,” Public Budgeting and Finance, 19, 59–75. Breton A. & Scott, A. (1978). The Economic Constitution of Federal States, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  5. Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments. An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bolton, P., & Roland, G. (1997). The breakup of nations: A political-economy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1057–1090.
  7. Canova, F., & Ciccarelli, M. (2009).
  8. Estimating multicountry VAR models, International Economic Review, 50, 929–959.
  9. Canova, F., & Ciccarelli, M. (2013). Panel vector autoregressive models: A survey, Working Paper Series, 1507. Chang, C. P., & Lee, C.C. (2010). Globalization and economic growth: A political economy analysis for OECD countries. Global Economic Review, 39(2), 151–173.
  10. Cukierman, A., Webb, S.B. & Neyapti, B. (1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effects on policy outcomes. World Bank Economic Review, 6(3), 353–398.
  11. Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. 1998. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study, Journal of Urban Economics (U.S), 43, 244– 257. Dreher, A. (2006a). The influence of globalization on autonomous taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 179– 201. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalization - Gauging its Consequence, New York: Springer. Ermini, B., & Santolini, R. (2010). Fiscal decentralization and globalization: evidence from KOF index of globalization. Mimeo. Evans, R.W. (2007). Is openness inflationary? Imperfect competition and monetary market power. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Insti