Journals / Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (. e-Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi) / 2009 / Sayı: 43

The Determination of The Application Level and Applicability of Target Costing in The Turkish Manufacturing (ICI 500) Companies

Hedef Maliyetlemenin Türk İmalat İşletmelerinde (İSO 500) Uygulanma Düzeyi ve Uygulanabilirliğinin Tespitine İlişkin Bir Araştırma- – 2

Pages
24–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of the study is to reveal the basic differences between those companies which apply target costing and those which do not apply, in terms of applicability and application level and to analyze applicability of the technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rapid developments in technology, change in customer expectations, shortening product life cycles and especially increasing global competition force the companies reach the targets of “low cost, short time and high quality” at the same time and the highest level possible.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the most important of these methods is “Target Costing”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of the study is to reveal the basic differences between those companies which apply target costing and those which do not apply, in terms of applicability and application level and to analyze applicability of the technique.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Rapid developments in technology, change in customer expectations, shortening product life cycles and especially increasing global competition force the companies reach the targets of “low cost, short time and high quality” at the same time and the highest level possible. Therefore, companies utilize the modern management accounting techniques in achieving these goals. One of the most important of these methods is “Target Costing”. The ampirical study conducted in this paper about target costing is a statistical-descriptive research covering the years 2007 and 2008. The companies within this study are selected from the top 500 manufacturing companies listed in Istanbul Chamber Of Industry (ICI) 2006 index. The aim of the study is to reveal the basic differences between those companies which apply target costing and those which do not apply, in terms of applicability and application level and to analyze applicability of the technique.

Özet

Teknolojide yaşanan hızlı gelişim, değişen müşteri beklentileri, kısalan ürün yaşam dönemleri ve özellikle son yıllarda artan küresel rekabet, işletmeleri “düşük maliyet, kısa zaman ve yüksek kalite” hedeflerini aynı anda ve en yüksek düzeyde gerçekleştirmek zorunda bırakmaktadır. Bu nedenle, işletmeler belirtilen hedeflere ulaşmada modern yönetim muhasebesi tekniklerinden yararlanmaktadır. Bu tekniklerden biriside “Hedef Maliyetleme (Target Costing)” dir. Hedef maliyetleme tekniği ile ilgili olarak bu çalışmada yapılan araştırma, 2007-2008 yıllarını kapsayan istatistiki-tanımlayıcı nitelikte bir araştırma olup; amacı İstanbul Sanayi Odası (İSO) tarafından belirlenmiş olan 2006 yılına ait ilk 500 sanayi işletmesi arasında hedef maliyetlemenin uygulanabilirliği ile uygulanma düzeyi açısından uygulayan işletmelerle uygulamayan işletmeler arasındaki temel farkları belirleyerek uygulanabilirliğini ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAZITLI, E., KOÇSOY, M. (2009). The Determination of The Application Level and Applicability of Target Costing in The Turkish Manufacturing (ICI 500) Companies. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (. e-Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi), Sayı: 43, 24–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/299737

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. ANSARI, Shahid L., Jan E. BELL ve the CAM-I Target Cost Core Group(1997); Target Costing: The Next Frontier in Strategic Cost Management, A CAM-I/CMS Model for Profit Planning and Cost Management, IRWIN Professional Publishing, 1997,
  2. USA, ISBN: 1-932301.
  3. ANSARI, Shahid, Janice BELL, Dan SWENSON (2006); “A Template for Implementing Target Costing”, Cost Management, September/October 2006, ss. 20-27.
  4. BONZEMBA, Ekutu L., Hiroshi OKANO(1998); “The Effects of Target Costing Implementation on an Organizational Culture in France”, Second Asian-Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Account-ing Conference Program, 4th - 6th August 1998, ss. 1-30, http://www3.bus.osaka-cu.ac.jp/apira98/ archives/pdfs/70.pdf (30.11.2005).
  5. BRAXTON, Peter J., Richard L. COLEMAN, Tami L. CAPPERAULD, Dan W. SWENSON, Cari L. PULLEN, CAM-I Cost Management Systems (CMS); “Target Costing Best Practices and Implications for CAIV Implementation”, http://www.cam-i.org/cms_groups/tc.htm (10.10.2007).
  6. COOPER, Robin, Regine SLAGMULDER(1997);
  7. Target Costing and Value Engineering, Instıtute of Management Accountants, Productivity Press,
  8. Portland, Oregon, USA, 1997.
  9. CORRIGAN, John(1996); “Target Costing-A new approach”, Australian Accountant, 66, 3, Apr 1996, ABI/INFORM Global, ss. 53-54.
  10. FEIL, Patrick, Keun-Hyo YOOK, Il-Woon KIM(2004); “Japanese Target Costing: A Historical Perspective”, International Journal of Strategic Cost Management, Spring 2004, ss. 10-19.
  11. HILTON, Ronald W.(2005); Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Enviorement, Sixth Edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2005.
  12. HILTON, Ronald W., Michael W. MAHER, Frank H. SELTO(2003); Cost Management: Strategies for Business Decisions, Second Edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2003.
  13. HORNGREN, Charles T., George FOSTER, Sri-kant M. DATAR(1994);
  14. Cost Accounting, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1994.
  15. KULMALA, Harri I., Jari PARANKO, Matti SIEVANEN, Petri SUOMALA, Katja TORNBERG; “Cost Perspectives of Product Development”, ss. 1-8, http://www.im.tut.fi/cmc (09.08.2007).
  16. KURUNSAARI, Hannu, Frank ROEVEKAMP, Hiroshi OKANO(2003); “The Eco-Check in Relation to Target Costing in Ecodesigning: The Resource-Based View”, Eco Design, 2003/2A-3, ss. 314-320.
  17. LEE, John Y.(1994); “Use target costing to improve your bottom-line”, The CPA Journal, 64, 1, Jan 1994, ss. 68-70.
  18. LEE, John Y., Yasuhiro MONDEN(1996); “An International Comparison of Manufacturing Friendly Cost Management Systems”, The International