Journals / Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (. e-Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi) / 2010 / Sayı: 46

The partnership concentration on the companies operating in Istanbul Stock Exchange and the effects on the firms performance

İMKB'de işlem gören şirketlerde ortaklık yoğunlaşmasının firma performansı üzerine etkileri

Pages
216–231
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, those have been determined that concentration has affected ROA and TobQ; board of directors’ size has affected ROA and TobQ and the three major partner’s share has affected TobQ positively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consist of concentrated and unconcentrated ownership structures which are depending on distribution of equity between shareholders are formed in company.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ownership structures are expected to have impact on company performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, those have been determined that concentration has affected ROA and TobQ; board of directors’ size has affected ROA and TobQ and the three major partner’s share has affected TobQ positively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Consist of concentrated and unconcentrated ownership structures which are depending on distribution of equity between shareholders are formed in company. The ownership structures are expected to have impact on company performance. In order to examine the impacts of different ownership structure on company performance, regression analysis has been used with 113 companies’ data operating in the period 1996-2009 in Istanbul Stock Exchange. In the analysis ROA, ROE and Net Profit Margin have been used as performance variables; concentration, board of directors’ size and the proportion of three major partner’s share have been used as concentration variables. Those have been determined in the analysis results that generally sales size and profit growth have affected all dependent variables positively; leverage, short-term debt ratio, operating risk and sales structure negatively. Moreover, those have been determined that concentration has affected ROA and TobQ; board of directors’ size has affected ROA and TobQ and the three major partner’s share has affected TobQ positively.

Özet

İşletmelerde öz sermayenin ortaklar arasındaki dağılımına bağlı olarak yoğunlaşmış ve yoğunlaşmamış ortaklık yapıları oluşmaktadır. Bu ortaklık yapılarının firma performansı üzerinde etkili olması beklenir. Bu çalışmada ortaklık yoğunlaşmasının firma performansı üzerine etkisini incelemek amacıyla 1996–2009 döneminde İMKB’de faaliyet gösteren 113 şirket verisinden hareketle regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Analizde performans değişkeni olarak ROA, ROE, TobQ ve Net Kar Marjı alınırken, yoğunlaşma değişkeni olarak da yoğunluk, yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü ve üç büyük ortağın payı alınmıştır. Analiz sonucunda genel olarak, satış büyüklüğü ve kar büyümesinin tüm bağımlı değişkenleri pozitif yönlü etkilediği; kaldıraç, kısa vadeli borç oranı, faaliyet riski ve satış yapısını ise negatif yönlü etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca yoğunluk değişkeninin aktif getirisini ve TobQ’yu, yönetim kurulu büyüklüğünün aktif getirisini ve TobQ’yu, üç büyük ortağın payının ise TobQ’yu pozitif yönde etkilediği de tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANRIÖVEN, C., AKSOY, E. E. (2010). The partnership concentration on the companies operating in Istanbul Stock Exchange and the effects on the firms performance. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (. e-Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi), Sayı: 46, 216–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/299728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. A. Shleifer ve R. Vihny: “ A Survey of Corporate Governance”, Journal of Finance, 1997, 52., 737-783. Andrea Shleifer ve Robert W. Vishny: “Large Shareholders And Corporate Control”, Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94., s.461-488. B. Burçin Yurtoğlu: “ Corporate Governance And Implication For Minority Shareholders In Turkey”, Journal of Corporate Ownership And Control, 2003, 1.,1, 72-86. Beni Lauterbach ve A. Vaninsky: “ Ownership Structure And Firm Performance: Evidence From Israel”, Journal of Management And Governance, 1999, 3., 189-201. Benjamin Maury ve Anete Pajuste: “ Multiple Large Shareholders And Firm Value”, 2005, Journal of Banking and Finance, 29., 1813-1834.
  2. Chung, K.H ve S.W. Pruitt.1994.“A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s Q”, Financial Management: 23(3) 70-74. Erik Lehmann ve Jürgen Weigand: “ Does The Governed Corporation Perform Beter? Governance Sutructures And Corporate Performance In Germany”, 2000, European Finance Review, 4., 157-195. F. Eugene Brigham ve C. Louis Gapenski: Intermadiate Financial Management, 1996,
  3. Fifth Edition,
  4. Orlando, The Dryden Pres, s.16. Güner Gürsoy ve Kürşat Aydoğan: “ Equity Ownership Structure, Risk taking And Performance: An Empirical Investigation In Turkish Companies”, International Global Finance Conference, İstanbul 1998. Harold Demsetz ve Kennet Lehn: “ The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes And Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93, s.1155-1177. Harold Demsetz: “The Firm In Economic Theory: A Quite Resolution”, 1997, 87(2), s.426- 429 İstemi Demirağ ve Mehmet Serter: “ Ownership Patterns And Control In Turkish Listed Companies”, Corporate Governance,2002, 11, 1., 40-51.
  5. M. Burkart, D. Gromb ve F. Panunzi: “ Large Shareholders, Monitoring And Value of The Firm”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997,112(3) Mehmet Saraç: “ An Emprical Analysis of Corporate Ownership Structure In Turkish Manufacturing Sector”, 6thEuropean Business History Association Annual Congress In Helsinki, 2002. P. Kuznetsov ve A. Muravyev: “ Ownership Structure And Firm Performance In Russia: The Case of Blue Chips of Stock Market”, Working Paper Şeref Kalaycı, SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikler, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, İkinci Baskı, Ankara 2006, s. 264. Vitality Zheka: “ Corporate Governance, Ownership Structure And Corporate Efficiency: The Case of Ukraine”, Master Thesis, National University of Kyiv Academy, 2003 Xiaonian Xu ve Yan Wang: “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance And Firm