Journals / Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni / 2004 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Species and biovar distribution of Brucella isolates in Trakya University Hospital between 1997-2002

Trakya Üniversitesi Hastanesinde 1997-2002 yılları arasında saptanan Brucella izolatlarının tür biyovar dağılımı

Pages
187–191
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Forty two (89.4%) of B.melitensis isolates were biovar 3, and five (10.6%) were biovar 1, while the single isolate of B.abortus was identified as an atypical strain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the species and biovar distribution of Brucella spp. isolated from blood cultures in Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of Trakya University Hospital, between 1997-2002.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 48 Brucella spp. have been isolated from 14.815 patients (0.3%), and the strains were identified according to C02 requirement, H2S production, basic fuchsin and thionin sensitivity, lysis by Tbilisi phages, and presence of agglutination with monospecific A and M antisera.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Forty two (89.4%) of B.melitensis isolates were biovar 3, and five (10.6%) were biovar 1, while the single isolate of B.abortus was identified as an atypical strain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Brucella · Bakteriyel tiplendirme teknikleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the species and biovar distribution of Brucella spp. isolated from blood cultures in Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of Trakya University Hospital, between 1997-2002. A total of 48 Brucella spp. have been isolated from 14.815 patients (0.3%), and the strains were identified according to C02 requirement, H2S production, basic fuchsin and thionin sensitivity, lysis by Tbilisi phages, and presence of agglutination with monospecific A and M antisera. As a result, 47 (97.9%) isolates were identified as B.melitensis, and one as B.abortus (2.1%). Forty two (89.4%) of B.melitensis isolates were biovar 3, and five (10.6%) were biovar 1, while the single isolate of B.abortus was identified as an atypical strain.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Laboratuvan'nda kan kültüründen izole edilen Brucella türleri ve biyotiplerinin saptanması amaçlanmıştır. 1997-2002 yılları arasında 14.815 hastadan yapılan kan kültürünün 48'inden (%0.3) Brucella cinsi bakteriler üretilmiştir. Bu bakteriler, C02 ihtiyacı, H2S yapımı, tiyonin ve bazik fuksine duyarlılık,, Tbilisi fajı ile lizis ve monospesifik A ve M antiserumları ile aglütinasyon sonuçlarına göre değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, izolatların 47'sinin (%97.9) B.melitensis, birinin (%2.1) 6.abortus olduğu saptanmıştır. Kırk iki (%89.4) B.melitensis izolatının biyovar3, beşinin (%10.6) ise biyovar 1 olduğu belirlenmiş, tanımlanan tek B.abortus susunun ise atipik bir izolat olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULOĞLU, F., GÜRBİLEK, S. E., AKATA, F., TANSEL, Ö., GÜRCAN, Ş., TUĞRUL, H. M. (2004). Species and biovar distribution of Brucella isolates in Trakya University Hospital between 1997-2002. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 187–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/299412

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Young EJ An overview of human brucellosis Clin Infect Dis 1995, 21: 283-290
  2. Corbel MJ: Brucellosis: An overview Emerg Infect Dis 1997, 3 213-221 3. Demirözü K, Çelik M, İyisan AS, Özdemir Ü. Erdenliğ S: Trakya Bölgesi'nde brucellosıs'ın seroepidemıyolojisi. Pendik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 1996, 27 79-100 4. Chu MC, Weyant RS: Francisella and Brucella. p: 797-808. In. Murray PR (ed), Manual of Clinical Microbiology 2003, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington DC
  3. Alton GG, Jones LM. Angus RD, Verger JM: Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, 1988
  4. Erdenliğ S, Şen A Koyun atıklarından Brucella cinsi mikroorganizmaların izolasyonu ve biyotiplendirilmesi. Pendik Vet Mikrobiol Derg 2000, 31: 31-42
  5. Bolca Z, Gündeş S, Erdenliğ S ve ark: H. insan kaynaklı Brucella türü mikroorganizmaların tiplendirilmesi amacı ile uygulanan metodların karşılaştırılması ve biyotipleri ile faj tipleri arasındaki ilişkinin irdelenmesi. Flora 2002, 7: 157-170
  6. Yagupsky P: Detection of Brucellae in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1999, 37: 3437-3442
  7. Tansel Ö, Yavuz M, Kuloğlu F, Akata F: Trakya Üniversitesi Hastanesine başvuran 40 bruselloz olgusunun değerlendirilmesi, infeks Derg 2003, 17: 1-4
  8. Office International des Epizooties (World Organisation for Animal Health). Annual Animal Health Situation, http://www.oie.int/ Updated: 17/11/03
  9. Bodur H, Balaban N, Aksaray S, et al. Biotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Brucella isolates. Scand J Infect Dis 2003, 35: 337-338
  10. Erdenliğ S: Türkiye'de Brucella kökenleri. Klimik Derg 2003, 16 (özel sayı): 214-216
  11. Taleski V, Zerva L, Kantardjiev T, et al: An overview of the epidemiology and epizootology of brucellosis in selected countries of Central and Southeast Europe. Vet Microbiol 2002, 90: 147-155
  12. Cokca F, Meco O, Arasil E, Unlu A: An intramedullary dermoid cyst abscess due to Brucella abortus biotype 3 at T11-L2 spinal levels. Infection 1994, 22 359-360
  13. Refai M: Incidence and control of brucellosis in the Near East region. Vet Microbiol 2002, 90: 81-110.