Journals / Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4

Molecular typing of adenoviruses isolated from clinical specimens by PCR and DNA sequencing methods

Klinik örneklerden izole edilen adenovirusların PCR ve DNA dizi analizi yöntemiyle tiplendirilmesi

Pages
607–613
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, advanced studies with large number of specimens are necessary to achive a reliable, detailed national adenovirus database.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Adenoviruses are responsible for a broad spectrum of diseases, including upper and lower respiratory tract infections (URTIs and LRTIs, respectively), conjunctivitis, gastroenteritis, and hemorrhagic cystitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 22 AdV strains isolated between January 1st 2011 to May 31th 2011, from various samples (295 nasopharyngeal swabs, 42 conjunctival swabs, 13 stool) sent to our routine virology laboratory were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, advanced studies with large number of specimens are necessary to achive a reliable, detailed national adenovirus database.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Adenoviruses are responsible for a broad spectrum of diseases, including upper and lower respiratory tract infections (URTIs and LRTIs, respectively), conjunctivitis, gastroenteritis, and hemorrhagic cystitis. The aim of this study was to determine the adenovirus (AdV) types isolated from clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing methods. A total of 22 AdV strains isolated between January 1st 2011 to May 31th 2011, from various samples (295 nasopharyngeal swabs, 42 conjunctival swabs, 13 stool) sent to our routine virology laboratory were included in the study. Of the 22 patients whose samples yielded adenovirus positivity, 8 were adult (4 were male; median age: 32.5 years) and 14 (7 were male; median age: 1 year) were children. Those specimens (14 nasopharyngeal swabs, 7 conjunctival swabs, 1 stool) were obtained from patients with URTIs (n= 6), LRTIs (n= 8), conjunctivitis (n= 7) and gastroenteritis (n= 1). For the isolation and identification of adenoviruses, rapid (shell vial) cell culture and direct immunofluorescence antibody methods were used, respectively. Molecular typing of adenoviruses were performed by PCR and sequencing of a partial region (hipervariable region 1-6) of the hexon gene. PCR primers (Adhex F1, Adhex R1) used for DNA amplification were from those described by Lu and Erdman, previously. If insufficient DNA was amplified from the first reaction for sequencing, a nested PCR was performed using Adhex F2 and Adhex R2 primers. Sequencing was performed using the amplification primers and Sequence Reagent Mix-DYEnamic ET Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc, USA) on ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). Obtained adenovirus sequences were typed by BLAST analysis and three AdV types namely type 3, 4, and 8 were identified. In our study, AdV type 3 was detected in a gastroenteritis case and six cases with URTIs and LRTIs (n= 7, 31.8%). AdV type 8 was identified as the cause of conjunctivitis in seven patients and of URTIs and LRTIs in five patients (n= 12, 54.5%). AdV type 4 was found to be associated with URTI in one, and LRTIs in two patients (n= 3; 13.7%). Our data indicated that AdV type 8 was the most prevalent type in patients with conjunctivitis and URTIs, while AdV type 3 was the most prevalent type in patients with LRTI. BLAST analysis was thought to be useful for the molecular typing of adenoviruses. In conclusion, advanced studies with large number of specimens are necessary to achive a reliable, detailed national adenovirus database.

Özet

Adenoviruslar, üst ve alt solunum yolu enfeksiyonları (sırasıyla ÜSYE ve ASYE), konjunktivit, gastroen-terit ve hemorajik sistit gibi çeşitli enfeksiyon hastalıklarının etkeni olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, klinik örneklerden izole edilen adenovirusların polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (PCR) ve DNA dizi analizi yöntemi kullanılarak tiplendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya, 01 Ocak 2011-31 Mayıs 2011 tarihleri arasında rutin viroloji laboratuvarımıza gönderilen çeşitli klinik örneklerden (295 nazofarengeal sürüntü, 42 konjunktival sürüntü, 13 dışkı) izole edilen 22 adenovirus (AdV) suşu dahil edilmiştir. Pozitif örnekler(14 nazofarengeal sürüntü, 7 konjunktival sürüntü, 1 dışkı), ASYE (n= 8), ÜSYE (n= 6), konjunktivit (n=7) ve gastroenterit (n= 1) klinik tablolarıyla başvuran sekizi erişkin (dördü erkek; medyan yaş: 32.5 yıl), 14’ü çocuk (yedisi erkek; medyan yaş: 1 yıl) hastaya aittir. Hızlı (shell vial) hücre kültürü yöntemiyle izole edilen ve direkt immünfloresan antikor yöntemiyle tanımlanan AdV pozitif örnekler, hekzon geninin “hipervariable region 1-6”yı hedefleyen PCR ve DNA dizi analizi yöntemiyle tiplendirilmiştir. Viral DNA amplifikasyonu Lu ve Erdman’ın tanımladığı PCR primerleri (Adhex F1, Adhex R1) kullanılarak yapılmış; ilk reaksiyonda dizi analizi için yeterli ürün elde edilmediğinde Adhex F2 ve Adhex R2 primerleri ile “nes-ted” PCR uygulanmıştır. Dizi analizi, amplifikasyon primerleri ve Sequence Reagent Mix-DYEnamic ET Terminator Cycle Sequencing kiti (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc, ABD) kullanılarak ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer cihazında (Applied Biosystems, ABD) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen AdV DNA dizilerinin BLAST analiziyle tiplendirilmesi sonunda, serotip 3, 4 ve 8 olmak üzere üç farklı tip saptanmıştır. Çalışmamızda, biri gastroenterit, altısı ÜSYE ve ASYE olan toplam 7 (%31.8) hastanın AdV tip 3; yedisi kon-junktivit, beşi ÜSYE ve ASYE olan toplam 12 (%54.5) hastanın AdV tip 8; biri ÜSYE ve ikisi ASYE olan 3(%13.7) hastanın ise AdV tip 4 ile enfekte olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada, AdV tip 8, konjunktivit ve ÜSYE olan hastalarda, AdV tip 3 ise ASYE olan hastalarda en sık saptanan tipler olmuştur. Adenovirusların moleküler tiplendirmesinde BLAST analizinin en uygun yöntemlerden birisi olduğu düşünülmüştür. Ülkemizde, daha fazla örnek sayısı ile adenovirus enfeksiyonlarında tiplerin belirlenmesine yönelik çalışmaların yapılması, ulusal epidemiyolojik verilerin birikmesi açısından önem taşımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, C., ŞANLIDA, T., AKÇALI, S., SAYAN, M., YALAZ, M., METİN, D. Y. (2012). Molecular typing of adenoviruses isolated from clinical specimens by PCR and DNA sequencing methods. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4, 607–613. https://ajindex.com/articles/298729

References (14)

  1. Shimada Y, Ariga T, Tagawa Y, Aoki K, Ohno S, Ishiko H. Molecular diagnosis of human adenoviruses d and e by a phylogeny-based classification method using a partial hexon sequence. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(4): 1577-84
  2. Sarantis H, Johnson G, Brown M, Petric M, Tellier R. Comprehensive detection and serotyping of human adenoviruses by PCR and sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(9): 3963-9
  3. Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Long SS, McMillan JA (eds). Adenovirus infections, pp: 211-2. In: Redbook: 2006 Infection Diseases Board Report. 2006, 27 th ed. American Academy of Paediatrics, IL
  4. Rojas LJ, Jaramillo CA, Mojica MF, Escalante MP, Delgado P. Molecular typing of adenovirus circulating in a Colombian paediatric population with acute respiratory infection. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 140(5): 818-22
  5. Lu X, Erdman DD. Molecular typing of human adenoviruses by PCR and sequencing of a partial region of the hexon gene. Arch Virol 2006; 151(8): 1587-602
  6. Swenson PD, Wadell G, Allard A, Hierholzer JC. Adenoviruses, pp: 1404-17. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH (eds), Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 2003, 8 th ed. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC
  7. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25(17): 3389-402
  8. Xie L, Yu XF, Sun Z, et al. Two adenovirus serotype 3 outbreaks associated with febrile respiratory disease and pharyngoconjunctival fever in children under 15 years of age in Hangzhou, China during 2011. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50(6): 1879-88
  9. Mandelboim M, Dror P, Azar R, Bromberg M, Mendelson E. Adenovirus infections in hospitalized patients in Israel: epidemiology and molecular characterization. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49(2): 597-601
  10. Gomes SA, Candeias JA, Monteiro SP, Pereira HG, Niel C. New genome types of adenovirus types 1, 3, and 5 isolated from stools of children in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27(5): 1022-6
  11. Gray GC, McCarthy T, Lebeck MG, et al. Genotype prevalence and risk factors for severe clinical adenovirus infection, United States 2004-2006. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45(9): 1120-31
  12. Wigand R. Pitfalls in the identification of adenoviruses. J Virol Methods 1987; 16(3): 161-9
  13. Yağci R, Akçali A, Yagci S, et al. Molecular identification of adenoviral conjunctivitis in Turkey. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 20(4): 669-74
  14. Ersoy Y, Otlu B, Türkçüoğlu P, Yetkin F, Aker S, Kuzuc