Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2015 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Etiological and Demographic Analysis of Evisceration and Enucleation Cases

Eviserasyon ve Enükleasyon Yapılan Olgularda Etyolojik ve Demografik Özellikler

Pages
229–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that immediate replacement of implants following the surgery decreases the psychological trauma and physical disability of patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Etiological and demographic analysis of evisceration and enucleation cases in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent evisceration or enucleation surgery in our clinic between January 2006 and December 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that immediate replacement of implants following the surgery decreases the psychological trauma and physical disability of patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Etiological and demographic analysis of evisceration and enucleation cases in our clinic. Material and Method: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent evisceration or enucleation surgery in our clinic between January 2006 and December 2014. Evisceration was performed in 40 cases and enucleation was performed in 9 cases. All cases were evaluated according to their ages, sex, surgical indication and post surgical complications. Results: Twenty-five (51%) of 49 patients were male, 24 (49%) of female. The mean age of the patients was 49.9±22.4 (9-90) years. Trauma (27 cases, 55%) was the most common cause of the evisceration. Second most common cause for evisceration surgery was endophthalmitis (8 cases, 16%) followed by absolute glaucoma (5 cases, 10%). In enucleation group, the most common cause of surgery was malignant tumors of the eye, and trauma was the second. As the complications, in three cases of evisceration, implant exposure was observed. No complication was observed after enucleation surgery. Conclusion: We observed that perforating eye trauma, endophthalmitis, and absolute glaucoma are the most frequent indications for evisceration. Malign eye tumors and trauma are the most frequent indications for enucleation. To obtain the most functional and cosmetic appearance, and to avoid complications and deformities meticulous surgery must be performed. We believe that immediate replacement of implants following the surgery decreases the psychological trauma and physical disability of patients.

Özet

Amaç: Kliniğimizde yapılan eviserasyon ve enükleasyon olgularının etyolojik ve demografik özelliklerini incelemek.Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2006- Aralık 2014 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde eviserasyon ve enükleasyon ameliyatı yapılan olguların dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Eviserasyon yapılan 40 olgu ve enükleasyon yapılan 9 olgu çalışmaya alındı. Olguların yaş, cinsiyet dağılımı, ameliyat endikasyonları ve cerrahi sonrası komplikasyonları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Cerrahi işlem uygulanan 49 hastanın 25'i (%51) erkek, 24'ü (%49) kadındı. Olguların yaş ortalaması 49,9±22,4 yıl idi.Eviserasyon uygulanan olguların etyolojilerine bakıldığında en sık neden travma (27 olgu, %55) idi. Bunu; endoftalmi (8 olgu, %16) ve absolü glokom (5 olgu, %10) izlemekteydi. Enükleasyon yapılan olgularda en sık neden malign göz içi tümörü iken bunu travma takip etmekteydi. Komplikasyon olarak eviserasyon yapılan 3 olguda (%6) sfer atılması mevcut iken, enükleasyon yapılan olguların hiçbirinde komplikasyongelişmedi.Sonuç: Özellikle delici göz travmaları, endoftalmi ve absolü glokom gibi nedenler eviserasyona, malign göz içi tümörleri ve travma enükleasyona yol açan önemli etyolojik nedenler olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Cerrahi işlem, en iyi fonksiyonel ve kozmetik sonuca ulaşmak,komplikasyon ve deformitelerden kaçınmak için titizlikle yapılmalıdır. Cerrahi bitiminde protez konulması hastaların erken dönemde yaşadıkları psikolojik travma ve fiziksel engellilik gibi sorunları azalttığı kanaatindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEBERİK, K., KAYA, M., ESKİ, M. T., SAĞLAM, H. (2015). Etiological and Demographic Analysis of Evisceration and Enucleation Cases. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 229–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/297154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Soares IP, França VP. Evisceration and Enucleation. Semin Ophthalmol 2010;25:94-7
  2. Kord Valeshabad A, Naseripour M, Asghari R, Parhizgar SH, Parhizgar SE, Taghvael M, et al. Enucleation and evisceration: in- dications, complications and clinicopathological correlations. Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7:677-80
  3. Şahin A, Erşan İ, Adam M, Oltulu R, Zengin N. Kliniğimizde Evissere Edilen Olguların Demografik Özellikleri ve Evisse ras - yon Endikasyonları. T Klin J Ophthalmol 2008;17:7-10.
  4. Geirsdottir A, Agnarsson BA, Helgadottir G, Sigurdsson H. Enucleation in Iceland 1992- 2004: study in a defined population. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:121-5.
  5. Hansen AB, Petersen C, Heegaard S, Prause JU. Review of 1028 bulbar eviscerations and enucleations. Changes in aetiology and frequency over a 20-year period. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77:331-5.
  6. Dada T, Ray M, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. A study of the indica- tions and changing trends of evisceration in north India. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002;30:120-3.
  7. Laura T. Phan, Thomas N. Hwang, and Timothy J. McCulley. Evisceration in the Modern Age. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2012;19:24-33.
  8. Kaya M, Kulaçoğlu DN, Baykal O, Tüfekçi A, Energin F. 688 ol- guda perforan göz travmaları. T Klin Oft 1998;7:120-3
  9. Dresner SC, Karesh JW. Primary implant placement with eviscer- ation in patients with endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 2000;107: 1661-5.
  10. Kostick DA, Linberg JV. Evisceration with hydroxyapatiteim- plant. Surgical technique and review of 31 case reports. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1542-9.
  11. Levine MR, Pou CR, Lash RH. The 1998 Wendell Hughes Lectu - re. Evisceration: is sympathetic ophthalmia a concern in the new millennium? Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;15:4-8.
  12. Green WR, Maumenee AE, Sanders TE, Smith ME. Sympathetic uveitis following evisceration. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Oto - laryn gol 1972;76:625-44.
  13. Gürdal C, Erdener U, Irkeç M, Orhan M. Incidence of sympa- thetic ophthalmia after penetrating eye injury and choice of treat- ment. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2002;10:223-7.
  14. Goiato MC, Haddad MF, dos Santos DM, Pesqueira AA, Ribeiro Pdo P, Moreno A. Orbital implants insertion to improve ocular prostheses motility. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:870-75 Sherman DD. Current techniques of enucleation and evisceration. In: Daniel MA ed. Ophthalmic Surgery: Principles and Techniques. 1sted. New York: Black well Science, 1999:1565-88.
  15. Toh T, Bevin TH, Molteno AC. Scleral wrap increases the long- term complication risk of bone-derived hydroxyapatite orbital im- pl