Journals / Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (. e-Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi) / 2004 / Sayı: 24

New Performance Measurement Systems in Organizations

İşletmelerde Yeni Performans Ölçümleme Sistemleri

Pages
73–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper concludes that the main differences between "the Balanced Scorecard" and "the Tableau de Bord"

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the performance measurement systems; the Balanced Scorecard and the 'Tableau de Bord." The Balanced Scorecard is a model which integrates financial and non-financial strategic measures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The scorecard translates the vision and strategy into objectives and measures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper concludes that the main differences between "the Balanced Scorecard" and "the Tableau de Bord"
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper examines the performance measurement systems; the Balanced Scorecard and the 'Tableau de Bord." The Balanced Scorecard is a model which integrates financial and non-financial strategic measures. The scorecard translates the vision and strategy into objectives and measures. The Balanced Scorecard can also considerate as a strategic management control tool. The Balanced Scorecard which translates an organization's strategic objectives into a set of performance indicators has four perspectives; Financial- Customer - Internal Business Process - Learning and Growth. The "Tableau de Bord" was introduced in France and has been used for at least 50 years The Tableau de Bord is a set of dashboard measures includes both financial and non financial strategic measures. This paper concludes that the main differences between "the Balanced Scorecard" and "the Tableau de Bord"

Özet

Bu makale, performans Ölçümleme sistemleri olan Balanced Scorecard ve Tableau de Bord'u incelemektedir.Balanced Scorecard, finansal ve finansal olmayan stratejik ölçüleri birleştiren bir modeldir. Scorecard,vizyon ve stratejiyi ölçü ve amaçlara çevirmektedir. Bu sistem aynı zamanda stratejik yönetim kontrol tekniği olarakta kabul edilebilir. Organizasyonun stratejik amaçlarını performans gösterge setine dönüştüren Balanced Scorecard'ın dört temel perspektifi vardır. Bunlar, Finansal-Müşteri-içsel İş Süreçleri-Öğrenme ve Gelişmedir. Tableau de Bord, Fransa'da ortaya çıkmış ve 50 yıldır kullanılan bir sistemdir. Tableau de Bord, finansal ve finansal olmayan ölçülerden oluşan bir kumanda paneli ölçü setidir. Bu makale, Balanced Scorecard ile Tableau de Bord arasında temel benzerlik ve farklılıkları da içermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAMAN, B. A. (2004). New Performance Measurement Systems in Organizations. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (. e-Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi), Sayı: 24, 73–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/296044

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. BESSIRE, D, BAKER, C, R "The French Tableau de Bord and the American Balanced Scorecard:a critical analysis", Critical perspectiveson Accounting, 2004
  2. BOURGUIGNON, A, MALLERET, V, NORREKLIT,H "The American Balanced Scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: the ideological dimension" Management Accounting Research, Vol 15, Issue 2, June 2004
  3. ÇAKICI, C, "Muhasebe Yeni Bir Yaklaşım; Balanced Scorecard", Vergi Dünyası, Sayı 261,Mayıs 2003
  4. DEBUSK, G, BROWN, R, KİLLOUGH, L,"Components and Relative Weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the Balanced Scorecard" The British Accounting Review, Volume 35, Issue 3,September 2003
  5. ERDEN, S, A, "Yatırım Merkezi Başarı Değerlemesinde Kullanılan Ekonomik Katma Değer Ölçüsü ile Dengeli Değerleme Kartı (Balanced Scorecard) Uygulaması", Mufad, Sayı 20, Ekim 2003
  6. ERGUN, Ü, " Yönetsel Performansın Geliştirilmesinde Yeni Yaklaşımlar; Mükemmellik Modeli ve Balanced Scorecard" Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt;4, Sayı;l, Mart2002
  7. ERSOY, A, "Tekdüzen Maliyet Sisteminin Çağdaş Gelişmeler ve Amaçlar Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, Ankara, 1996
  8. GÖKÇEN, G "Faaliyet Tabanlı Maliyetlemenin İşletme Kararlarında Kullanılması" Mufad, Sayı 23, Temmuz, 2004
  9. KAPLAN, R, S, NORTON, D,P "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" Harvard Business Review, January- February 1996
  10. KAPLAN, R.S, NORTON, D, P "Balanced Scorecard" Sistem Yayıncılık, Ekim 2003
  11. KOÇEL, T, "İşletme Yöneticiliği" 9. Bası, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul 2003
  12. NORREKLIT, H, "The balanced on the balanced scorecard -a critical analysis of some of its assumptions" Management Accounting Research, Vol 11, Issue 1, March 2000
  13. RICKARDS, R,C "Setting benchmarks and evaluating balanced scorecards with data envelopment analysis ", An international journal, Volume 10, Number 3, 2003
  14. SAĞMANLI, M, ERSEN, Ç "Balanced Scorecard ve Stratejik Odaklı Kurum" Öneri, C 4, S 16, Haziran 2001
  15. TAYLES, B. ADSHEAD, F, "Dealing With TheManagement of Intellectual Capital" Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, Vol 15, Number 2, 2002
  16. ZIEGENFUSS, D, E "Developing an Internal Auditing Department Balanced Scorecard" Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol 15, 2000 "Balanced Scorecard üzerine bir çeviri" http://www. danismend. com "Guide to a Balanced Scorecard Performance Management Methodology " http://oamweb.osec.doc.gov/bsc/guide.htm "Microsoft Kurumsal Çözümler Sitesi" "http:://www.microsoft.com "Siemens Balanced Scorecard Uygulaması", http://www.insankaynaklari.com