Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2011 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Frontalis suspension surgery using autogenous material and silicone rod: comprasion of results

Frontal askılama cerrahisinde otojen materyaller ve silikon askının sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
192–199
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall mean value of preoperative margin reflex distance (preoperative MRDı) was -0.76±1.70 mm, mean value of postoperative margin reflex distance (postoperative MRDı) was +2.59±0.88 mm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the outcome of frontalis sling operation in patients with poor levator muscle function.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Thirty eight patients with ptosis and poor levator muscle function (<5 mm) who underwent frontalis sling operation performed by a single surgeon were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall mean value of preoperative margin reflex distance (preoperative MRDı) was -0.76±1.70 mm, mean value of postoperative margin reflex distance (postoperative MRDı) was +2.59±0.88 mm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the outcome of frontalis sling operation in patients with poor levator muscle function. Material and Method: Thirty eight patients with ptosis and poor levator muscle function (<5 mm) who underwent frontalis sling operation performed by a single surgeon were included in this study. Results: Sixty three affected eyes of 38 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 28.66±24.55 years (4 to 75). The overall mean value of preoperative margin reflex distance (preoperative MRDı) was -0.76±1.70 mm, mean value of postoperative margin reflex distance (postoperative MRDı) was +2.59±0.88 mm. Autogenous sling materials were used in 23 of cases (60%), whereas synthetic sling materials were used in 15 (40%) of cases. The avarage postoperative MRDı value of autogenous surgical material group was +2.71±0.78 mm and synthetic surgical material group was +2.18±1.06 mm. Postoperative change in MRDı values was significantly higher in autogenous surgical material group (p=0.049). The success rate of autogenous surgical material group was 91%, while the rate was 86% in synthetic surgical material group (p=0.501).Discussion: In the management of the patients with poor levator muscle function, frontalis sling with fascia lata operation is an effective surgical procedure due to its low complication rates and low reccurence rates. Frontalis sling operation with silicone provides good results in patients under three years of age in whom, autogenous fascia lata is diffucult to obtain and for the patients who are poor candidates for general anesthesia, those with no Bell phenomen and those who does not prefer fascia lata to be harvested

Özet

Amaç: Düşük levator fonksiyonu olan olgularda kullanılan sentetik (silikon askı), otojen (fasya lata ve palmaris longus tendonu) materyalleri ile uygulanan frontal kas askı cerrahisinin sonuçları ve komplikasyonlarını incelemek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza İzmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Has - ta lıkları Kliniği’nde; tek cerrah tarafından, düşük levator fonksiyonunun (<5mm) eşlik ettiği ve frontal askılama cerrahisi uygulanan 38 ptozis olgusu dahil edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamıza 38 olgunun 63 gözü dahil edildi. Olguların yaş ortalaması 28,66± 24,55 yıl idi (sınırları 4-75). Preoperatif marjin refle mesafesi (preoperatif MRMı) ölçüm ortalamaları -0,76±1,70 mm iken, postoperatif MRMı (postoperatif MRMı) ölçüm ortalamaları +2,59±0,88 mm idi. Otojen cerrahi materyal kullanılan olguların postoperatif dönemdeki MRMı (+2,71±0,78 mm) değerlerindeki artışın, sentetik cerrahi materyal kullanılan olguların (+2,18±1,06 mm) artışından fazla olması istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p=0,049). Olguların 23’ünde (%60) otojen (22 adet fasya lata, 1 adet palmaris longus), 15’inde (%40) sentetik bir askı materyali olan silikon askı kullanılmış idi. Otojen fasya lata ile başarılı kozmetik sonuçların oranı %91 iken, silikon askı grubunda ise bu oranın %85 idi (p=0,501). Sonuç: Levator fonksiyonu zayıf ptozis olgularının tedavisinde, fasya lata ile frontal askı, komplikasyon ve nüks ptozis oranlanın düşüklüğü nedeniyle etkin bir cerrahi yöntemdir. Üç yaş ve altında fasya latanın otojen olarak yeterli miktarda elde edilmesinde zorlanılması durumunda, genel anestezi riski olan yetişkinler, Bell fenomeninin zayıf olduğu olgularda ve fasya lata alınmasını istemeyen olgularda ise silikon askı materyali iyi sonuçlar veren bir yöntemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

MAT, E., KARADENİZ, Ş. U. (2011). Frontalis suspension surgery using autogenous material and silicone rod: comprasion of results. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 192–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/295780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Payr E. PlastikFaszientransplantationbei tozis. Dtsch Med. Wochenschr 1909;35:882 2. Tillett CW. Tillett GM. Slicone sling in the correction of ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1966;62:521-3 3. Karesh JW:Polytetraffluoroetilen as agraft material in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery:an experimental and clinical study. Ophthalmic Plast Recons Surg 1987;3: 179-85 4. Downes RN. Collin JRO. The mersilene mesh sling-a new concept in ptosis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1989:73;489-501 5. Wasserman B. Sprunger DT. Helveston EM. Comparison of materials used in frontalis suspension. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:687-91. 6. Uğurbaş SH. Zilelioğlu G. Frontal askı cerrahisinde yeni bir askı materyali: Palmaris longus tendonu. T Oftalmol Gaz 2000;30:26-30 7. Carter S. Meecham WJ. Seiff SR. Silicone frontalis slings for the correction of blepharoptosis: indications and efficacy. Ophthalmology 1996;103:623-30. 8. Yalaz M. Kaya A. Slem G. Othman İ. Mersilen mesh ilc frontal askılama prosedürü. TOD. XXVI. Ulusal Kongre Bült. Ön-Mat: Bursa 1992;1:41-4 9. Wright WW. The use of living sutures in the treatment of ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1922;51:99-102 10. Wagner RS. Mauriello JA. Treatment of congenital ptosis with frontalis suspension: A comparison of suspensory materials. Ophthalmol 1984;91:245-8 11. Ünal M. Öz Ö. Hasanreisoglu B. Ciddi blefaroptozisde fasia lata ile askılama. T Oftalmol Gaz 1996;26:299-303 12. Manners RM. Tyers AG. Morris RJ. The use of prolene as a temporary suspensory material for brow suspension in young children. Eye 1994;8:346-8 13. Söker Ç. Çaça İ. Ünlü K. Bilek B. Konjenital ptozisde otojen fasia lata ile frontal askılama cerrahisi. T Klin J Ophthalmol 2005;14:13-6 14. Ünal M. Bozan E. Konuk O. Hasanreisoglu B. Frontal Askılama Materyalinin Seçimi On Yıllık Deneyimle rimiz. T Oft Gaz 2005;35:271-9. 15. Crawford J. Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia lata: a 20-year review. Ophthalmic Surg 1977;8:31-40. 16. Jeong S. Ma JR. Park YG. Histopathological study of frontalis suspension materials. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000:44:171-4 17. Beyer CK. Albert DM. The use and the fate of fascia lata and sclera in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Ophthalmology 1981;88:869-86. 18. Cole MD. O'Connor GM. Raofal F. Willahow H. A new syntetic material for the brow suspension procedure. British J of Oph 1989;73:35-8. 19. Wheatcroft SM. Vandy SJ. Tyers G. Complication of facia lata harvesting for ptosis surgery. Br J Ophhalmol 1997;81:581-3 20. Wong CY.