Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2016 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Central Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity after Vitrectomy in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane

İdyopatik Epiretinal Membranda Vitrektomi Sonrası Santral Makula Kalınlığı ve Görme Keskinliği

Pages
95–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: PPV operation decreases CMT and increases CVA in idiopathic ERM patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate central macular thickness (CMT) and corrected visual acuity (CVA) following the pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In this study 14 eyes of 14 patients with idiopathic ERM were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: PPV operation decreases CMT and increases CVA in idiopathic ERM patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate central macular thickness (CMT) and corrected visual acuity (CVA) following the pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) patients. Material and Method: In this study 14 eyes of 14 patients with idiopathic ERM were included. CVA, CMT results before treatment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, last control after treatment were compared. Results: The follow up time following PPV was 15.28 ± 2.43 (mea ± standard deviation) months (12-19 months). CVA values were 0.62 ± 0.24 Log Mar, 0.69 ± 0.23 Log Mar, 0.57±0.22 Log Mar, 0.41 ± 0.25 Log Mar, 0.42 ± 0.30 Log Mar, 0.46 ± 0.32 Log Mar in turn (before treatment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, last control after treatment). CVA values at, 6 months (p=0.002), 12 months (p=0.008) and last control (p=0.017) after treatment, were significantly different from CVA before treatment. There was not any significant difference between 6 months and 12 months after treatment (p=0.838) also between 12 months and last control (p=0.088) for CVA. CMT values were 397.86 ± 74.61 µ, 371.14 ± 75.74 µ, 342.21 ± 69.94µ, 327.43 ± 64.94 µ, 311.79 ± 64.78 µ, 316.92 ± 66 µ in turn. CMT values at, 1 month (p=0.001), 3 months (p=0.001), 6 months (p=0.001), 12 months (p=0.001) and last control (p=0.001) after treatment, were lower than CMT before treatment. Conclusion: PPV operation decreases CMT and increases CVA in idiopathic ERM patients.

Özet

Amaç: İdyopatik epiretinal membranlı (ERM) hastalarda, pars plana vitrektomi (PPV) ameliyatı sonrası santral maküla kalınlığı (SMK)ve düzeltilmiş görme keskinliğini (DGK) değerlendirmek.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya idyopatik ERM tanısı ile PPV ameliyatı olan 14 hastanın 14 gözü dahil edildi. Hastaların tedavi öncesi iletedaviden 1 ay, 3 ay, 6 ay, 12 ay sonra ve son kontroldeki DGK, SMK değerleri karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Pars plana vitrektomi sonrası ortalama takip süresi 15,28±2,43 (ortalama ± standart sapma) ay (12-19 ay) olan hastaların ameliyat öncesi, ameliyattan 1 ay, 3 ay, 6 ay, 12 ay sonra ve son kontrolde saptanan ortalama DGK değerleri sırası ile 0,62±0,24 Log Mar, 0,69 ±0,23 Log Mar, 0,57 ± 0,22 Log Mar, 0,41 ± 0,25 Log Mar, 0,42 ± 0,30 Log Mar, 0,46 ± 0,32 Log Mar olarak saptandı. Ameliyat öncesi DGKdeğerlerine göre, ameliyattan 6 ay sonra (p=0,002), 12 ay sonra (p=0,008) ve son kontrolde (p=0,017) saptanan DGK'ları anlamlı olarakfarklıydı. Ameliyattan 6 ay sonra ile 12 ay sonra (p=0,838) ve 12 ay sonra ile son kontrolde (p=0,088) saptanan DGK' lar arasında anlamlıfark yoktu. Hastaların ameliyat öncesi, ameliyattan 1 ay, 3 ay, 6 ay, 12 ay sonra ve son kontrolde saptanan SMK değerleri sırası ile 397,86 ±74,61 µ, 371,14 ± 75,74 µ, 342,21 ± 69,94 µ, 327,43 ± 64,94 µ, 311,79 ± 64,78 µ, 316,92±66 µ olarak saptandı. Hastaların ameliyat öncesiSMK değerlerine göre, ameliyattan 1 ay sonra (p=0,001), 3 ay sonra (p=0.001), 6 ay sonra (p=0,001), 12 ay sonra (p=0,001) ve son kontrolde (p=0,001) saptanan SMK'ları anlamlı olarak azalmıştı.Sonuç: İdyopatik ERM'li hastalarda PPV ameliyatı SMK'yı azaltıp DGK' yı artırır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARDAK, Y., BARDAK, H. (2016). Central Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity after Vitrectomy in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 95–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/295514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Johnson TM, Johnson MW. Epiretinal membrane. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS (eds). Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. Elsevier Inc: China, 2004,pp 686-7
  2. Yang HK, Kim SJ, Jung YS, etal. Improvement of horizontal macular contraction after surgical removal of epiretinal membranes. Eye 2011, 25:754-61
  3. Kampik A, Kenyon KR, Michels RG, et al. Epiretinal and vitreus membranes. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:1445-54
  4. Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW, et al. Resolution of diabeticmacular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inerlimiting membrane. Retina 2000;20:126-33
  5. Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Gass CA, Kampik A. Indocyanine green stainingand removal of internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Am JOphthalmol 2002;133:587-8
  6. Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Williamson TH, et al. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' national ophthalmology database study of vitreoretinal surgery: Report 4, Epiretinal Membrane. Retina 2015;Mar 31. [Epub ahead of print] 7. Kwok AK, Timothy YY, Winnie WY, et al. Indocyanine greenasisted internal limiting membrane removal in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:194-9
  7. Kadosono K, Takeuchi S, Yabuki K, et al. Absorption of short wavelengths of endoillumination in indocyanine green solution: İmplications for internal limiting membrane removal. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241:284-6
  8. Tognetto D, Zenoni S, Sanguinetti G, et al. Staining of the internal limiting membrane with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Retina 2005;25:462-7
  9. Enaida H, Hisatomi T, Goto Y, et al. Preclinical investigation of internal limiting membrane staining and peeling using intravitreal brilliant blue G. Retina 2006;26:623-30
  10. Enaida H, Hisatomi T, Hata Y, et al. Brilliant Blue G selectively stains the internal limiting membrane /brilliant blue G-assisted membrane peeling. Retina 2006;26:631-6
  11. McDonald HR, Johnson RN, Ai E. Vitreoretinal surgery for idiopatic epiretinal membranes. In:Ryan SJ, ed. Retina, 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1999;1:327-37
  12. Thompson JT. Epiretinal membrane removal in eyes with good visualacuities. Retina 2005;25:875-82
  13. Song SJ, Kuriyan AE, Smiddy WE. Results and prognostic factors for visual improvement after pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina 2015;Jan 8. [Epub ahead of print] 15. Çekiç O, Çakır M, Alagöz N, et al. Retinal thickness change in relation to visual acuity improvement after 23-gauge vitrectomy for idiopathic epimacular membr