Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2017 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Correlation of Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye Tests in Cases with Acne Rosacea

Akne Rozasea Olgularında Oküler Yüzey Hastalık İndeksi ile Kuru Göz Testleri Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
133–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When cases with rosacea are seen in the dermatology department, it would be appropriate to suggest a further ophthalmological examination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the ocular surface disease index in cases with acne rosacea and to investigate the correlation between this index and dry eye tests.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Individuals over 18 years of age diagnosed with acne rosacea were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When cases with rosacea are seen in the dermatology department, it would be appropriate to suggest a further ophthalmological examination.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ocular surface disease index in cases with acne rosacea and to investigate the correlation between this index and dry eye tests. Material and Method: Individuals over 18 years of age diagnosed with acne rosacea were investigated. Age, gender, duration of disease, dry eye symptoms, ocular surface disease index scores, tear break-up time, Schirmer test and Meibomian gland dysfunction (presence of telangiectasia around the lid margin, lid margin findings and grade of meibum secretion) were evaluated. Dry eye symptoms were scored between 0 and 3. Results: Forty-five cases with a mean age of 40.31 ± 10.40 (22-64) years and dermatological problems persisting for a mean of 6.71 ± 5.14 (0.5-20) years were included. The mean scores for dry eye symptoms, ocular surface disease index, break-up time and Schimer test were 11.93 ± 3.58 (3-26), 56.57 ± 22.38 (6.8-100), 9.71 ± 2.18 (7-13) s and 8.80 ± 4.87 (2-21) mm, respectively. Moderate telangiectasia was observed in 20 cases (42%), and no telangiectasia around the lid margin was observed in 9 cases (20%). The lid margins were observed in 19 cases (44%) with severe signs and in 18 cases (40%) with mild signs. In the evaluation of meibum secretion, 21 cases (46%) were at stage 2 and 11 (24%) were at stage 1. Break-up time and Schimer test demonstrated a significant negative correlation with ocular surface disease index. Conclusion: Dry eye symptoms and Meibomian gland dysfunction in cases with acne rosacea are frequently observed. When cases with rosacea are seen in the dermatology department, it would be appropriate to suggest a further ophthalmological examination.

Özet

Amaç: Akne rozasea olgularında oküler yüzey hastalık indeksinin değerlendirilmesi ve bu indeks ile gözyaşı fonksiyon testleri arasındakiilişkinin incelenmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Akne rozasea tanısı alan 18 yaş üstü bireyler incelendi. Olguların yaş, cinsiyet, hastalık süresi, göz kuruluk semptomları, oküler yüzey hastalık indeksi skorları, gözyaşı kırılma zamanı, Schirmer testi ve Meibomian bez fonksiyon bozukluğu (kapak kenarında telenjiektazi varlığı, kapak kenar bulguları, Meibum sekresyonu) değerlendirildi. Göz kuruluk semptom değerlendirilmesi 0 ile 3 arasında skorlama ile yapıldı.Bulgular: Cilt problemi ortalama 6,71±5,14 yıl olan ortalama yaşı 40,31±10,40 yıl olan 45 olgu çalışmaya alındı.Olguların göz kuruluk semptomlarının ortalaması 11,93±3,58 , oküler yüzey hastalık indeksi ortalaması 56,57±22,38 , gözyaşıkırılma zamanı ortalaması 9,71±2,18 saniye ve Schirmer test ortalaması 8,80±4,87 milimetre idi. Yirmi olguda (%42) kapakta orta şiddette telenji ektazi izlendi. Kapak kenar bulguları açısından incelendiğinde 19 olguda (%44) şiddetli bulgular izlendi. Meibum sekresyonu derecelendirildiğinde 21 olguda (%46) evre 2, 11 olguda (%24) evre 1 olduğu görüldü. Olguların oküler yüzey hastalık indeksi ölçümleriile Schirmer test ve gözyaşı kırılma zamanı değerleri arasında negatif yönlü anlamlı ilişki saptandı. Oküler yüzey hastalık indeksi ölçümleri ilehastalık süresi arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanmadı. Sonuç: Akne rozasea olgularında göz kuruluk semptomlarının ve Meibomian bez fonksiyon bozukluğunun sık görüldüğü bilinmektedir. Buolgulara dermatoloji bölümünce tanı konmasıyla birlikte göz muayenelerine de yönlendirilmeleri uygun olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANTARCI, F. A. (2017). Correlation of Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye Tests in Cases with Acne Rosacea. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 133–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/295477

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Yildirim Y, Olcucu O, Agca A, et al. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of corneas in patients with ocular rosacea. Cornea 2015;34:313-7
  2. Erdem MT, Metin N. Rozasea. Dermatoz 2012;3:19-26
  3. Arman A, Demirseren DD, Takmaz T. Treatment of ocular rosacea: comparative study of topical cyclosporine and oral doxycycline. Int J Ophthalmol 2015;8:544-9
  4. Müftüoğlu İK, Akova Aydın Y. Clinical Findings, Follow-up and Treatment Results in Patients with Ocular Rosacea. Turk J Ophthalmol 2016;46:1-6
  5. Bhargava R, Chandra M, Bansal U, Singh D, Ranjan S, Sharma S. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Omega 3 Fatty Acids in Rosacea Patients with Dry Eye Symptoms. Curr Eye Res 2016;41:1274-80
  6. Vieira AC, Höfling-Lima AL, Mannis MJ. Ocular rosacea a review. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2012;75:363-9
  7. Jester JV, Parfitt GJ, Brown DJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: hyperkeratinization or atrophy? BMC Ophthalmol 2015;15:156
  8. Vieira AC, Mannis MJ. Ocular rosacea: common and commonly missed. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:36-41
  9. Arita R, Itoh K, Maeda S, Maeda K, Tomidokoro A, Amano S. Efficacy of diagnostic criteria for the differential diagnosis between obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction and aqueous deficiency dry eye. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010;54:387-91
  10. Arita R, Itoh K, Maeda S, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2058-63
  11. Li N, Deng XG, He MF. Comparison of the Schirmer I test with and without topical anesthesia for diagnosing dry eye. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5:478-81
  12. Bhargava R, Kumar P, Phogat H, Kaur A, Kumar M. Oral omega3 fatty acids treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38:206-10
  13. Kumar P, Bhargava R, Kumar M, Ranjan S, Kumar M, Verma P. The correlation of routine tear function tests and conjunctival impression cytology in dry eye syndrome. Korean J Ophthalmol 2014;28:122-9
  14. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/ Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J 1995;21:221-32
  15. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Patient history in screening for dry eye conditions. J Am Optom Assoc 1987;58:296-301
  16. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:615-21
  17. Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011