Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Short Term Comparison of 23-G and 25-G+ Transconjunctival Vitrectomy for Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy

Diyabetik Retinopati Komplikasyonlarında 23-G ve 25-G+ Transkonjonktival Vitrektominin Kısa Dönem Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Pages
202–206
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bimanuel surgery requirement is less with 25-G+ compared to 23-G surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare high speed 23-G and 25-G+ transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery for complicatons of diabetic retinopathy in short term.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: One hundred twenty five eyes of 120 patients who had primary pars plana vitrectomy for complications of diabetic retinopathy were retrospectively analyzed, and comparesion was made between 23-G and 25-G+ surgeries for intra-operative and early post-operative complications such as intraocular tamponade, sclerotomy suture requirement rates and bimanuel surgery rates seen during the post-operative 2 weeks retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bimanuel surgery requirement is less with 25-G+ compared to 23-G surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare high speed 23-G and 25-G+ transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery for complicatons of diabetic retinopathy in short term. Material and Method: One hundred twenty five eyes of 120 patients who had primary pars plana vitrectomy for complications of diabetic retinopathy were retrospectively analyzed, and comparesion was made between 23-G and 25-G+ surgeries for intra-operative and early post-operative complications such as intraocular tamponade, sclerotomy suture requirement rates and bimanuel surgery rates seen during the post-operative 2 weeks retrospectively. Bimanuel surgery rates were compared for the periods in which only 23-G or 25-G+ systems were used. Results: There were 43 eyes in the 23-G and 82 eyes in the 25-G+ group. There was no significant difference in rates of sclerotomy suture requirement, intra-operative and early post-operative complications between 23-G and 25-G+ groups. The distribution of types of tamponade was not different between 23 G and 25-G+ surgeries. Bimanuel surgery was required in 30% and 6.5% of 23-G and 25-G+ when compared for periods in which only 23-G or 25-G+ were used (p=0.012). Conclusion: Both 23-G and 25-G+ high speed vitrectomy are equally safe and effective in short term in the management of complications of diabetic retinopathy. Bimanuel surgery requirement is less with 25-G+ compared to 23-G surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Diyabetik retinopati komplikasyonlarının tedavisinde yüksek hızlı 23-G ve 25-G+ transkonjonktival vitrektominin kısa dönem sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Diyabetik retinopati komplikasyonları için primer pars plana vitrektomi uygulanan 120 hastanın 125 gözü geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Cerrahiler 23-G ve 25-G+ sistemi kullanılarak Alcon Constellation cihazı ile gerçekleştirildi. 23-G ve 25-G+ vitrektomi ameliyatları, intra-operatif ve ilk 2 hafta içinde görülen erken post-operatif komplikasyonlar, intraoküler tamponad gereksinimi, sklerotomi sütürü konması gereksinimi ve bimanuel cerrahi oranları açısından geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi ve karşılaştırıldı. Bimanuel cerrahi oranlarının karşılaştırılması yalnız 23-G veya 25-G+ sistemlerinin kullanıldığı dönemler için yapıldı. Bulgular: 23-G grubunda 43, 25-G+ grubunda ise 82 göz vardı. İki grup arasında sklerotomi sütür gereksinimi, intra-operatif ve erken post-operatif komplikasyonlar açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı. İki grup arasında intraoküler tamponad cinsinin dağılımı açısından fark yoktu. Bimanuel cerrahi yalnız 23-G ve yalnız 25-G+ kullanılan dönemlerde karşılaştırıldığında 23-G grubunda olguların %30’unda, 25-G+ grubunda ise %6,5’inde gerekli idi (p=0.012). Sonuç: Diyabetik retinopati komplikasyonlarının tedavisinde 23-G ve 25-G+ yüksek hızlı vitrektomi eşit etkili ve güvenlidir. Bimanuel cerrahi gereksinimi, 25-G+ vitrektomi ile 23-G ile vitrektomiye göre daha düşüktür

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCA, S., KALAYCI, D., GÜLTEKİN, B. P., KARABULUT, E. (2019). Short Term Comparison of 23-G and 25-G+ Transconjunctival Vitrectomy for Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 202–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/295377

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844-51
  2. The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group. Early vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy in eyes with useful vision. Results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Report 3. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103:1644-52
  3. Fang SY, DeBoer CM, Humayun MS. Performance analysis of new-generation vitreous cutters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:61-7
  4. Çakır M, Çekiç O, Yılmaz B, Yazgan S, Yılmaz ÖF. 23 Gauge Transkonjonktival Dikişsiz Vitrektomi Cerrahisi: İlk Sonuçla rı - mız. T Oft Gaz. 2008;38(5):400-5
  5. Hubschman JP. Comparison of different vitrectomy systems. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2005;28:606-9
  6. Inoue M, Noda K, Ishida S, Nagai N, Imamura Y, Oguchi Y. Intraoperative breakage of a 25-gauge vitreous cutter. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:867-9
  7. Chen JC. Sutureless pars plana vitrectomy through self-sealing sclerotomies. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1273-5
  8. Farouk MM, Naito T, Sayed KM, et al. Outcomes of 25-gauge vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:369-76
  9. Yang SJ, Yoon SY, Kim JG, Yoon YH. Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for the treatment of vitreoretinal complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40:461-6
  10. Kumar A, Duraipandi K, Gogia V, Sehra SV, Gupta S, Midha N. Comparative evaluation of 23- and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery in management of diabetic macular traction retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(1):107-13
  11. Dugel PU, Abulon DJ, Dimalanta R. Comparison of attraction capabilities associated with high-speed, dual-pneumatic vitrectomy probes. Retina. 2015;35(5):915-20
  12. Oellers P, Mahmoud TH. Surgery for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: New Tips and Tricks. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11 (1):93-9
  13. Mura M, Barca F. 25-Gauge vitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014; 54:45-53
  14. Sternfeld A, Axer-Siegel R, Stiebel-Kalish H, Weinberger D, Ehrlich R. Advantages of diabetic tractional retinal detachment repair. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;23;9:1989-94
  15. Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y. Surgical outcomes of 25-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for vitreoretinal diseases. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35:175-80
  16. Fang SY, DeBoer CM, Humayun MS. Performance a