SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Moment Dergi / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF EVERYDAY LIFE, POWER RELATIONS AND ETHICAL CODES

GÜNDELİK HAYAT, İKTİDAR İLİŞKİLERİ VE ETİK KODLARIN KESİŞİMİNDE ETNOGRAFİK ARAŞTIRMA

BAŞAK CAN BULUT
Pages
155–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The last part briefly discusses the fact that recently more ethnographic researches address questions about the ethical life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ethnographic research aims to understand people's relation to all aspects of life including nature, culture, things, imagination and practice on their own terms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research method is based on a long-term and intimate relationship between researcher and researched.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The last part briefly discusses the fact that recently more ethnographic researches address questions about the ethical life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ethnographic research aims to understand people's relation to all aspects of life including nature, culture, things, imagination and practice on their own terms. This research method is based on a long-term and intimate relationship between researcher and researched. This intimate relationship, which is based on trust brings about a number of ethical problems. This article first of all looks at the rise of ethical codes in human subject research and the influence of institutionalization of ethical rules on ethnographic research in the last three decades. These debates show the limits of ethical codes in ethnographic method and raise questions about how ethnographic research, which revolve around everyday life, engages with the questions of politics and ethics. The second part of the article deals with the ethical questions in ethnographic research in Turkey. The last part briefly discusses the fact that recently more ethnographic researches address questions about the ethical life.

Özet

Etnografik araştırma insanların doğayla, kültürle, nesnelerle, hayal gücüyle, pratikle yani yaşamın tüm alanlarıyla ilişkilerini onların kendi terimleriyle anlamaya çalışır. Bu araştırma yöntemi, araştırılan ve araştırmacı arasında uzun süreli ve yakın bir ilişkiye dayanmaktadır. Bu güvene dayalı yakın ilişki pek çok etik sorunu da beraberinde getirir. Bu yazıda insan araştırmalarında uyulması gereken etik kritelerin ortaya çıkışına ve özellikle son 30 yılda bu kuralların hızla kurumsallaşmasının etnografik araştırmalar üzerindeki etkisine bakılacaktır. Bu tartışmalar bir yandan etnografik yönteme ilişkin etik kodların sınırlarını gösterirken bir yandan da gündelik hayattaki ilişkileri merkezine alan etnografik araştırmaların daha genel politik ve etik meselelerle nasıl ilişkileneceğine dair soruları ortaya çıkarır. Yazının ikinci kısmı Türkiye'de etnografik araştırmalarda etik soruları nasıl düşünebileceğimizle ilgilidir. Sonuç bölümünde ise etnografik araştırmaların giderek etik yaşamla ilgili sorulara yöneliyor oluşuyla ilgili kısa bir tartışma yer almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, B. C. (2017). ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF EVERYDAY LIFE, POWER RELATIONS AND ETHICAL CODES. Moment Dergi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 155–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/294627

References (16)

  1. Alev, B. ve Genç, F. N. (2015). Türkiye'de üniversite etik kurulları üzerine bir inceleme. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 15(31), 135-182.
  2. Arda, B. (2000). Evaluation of research ethics committees in Turkey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(6), 459-461.
  3. Babbie, E. (2004). Laud Humphreys and research ethics. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(3/4/5). Başdemir, H. Y. (2007). Liberalizmin Ahlaki Temelleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  4. Beauchamp, T. L., ve Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th edition). New York, N.Y: OUP USA. Berreman, G. D. (2012). Ethics versus "Realism" in Anthropology. In A. C. G. M. Robben & J. A. Sluka (Eds.), Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader (pp. 331-352).
  5. Malden, Mass: John Wiley & Sons. Bourgois, P. (2011). Confronting the Ethics of Ethnography: Lessons from Fieldwork in Central America. In A. C. G. M. Robben & J. A. Sluka (Eds.), Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader (2nd ed., pp. 318-330).
  6. Malden, Mass: John Wiley & Sons. De Vos, J. (2009). Now that you know, how do you feel? The milgram experiment and psychologization. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 7, 223-246.
  7. Fairchild, A. L., ve Bayer, R. (1999). Uses and Abuses of Tuskegee. Science, 284(5416), 919-921.
  8. Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten Lies of Etnography: Moral Dilemmas of Field Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(3), 267-294.
  9. Horowitz, I. L. (Ed.). (1967). The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot: Studies in the Relationship between Social Science and Practical Politics (Revised edition). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
  10. Jaschik, S. (30 Kasım 2007).
  11. Questions, Anger and Dissent on Ethics Study. Erişim 12 Nisan 2017, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/11/30/anthro
  12. Jaschik, S. (11 Temmuz 2011). Anthropologists approve new code of ethics. Erişim 12 April 2017, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/11/07/anthropologistsapprove-new-code-ethics
  13. Keane, W. (2013). Ontologies, anthropologists, and ethical life. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 186-191.
  14. Lenza, M. (2004). Controversies surrounding Laud Humphreys' tearoom trade: an unsettling example of politics and power in methodological critiques. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(3/4/5), 20-31.
  15. Oguz, N. Y. (2003). Research ethics committees in developing countries and informed consent: with special reference to Turkey. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 141(5), 292-296.
  16. Ortner, S. B.