Journals / Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Uzmanlık Öğrencisi Hekimlerin Mentorluk Algılaması ve Öz Etkililikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi: İzmir İlinde Bir Çalışma

Analyzing The Relationship Between The Physician Assistants’ Perceptions of Mentorship and Their Self-Efficacy: A Sample From Izmir Province

Pages
93–105
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Benefiting from the positive role models in physician assistants’ social milieu may not initiate a behavior but it helps to maintain a behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Mentors are assigned to physician assistants by the heads of departments they work in after they start their duty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The population of this study covers physician assistants working in Ege University Hospital, Izmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, and Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. 436 of them were reached within the scope of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Benefiting from the positive role models in physician assistants’ social milieu may not initiate a behavior but it helps to maintain a behavior.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Mentors are assigned to physician assistants by the heads of departments they work in after they start their duty. This study seeks to reveal physician assistants’ perceptions towards their mentors and the relationship between their such perceptions and self-efficacy. Materials and Methods: The population of this study covers physician assistants working in Ege University Hospital, Izmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, and Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. 436 of them were reached within the scope of the study. The survey method was used for data collection to measure physician assistants’ perceptions of mentorship and selfefficacy. The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Results: The physicians working in the training and research hospitals have a significantly higher Mentoring Functions Scale total score, significantly higher score for acceptance and confirmation, significantly higher score for sponsorship, and significantly higher score for exposure and visibility compared to the physicians working in the university hospital (p<0.05). The correlation analysis conducted between the Mentoring Functions Scale and the Self -Efficacy Scale indicated that there is a relationship between all the sub-factors except for the role modeling subfactor of the Mentoring Functions Scale and the willingness to initiate a behavior sub-factor of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Conclusions: In this study, as relationships were detected between persistence in the face of adversity (self-efficacy) and coaching and acceptance and confirmation (mentoring). Benefiting from the positive role models in physician assistants’ social milieu may not initiate a behavior but it helps to maintain a behavior.

Özet

Objective: Mentors are assigned to physician assistants by the heads of departments they work in after they start their duty. This study seeks to reveal physician assistants’ per-ceptions towards their mentors and the relationship be-tween their such perceptions and self-efficacy. Materials and Methods: The population of this study covers physician assistants working in Ege University Hos-pital, Izmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, and Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. 436 of them were reached within the scope of the study. The sur-vey method was used for data collection to measure physi-cian assistants’ perceptions of mentorship and self-efficacy. The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Results: The physicians working in the training and re-search hospitals have a significantly higher Mentoring Functions Scale total score, significantly higher score for acceptance and confirmation, significantly higher score for sponsorship, and significantly higher score for exposure and visibility compared to the physicians working in the university hospital (p<0.05). The correlation analysis con-ducted between the Mentoring Functions Scale and the Self-Efficacy Scale indicated that there is a relationship be-tween all the sub-factors except for the role modeling sub-factor of the Mentoring Functions Scale and the willing-ness to initiate a behavior sub-factor of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Conclusions: In this study, as relationships were detected between persistence in the face of adversity (self-efficacy) and coaching and acceptance and confirmation (mentoring). Benefiting from the positive role models in physician assistants’ social milieu may not initiate a behav-ior but it helps to maintain a behavior.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYDAR, Y. T., GÜLHAN, Y. B., DANAYİYEN, A. (2020). Uzmanlık Öğrencisi Hekimlerin Mentorluk Algılaması ve Öz Etkililikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi: İzmir İlinde Bir Çalışma. Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 93–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/293883

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Frei E, Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Mentoring programs for medical students - A review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008. BMC Med Educ. 2010. doi:10.1186/1472-6920- 10-32 2. Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005. doi:10.1097/00001888-200501000-00017 3. Stueart RD, M. S. Developing Library Leaders: A How-To-Do-İt Man-ual For Coaching, Team Building, And Mentoring Li-brary Staff. In: New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers Inc.; 2010. 4. Hayes EF. Approaches to mentoring: how to mentor and be mentored. J Am Acad Nurse P r a c t. 2 0 0 5. d o i: 1 0. 1 1 1 1 / j. 1 7 4 5 - 7599.2005.00068.x 5. Kram KE, Isabella LA. Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships in Career Development. Acad Manag J. 1985. doi:10.5465/256064 6. Cantimer G. İlköğretim okul yöneticileri ve ilköğretim müfettişlerinin mentorluk rollerine ilişkin görüşleri (Sakarya İli Örneği). Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi,2008. 7. Noe RA. Women and Mentoring: A Review and Research Agenda. Acad Manag Rev. 1988. doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306784 8. Esas İ. Mentorluk ve bireysel kariyer arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı İşletme Yönetimi Tezli Yüksek Lisans Programı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye. 2013. 9. Ragins BR, Cotton JL. Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. J Appl Psychol. 1999. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.84.4.529 10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 11. Koçoğlu F. Sağlığı geliştirici yaşam tarzı ve öz etkili-lik-yeterlilik durumunun sosyo-ekonomik durum ile ilişkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya, Türkiye. 2009. 12. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory / Albert Bandura. New Jersey Prentice-Hall, 1986. 1986. 13. Senemoğlu N. Gelişim Öğrenme ve Öğretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya.; Yargı Yayınevi,
  2. Ankara, Ağustos 2013. 14. Ekici G. Akademik öz-yeterlik ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2012;(43):174-185 2007. 15. Esas İ. Mentorluk ve bireysel kariyer arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı İşletme Yönetimi Te