Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Taşeronluk ve firma özellikleri: Türkiye örneğinde iki yerel sanayi odağından bulgular

Subcontracting and firm characteristics: Evidence from two new local industrial districts in Turkey

Pages
635–669
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that while in Gaziantep subcontracting relations are primarily motivated by elements of the traditional, dualistic nature of the economy, in Denizli these relationships are more complex and evolved, and involve networking and collective efficiency gains across firms

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the nature of subcontracting relations across firms in textile industry in Denizli and Gaziantep provinces which were considered among the new local industrial districts that emerged following the adoption of export-led growth strategies in Turkey during the 1990s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The empirical analysis in the article is based on a unique data set that the authors have constructed using face-to-face survey methods with firm representatives in these two regions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that while in Gaziantep subcontracting relations are primarily motivated by elements of the traditional, dualistic nature of the economy, in Denizli these relationships are more complex and evolved, and involve networking and collective efficiency gains across firms
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article examines the nature of subcontracting relations across firms in textile industry in Denizli and Gaziantep provinces which were considered among the new local industrial districts that emerged following the adoption of export-led growth strategies in Turkey during the 1990s. The empirical analysis in the article is based on a unique data set that the authors have constructed using face-to-face survey methods with firm representatives in these two regions. Results show that while in Gaziantep subcontracting relations are primarily motivated by elements of the traditional, dualistic nature of the economy, in Denizli these relationships are more complex and evolved, and involve networking and collective efficiency gains across firms

Özet

Bu çalışmada Denizli ve Gaziantep illerinde tekstil sektöründe üretim yapan firmalar arasındaki alt sözleşme ya da taşeronluk ilişkileri ele alınmaktadır. Denizli ve Gaziantep illeri, Türkiye'de ihracata dayalı büyüme stratejilerinin benimsenmesi ile birlikte 1990'lı yıllarda ortaya çıkan yeni sanayi odakları arasındadır. Bu çalışmada uygulanan ampirik analiz, her iki ilde yer alan firmaların yöneticileriyle yüz yüze görüşmeler sonucu elde edilen özgün veri setine dayanmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre Gaziantep'te taşeronluk ilişkileri büyük ölçüde ekonominin ikili, geleneksel yapısına bağlı olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Denizli'de ise bu ilişkiler daha karmaşık ve gelişmiş olup firmalar arasındaki ağ iletişimini ve ortaklaşa verimlilik kazanımlarını kapsamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARACOĞLU, D. Ş., YAKIŞIR, A. B. K. (2016). Taşeronluk ve firma özellikleri: Türkiye örneğinde iki yerel sanayi odağından bulgular. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 635–669. https://ajindex.com/articles/292124

References (15)

  1. ABRAHAM, K.G., and TAYLOR, S.K. (1996), "Firms' Use of Outside Contractors: Theory and Evidence", Journal of Labor Economics 14 (3), 394-424.
  2. AJAYI, D.D. (2003), "The Nature and Scope of Production Sub-contracting in Nigeria", Africa Development 28 (3&4), 89-111. ANTRÀS, P. and HELPMAN, E. (2004), "Global Sourcing", Journal of Political Economy 112 (3), 552-580.
  3. ARIMAH, B.C. (2001), "Nature and Determinants of the Linkages between Informal and Formal Sector Enterprises in Nigeria", African Development Review 13 (1), 114-144.
  4. BENERIA, L. (1989), "Subcontracting and Employment Dynamics in Mexico City," in The Informal Economy- Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries, Eds. A. Portes, M. Castells, and L.A. Benton, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 173-189.
  5. BERGER, S. and PIORE, M.J. (1980), Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  6. BROMLEY, R. (1978), "Introduction--The Urban Informal Sector: Why is it Worth Discussing?", World Development 6 (9&10), 1033-1039.
  7. DIAZ-MORA, C. (2008), "What Factors Determine the Outsourcing Intensity? A Dynamic Panel Data Approach for Manufacturing Industries", Applied Economics 40 (19), 2509-2521.
  8. DIAZ-MORA, C. and TRIGUERO-CANO, A. (2012), "Why do Some Firms Contract out Production? Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data", Applied Economics 44 (13), 1631-1644.
  9. DOI, N. and COWLING, M. (1999), "Transaction Structure in Japanese Small Business Sector", Small Business Economics 12, 85-95.
  10. ERAYDIN, A. (2002),
  11. Yeni Sanayi Odakları, Yerel Kalkınmanın Yeniden Kavramsallaştırılması. Ankara, ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Basım İşliği. EVCIMEN, G., KAYTAZ, M., and ÇINAR, E. M. (1991), "Subcontracting, Growth and Capital Accumulation in Small-Scale Firms in the Textile Industry in Turkey", The Journal of Development Studies 28 (1), 130-149.
  12. GIRMA, S. and GÖRG, H. (2003),
  13. Outsourcing, Foreign Ownership and Productivity: Evidence from UK Establishment Level Data. DIW Berlin Discussion Papers No. 361. GIUNTA, A., NIFO, A., and SCALERA, D. (2012), "Subcontracting in Italian Industry: Labour Division, Firm Growth and the North-South Divide", Regional Studies 46 (8), 1067-1083.
  14. GONZALEZ-DIAZ, M., ARRUNADA, B. and FERNANDEZ, A. (2000), "Causes of Subcontracting: Evidence from Panel Data on Construction Firms", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 42, 167-187.
  15. GÖRG, H. and HANLEY, A. (2004), "Does Outsourcing Increase Profitability?", The Economic and Social Review 35 (3), 267-288. GRE