Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Türkiye'deki toplam girişimcilik aktivitelerini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi

Investigating the factors affecting total entrepreneurial activities in Turkey

Pages
275–292
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that being male, having higher income and education level, being self-confident, being alert to opportunities, and networking positively affect the likelihood of being an entrepreneur.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effects of demographic characteristics of individuals (age, gender, income level, education level, and work status) and their perceptions about themselves (networking, fear of failure, alertness to opportunities, self-confidence) on their involvement to the total entrepreneurial activities of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data are collected through using the standard questionnaire of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) project.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that being male, having higher income and education level, being self-confident, being alert to opportunities, and networking positively affect the likelihood of being an entrepreneur.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of demographic characteristics of individuals (age, gender, income level, education level, and work status) and their perceptions about themselves (networking, fear of failure, alertness to opportunities, self-confidence) on their involvement to the total entrepreneurial activities of Turkey. Data are collected through using the standard questionnaire of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) project. The results show that being male, having higher income and education level, being self-confident, being alert to opportunities, and networking positively affect the likelihood of being an entrepreneur. However, contradictory to the literature and our expectations , fear of failure is not found to be a significant factor that influences the likelihood of being involved in the total entrepreneurial activities of Turkey

Özet

Bu çalışma kişilerin demografik özelliklerinin (yaş, gelir seviyesi, eğitim seviyesi ve çalışma statüsü) ve kendilerine karşı algılarının (ağ oluşturma, başarısızlık korkusu, fırsatlara karşı uyanıklık, kendine güven) Türkiye'deki girişimcilik aktivitelerine ilgilerine/katılımlarına olan etkisini incelemektedir. Veriler Küresel Girişimcilik İzleme (KGİ) projesinin standart anketini kullanarak toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar erkek olmanın, daha yüksek gelir ve eğitim düzeyinde olmanın, kendine güvenli olmanın, fırsatlara karşı uyanık olmanın ve sosyal ağ oluşturabilmenin girişimci olma olasılığını pozitif etkilediğini göstermektedir. Fakat literatüre ve beklentilerimize aykırı olarak, başarısızlığa karşı korkunun Türkiye'deki girişimcilik aktivitelerine ilgi/katılımı etkileyen önemli bir faktör olmadığı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, Ö., KARADENİZ, E. (2011). Türkiye'deki toplam girişimcilik aktivitelerini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 275–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/292117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acs, Z. and audretsch, D.B. (1993), Small firms and entrepreneurship: an East-West perspective, Cambiridge University Press.
  2. Akçomak, S. and Taymaz, E. (2004), Assessing the Effectiveness of Incubators: The Case of Turkey, ERC Working Papers in 04/12. Aldrich, H. E. and Martinez, M. A. (2001), "Many are Called, but Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25: 41-56.
  3. Allen, I.E., langowitz, N. and Minniti, M. (2007), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2006
  4. Report on Women and Entrepreneurship, The Center for Women's Leadership, Babson College and London Business School, Babson Park, MA., and London, U.K. Alpkan, L., Yilmaz, C., Kaya, N. (2007), 'Market Orientation and Planning Flexibility in SMEs: Performance Implications and an Empirical Investigation', International Small Business Journal, 25 (2): 152-172,
  5. Arenius, P. and De Clercq, D. (2005), "A network-based approach on opportunity recognition", Small. Business Economics, 24: 249-265.
  6. Arenius, P., and Minniti, M. (2005), 'Perceptual Variables and Nascent Entrepreneurship', Small Business Economics, 24:233-247.
  7. Bayhan, D. and Özdemir, A. H. (2009), Technology Based Entrepreneurship and Incubation in Turkey in Models for National Technology and Innovation Capacity Development in Turkey, in cooperation with State Planning Organization (SPO), and Technology Development Foundation of Turkey (TTGV). Blanchflower, D.G. (2004), Self-employment: More may not be better. Working Paper 10286. Cambridge, MA:. National Bureau of Economic Research. Bosma, N. and harding, R. (2007), Global Entrepreneurship: GEM 2006
  8. Summary Results, Babson College and London Business School, London, U.K., and Babson Park, MA. Boyd, N.G. and Vozncis, G.S. (1994), "The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18 (4), 63-77.
  9. Chow, I.H. (2006), "The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in The People's Republic of China", Advanced Management Journal, 71(3), 11-20.
  10. Davidsson, P. and Hong, B. (2003), "The Role of Social and Human Capital among Nascent Entrepreneurs", Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 301-331.
  11. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P. (2000), "Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs ", Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1): 1-23.
  12. Drnovsek, M. (2004), "Job Creation Process in a Transition Economy", Sm