SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Denetleme ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Kamusal Alanın Dönüşümü

Surveillance and the Transformation of Public Sphere in the Ottoman Empire

FERDAN ERGUT
Pages
173–193
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The story of this transformation in the Ottoman Empire is the story of the dissolution of the traditional social control systems, such as guilds, neighborhood and family.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to historicize the transformation of the public sphere in the late Ottoman Empire as an unintended consequence of the surveillance practices of the state.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By analyzing those practices especially in relation to two different social groups - vagrants and workers- the article aims to show how the penetration of the state into the daily lives of the people and the intrusion of capitalism into the relations in the work place effect the transformation of what is “private” and what is “public”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The story of this transformation in the Ottoman Empire is the story of the dissolution of the traditional social control systems, such as guilds, neighborhood and family.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to historicize the transformation of the public sphere in the late Ottoman Empire as an unintended consequence of the surveillance practices of the state. This transformation is explained with reference to two crucial large scale processes: state-making and capitalism. It takes the police and policing practices of the state as an arena within which the struggle over the control of the public sphere was waged. By analyzing those practices especially in relation to two different social groups - vagrants and workers- the article aims to show how the penetration of the state into the daily lives of the people and the intrusion of capitalism into the relations in the work place effect the transformation of what is “private” and what is “public”. The story of this transformation in the Ottoman Empire is the story of the dissolution of the traditional social control systems, such as guilds, neighborhood and family.

Özet

Bu makale geç Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda kamusal alanın dönüşümünü, devletin gözetleme pratiklerinin niyet edilmemiş sonuçları olarak tarihselleştirmeye çalışmaktadır. Bu dönüşüm, esas olarak iki büyük süreçle ilintilendirilerek açıklanmıştır: Devlet inşası ve kapitalizm. Makale, polis ve polislik pratiklerini kamusal alanın denetlenmesi mücadelesinin yapıldığı temel alanlar olarak almaktadır. Bu pratikleri özellikle iki toplumsal grup –“serseriler” ve işçiler – üzerindeki uygulamalarına referansla inceleyen makale, bir yandan devletin gündelik hayata nüfuzunun, bir yandan da kapitalizmin çalışma alanlarına müdahalesinin “özel” ve “kamusal” alanların dönüşümüne olan etkisini göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu dönüşümün Osmanlı İmparatorluğundaki hikayesi, loncalar, mahalle ve aile gibi geleneksel toplumsal denetim sistemlerinin çözülüşünün hikayesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGUT, F. (2007). Denetleme ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Kamusal Alanın Dönüşümü. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 173–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/292087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. AHMAD, F. (1980), “Vanguard of a Nascent Bourgeoisie: The Social and Economic Policy,” in Halil İnalcık ve Osman Okyar, der., Social And Economic History of Turkey (1071-1920). Ankara:
  2. Meteksan. AYDIN, S., EMİROĞLU, K., TÜRKOĞLU, Ö., ÖZSOY, E. D. (2005), Küçük Asya’nın Bin Yüzü: Ankara. Ankara:
  3. Dost Yayınevi.
  4. BAYLEY, D. (1985), Patterns of Policing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  5. BENDIX, R. (1960/1977), Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cevdet Tasnifi –Zaptiye. 1750-1850,
  6. Başbakanlık Arşivi, İstanbul.
  7. CLARK, J. P. and SYKES, R. E. (1974), “Some Determinants of Police Organization and Practice in A Modern Industrial Democracy”, in Daniel Glaser, ed., Handbook Of Criminology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company. COLLINS, H. (1987), “The Decline of Privacy in Private Law,” in P. Fitzpatrick and A. Hunt, ed., Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. CRITCHLEY, T. A. (1967), A History of Police in England and Wales 900-1966, London: Constable. ÇADIRCI, M. (1991), Tanzimat Döneminde Anadolu Kentlerinin Sosyal ve Ekonomik Yapıları. Ankara:
  8. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. ÇADIRCI, M. (2007), Tanzimat Sürecinde Ülke Yönetimi. İstanbul:
  9. İmge Kitabevi.
  10. DAVIS, J. A. (1988), Conflict and Control: Law and Order in Nineteenth Century Italy. Basingstoke: Humanities Press International, Inc. DUBEN, A. and BEHAR, C. (1996), İstanbul Haneleri. İstanbul:
  11. İletişim Yayınları.
  12. ERGENÇ, Ö. (1984), “Osmanlı Şehrindeki ‘Mahalle’nin İşlev ve Nitelikleri Üzerine”, The Journal of Ottoman Studies IV: 69-78.
  13. ERGENÇ, Ö. (1999), “Osmanlı Klasik Düzeni ve Özellikleri Üzerine Bazı Açıklamalar”, Osmanlı Ansiklopedisi. Vol. 4. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları: 32-39.
  14. ERGUT, F. (2002), “Policing the Poor in the Late Ottoman Empire.” Middle Eastern Studies. 38 (2), 149-165.
  15. ERGUT, F. (2004), “Polisin Gözüyle Sosyalistler, Anarşistler ve Grev”, Toplumsal Tarih, no. 130, 82-86.
  16. ERGUT, F. (2007), “Osmanlı’da Devlet-Toplum İlişkisini Polis ve Polislik Pratikleri Üzerinden Düşünmek” in F. Ergut and A. Uysal (eds.) Tarihsel Sosyoloji: Stratejiler, Sorunsallar ve Paradigmalar, Ankara: Tarih Vakfı ve Dipnot Yayınları.
  17. GERBER, H. (1994),
  18. State, Society, and Law in Islam, New York: SUNY Press.
  19. GIDDENS, A. (19811995), A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Second Edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  20. GIDDENS, A. (1987), The Nation State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  21. GINIO, E. (1998), “The