SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Çoklu Performans Kıstası Kullanımının Tam Zamanında Üretim ve Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Uygulama Düzeyine Etkisi: Türkiye'den Bulgular

The Effect of Multiple Performance Criteria Usage on the Just in Time Production and total Quality Management Implementation Levels: Findings from Turkey

ZEHRA BERNA AYDIN
SELİM TÜZÜNTÜRK
Mehmet Eymen ERYILMAZ
Pages
225–247
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first empirical study that investigates the relationships between JIT, TQM and multiple performance measurement concepts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the effect of the multiple performance criteria usage on Just in Time Production (JIT) and Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Earlier studies have highlighted that JIT and TQM implementation levels play a major role in the success of organizational performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first empirical study that investigates the relationships between JIT, TQM and multiple performance measurement concepts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article examines the effect of the multiple performance criteria usage on Just in Time Production (JIT) and Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation levels. Earlier studies have highlighted that JIT and TQM implementation levels play a major role in the success of organizational performance. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the significant Balanced Scorecard (BSC) perspectives that may affect JIT and TQM using Logit regression analysis. The analysis process was executed on a sample of 117 industrial organizations from the top 500 large-scale industrial organizations of Turkey for 2004. Binary logistic regression models were estimated for the stated sample. Regression estimates showed that the two perspectives of “internal business” and “customer” enhanced the JIT implementation level in organizations. In addition, four perspectives, “innovation and learning”, “customer”, “sales” and “financial”, were found to be significant in influencing the TQM implementation level in organizations. Finally, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first empirical study that investigates the relationships between JIT, TQM and multiple performance measurement concepts.

Özet

Bu makale çoklu performans kıstası kullanımının Tam Zamanında Üretim (TZÜ) ve Toplam Kalite Yönetimi (TKY) üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Daha önceki çalışmalar TZÜ ve TKY uygulama düzeylerinin örgüt performansının başarısı üzerinde büyük bir rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı Logit regresyon analizini kullanarak TZÜ ve TKY’yi etkileyebilecek anlamlı Dengeli Ölçüm Kartı (DÖK) perspektiflerinin belirlenmesidir. Analiz süreci Türkiye’nin 2004’de en üstteki 500 büyük ölçekli endüstri örgütünden 117 endüsti örgütü örneklemi üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Belirtilen örneklem için ikili lojistik regresyon modelleri tahmin edilmiştir. Regresyon tahminleri örgütlerde iki perspektifin, firma içi ve müsteri perspektiflerinin TZÜ kullanım düzeyini arttırdığını göstermiştir. İlave olarak, dört perspektifin, yenilik ve öğrenme, müsteri, satış ve finansal perspektiflerinin örgütlerdeki TKY uygulama düzeyini etkilemede önemli olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, bildiğimiz kadarıyla bu çalışma TZÜ, TKY ve çoklu performans ölçüm kavramları arasındaki ilişkileri araştıran ilk deneysel çalışmadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, Z. B., TÜZÜNTÜRK, S., ERYILMAZ, M. E. (2008). Çoklu Performans Kıstası Kullanımının Tam Zamanında Üretim ve Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Uygulama Düzeyine Etkisi: Türkiye'den Bulgular. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 225–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/292047

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adam, E.E.Jr., Corbett, L.M., Flores, B.E., Harrison, H.J., Lee, T.S., Rho, B., Ribera, J., Samson, D. and Westbrook, R. (1997), "An International Study of Quality Improvement Approach and Firm Performance", International Journal of Production & Operation Management, 17(9), 842-873.
  2. Ahire, S.L., Golhar, D.Y. and Waller, M.A. (1996), "Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs", Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23r56. Ahmad, S. and Schroeder, R. (2002), "The Importance of Recruitment and Selection Process for Sustainability of Total Quality Management", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 19(5), 540-550.
  3. Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2001), "Process Improvement through Performance Measurement: The Balanced Scorecard Methodology", Work Study, 50(5), 179-188.
  4. Bartezzaghi, E. and Turco, F. (1989), "The Impact of Just in Time on Product, on System Performance: An Analytic Framework", International Journal of Operational and Production Management, 9(9), 40-61.
  5. Bayazit, O. (2003), "Total Quality Management (TQM) Practices in Turkish Manufacturing Organizations", The TQM Magazine, 15(5), 345-350.
  6. Bemowski, K. (1992), "The Quality Glossary", Quality Progress, 25 (2), 18-29.
  7. Bhagwat, R. and Sharma, M.K. (2007), "Performance Measurement of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Scorecard Approach", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53, 43-62.
  8. Biggart, T.B. and Gargeya, V. (2002), "Impact of JIT on Inventory to Sales Ratios", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(4), 197-202.
  9. Black, S.A. and Porter, L.J. (1996), "Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM", Decision Sciences, 27(1), 1-21.
  10. Bourguignon, A., Malleret, V. and Norreklit, H. (2004), "The American Balanced Scorecard versus the French Tableu de Bord: The Ideologic Dimension", Management Accounting Research, 15, 107-134.
  11. Bulbul, H. and Gules, H.K. (2004), "Türk Sınai İşletmelerinde İleri İmalat Teknolojileri Kullanımı ve Performansa Etkisi", ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 31,1-42.
  12. Chapman, R. and Al-Khawaleh, K. (2002), "TQM and Labor Productivity in Jordanian -Industrial Companies", The TQM Magazine, 14(4), 248-262.
  13. Chong, H., White, R.E. and Prybutok, V. (2001), "Relationship among Organizational Support, JIT Implementation, and Performance", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101, 273.-280. Cronbach, L.J. (1951), "Coefficient Alpha and Internal Structure of Test", Psychometrica, September, 297-334.
  14. Dabhilkar, M. and Bengtsson, L. (2004), "Balanced Scorecards