SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Institutionalization of institutional theory: A general analysis of Turkey- based institutional theory studies

Kurumsal kuramın kurumsallaşması: Türkiye kaynaklı kurumsal kuram çalışmalarına ilişkin genel bir değerlendirme

EYÜP AYGÜN TAYŞİR
Pages
53–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, this study explains the signs of the institutional entrepreneurs in the diffusion of institutional theory studies in Turkey; compares the Turkey-based institutional theory studies with the studies from USA; analyzes the methodological features of Turkey-based institutional theory studies; and finally, reveals the relationship between presenting an institutional theory related paper at the National Management and Organization Conference and its transformation to become a journal article.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the evolution of institutional theory in Turkey through the papers that appeared at the National Management and Organization Conferences between 2000-2010, besides other works of those papers' authors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, this study reveals how institutional theory studies became an important subfield among management and organization researchers in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, this study explains the signs of the institutional entrepreneurs in the diffusion of institutional theory studies in Turkey; compares the Turkey-based institutional theory studies with the studies from USA; analyzes the methodological features of Turkey-based institutional theory studies; and finally, reveals the relationship between presenting an institutional theory related paper at the National Management and Organization Conference and its transformation to become a journal article.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the evolution of institutional theory in Turkey through the papers that appeared at the National Management and Organization Conferences between 2000-2010, besides other works of those papers' authors. In this context, this study reveals how institutional theory studies became an important subfield among management and organization researchers in Turkey. Additionally, this study explains the signs of the institutional entrepreneurs in the diffusion of institutional theory studies in Turkey; compares the Turkey-based institutional theory studies with the studies from USA; analyzes the methodological features of Turkey-based institutional theory studies; and finally, reveals the relationship between presenting an institutional theory related paper at the National Management and Organization Conference and its transformation to become a journal article.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Kurumsal Kuram’ın Türkiye’deki evrimini, 2000 – 2010 yılları arasında Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi’nde (UYOK) sunulan bildiriler ve bu bildirilerde adı geçen araştırmacıların kongre harici yayınları üzerinden incelemektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışma, bahsi geçen yıllar arasında, Türkiye'de kurumsal kuramın yönetim ve örgüt bilimciler arasında bir çalışma alanı olarak nasıl yayıldığına, bu yayılımda kurumsal girişimcilerin izlerine, Türkiye’de kurumsal kuramın araştırmaya konu edilen alt çalışma alanlarının merkez ülke olan ABD’deki çalışma alanlarıyla ne derece paralel olduğuna, Türkiye’de kurumsal kuram çalışmalarının metodolojik özelliklerine ve UYOK’da sunulan kurumsal kuram konulu bildirilerin yayına dönüşme süreçlerine ilişkin bulgular sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAYŞİR, E. A. (2014). Institutionalization of institutional theory: A general analysis of Turkey- based institutional theory studies. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 53–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/291981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ALVESSON, M. ve SANDBERG, J. "Generating Research Questions through Problematization", Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271.
  2. BOWRING, M.A. (2000), “De/ Constructing theory: A Look at the Institutional Theory that Positivism Built”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(3), 258-270.
  3. DACIN, M.T., MUNIR, K. VE TRACEY, P. (2010) “Formal Dining at Cambridge Colleges: Linking Ritual Performance and Institutional Maintenance”, Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1393-1418.
  4. DIMAGGIO, P. J. ve POWELL, W. W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  5. DIMAGGIO, P. J. (1988), “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory”, in Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Ed. Lynne G. Zucker, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company, pp. 3-21.
  6. DONALDSON, L. (1995), American Anti-management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres ERÇEK, M. ve ÜSDİKEN, B. (2002), “Türkiye’de İşletme İktisadı 1930-1950”, 10. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 23-25
  7. Mayıs, Antalya, Türkiye. GÖKŞEN, N. S. "Makrokurumsal Bakış Açısı: Bir Değerlendirme", Eds. Sargut S. A. ve Özen, Ş. Örgüt Kuramları, Ankara: İmge, 331-378.
  8. GREENWOOD, R., SUDDABY, R. ve HININGS, C.R. (2002), “Theorizing Change: the Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields”, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1, 58-80.
  9. GÜROL, Y., DOĞRUSOY, G. ve ÖZEN, A. (2004), “Yönetim Alanında Çalışan Türk Akademisyenlerin Çalışmalarında Kullandıkları Modern Sonrası Teoriler Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, 12. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 27-29 Mayıs 2004,
  10. Bursa, Türkiye. HOFFMAN, A.J. (1999), “Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and The U.S. Chemical Industry”, Academy of Management Journal. 42, 4, 351-371.
  11. KRAATZ, M.S ve MOORE, J.H. (2002), “Executive Migration and Institutional Change”, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1, 120-143.
  12. LAWRENCE, T. B., ve SUDDABY, R. (2006), “Institutions and Institutional Work”, in The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Eds. Clegg S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. ve Nord W. Second Edition, London: Sage, 215-254.
  13. LEBLEBİCİ, H. "American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation" Administrative Science Quarterly. Sep97, Vol. 42 Issue 3, 602-604.
  14. ÖNDER, Ç. ve ÜSDİKEN, B. (2010), “Siyasi itaat, teknik beceri