SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Social exchange with the organization and turnover intention: The roles of self efficacy and work engagement

Çalışanın örgütle sosyal mübadele algısı ve işten ayrılma niyeti: İşe cezbolmanın ve öz yeterliliğin rolü

GÖKHAN KARAGONLAR
ENGİN BAĞIŞ ÖZTÜRK
Ömür N. T. ÖZMEN
Pages
411–433
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that self efficacy weakened the positive association between social exchange with the organization and work engagement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study examined the moderating role of self efficacy in the relationship between employees' social exchange perceptions with the organization and their turnover intention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The hypothesized moderated mediation model was tested on a sample of 153 white collar employees of a textile manufacturing company located in Marmara region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that self efficacy weakened the positive association between social exchange with the organization and work engagement.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study examined the moderating role of self efficacy in the relationship between employees' social exchange perceptions with the organization and their turnover intention. Further, we expected that this moderating influence of self efficacy would be mediated by work engagement. The hypothesized moderated mediation model was tested on a sample of 153 white collar employees of a textile manufacturing company located in Marmara region. The findings revealed that self efficacy weakened the positive association between social exchange with the organization and work engagement. Further, this weakening effect of self efficacy on the social exchange - work engagemet relationship was carried over to turnover intention.

Özet

Bu çalışma, davranışın esnekliği kuramından yola çıkarak çalışanın örgütle olan sosyal mübadele algısı ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide öz yeterliliğin biçimlendirici rolünü incelemektedir. Dahası, öz yeterliliğin sosyal mübadele ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki bu biçimlendiricilik etkisinin dolaylı olacağı öne sürülmekte ve bu doğrultuda işe cezbolmanın aracı rolü incelenmektedir. Önerilen bu biçimlendirilen aracılık modeli Marmara Bölgesi'nde faaliyet gösteren bir tekstil firmasının 153 beyaz yaka çalışanı üzerinde bir soru formu aracılığıyla test edilmiştir. Bulgular öz yeterliliğin sosyal mübadele ve işe cezbolma arasındaki olumlu ilişkiyi zayıflattığını ve bu nedenle öz yeterlilik arttıkça sosyal mübadele ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki dolaylı ilişkinin azaldığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGONLAR, G., ÖZTÜRK, E. B., ÖZMEN, Ö. N. T. (2015). Social exchange with the organization and turnover intention: The roles of self efficacy and work engagement. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 411–433. https://ajindex.com/articles/291943

References (13)

  1. BAGOZZİ, R. P. ve EDWARDS, J. R. (1998), "A general approach to construct validation in organizational research: Application to the measurement of work values", Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45-87.
  2. BAKKER, A. B. (2011), "An Evidence-Based Model of Work Engagement", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 265-269.
  3. BAKKER, A. B., ALBRECHT, S. L. ve M. P. LEITER (2011), "Key Questions Regarding Work Engagement", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4-28.
  4. BAKKER, A. B.ve DEMEROUTI E. (2008), "Towards a Model of Work Engagement", The Career Development International, 13, 209-223.
  5. BAKKER, A. B., SCHAUFELI, W. B., LEITER, M. P. ve TARIS, T. W. (2008), "Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology", Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200.
  6. BAL, M. P., CHIABURU, D. S.ve JANSEN, P. G. (2010), "Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier?", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 252-273.
  7. BANDURA, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co. BANDURA, A.ve LOCKE E. A. (2003), "Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.
  8. BECKER, T. E. (2005). "Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis with Recommendations", Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274-289.
  9. BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C. P. (1987), "Practical issues in structural are modeling", Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117.
  10. BLAU, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley: New York. BRISLIN, R. (1980), "Translation and content analysis of oral and written material." H.C. Triandis ve J. W. Berry (Der.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. BROCKNER, J. (1988). Self-esteem at Work: Research, Theory, and Practice, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA. BUCH, R., KUVAAS, B., SHORE, L. ve DYSVIK, A. (2014), "Once bitten, twice shy? Past breach and present exchange relationships", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(8), 938-952.
  11. BYRNE, Z., V. PITTS, D. CHIABURU, ve Z. STEINER (2011), "Managerial Trustworthiness and Social Exchange with the Organization", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 108-122.
  12. COHEN, A. (1999), "The Relation between Commitment Forms and Work Outcomes in Jewish and Arab Culture", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 371-391.
  13. COHEN, J., COHEN, P., WEST S. G. ve AIKEN L. S. (2003). Appl