Journals / Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Experiences of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ten years: retrospective study

On yıllık perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimlerimiz: retrospektif çalışma

Pages
147–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As we see in our study with large series, per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy is a highly effective and safe method in stone diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The evaluation of the commonly used procedure Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL) on 976 patients with stone disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: 976 patients (568 men/408 women) underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation betwe- en July 2003 and May 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As we see in our study with large series, per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy is a highly effective and safe method in stone diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The evaluation of the commonly used procedure Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL) on 976 patients with stone disease. Material and Methods: 976 patients (568 men/408 women) underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation betwe- en July 2003 and May 2013. Giving the patient prone posi- tion percutaneous intervention was performed under C-arm fluoroscopy. 30 F Amplatz sheath was placed after enlar- gement of the entrance way with Amplatz dilatation. 26 F rigid nephroscope and pneumatic lithotriptor were used to disintegrate and cleane the stones. 18 F nephrostomy tube was placed at the end of the operation. The results of 976 cases were compared. Results: The mean age of 47,6±10 (17-76) of 568 men and 408 women totally 976 patients were performed PNL. PNL was applied to 536 right, 440 left unit. The stone burden was found to be 8,1±4,21 cm2 (2-30 cm2). The average operation duration was 72,1±29,7 minutes (30-80 minu- tes). The stone free rate was calculated as 849/976 (87 %). 46 patients (4,8 %) were applied blood transfusion during postoperative period. Complicated urinary tract infection developed in 16 patients. The average duration of stay for nephrostomy was 2,6 days and the average lenght of hospi- tal stay was 3,4 days. Conclusion: As we see in our study with large series, per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy is a highly effective and safe method in stone diseases.

Özet

Amaç: Kliniğimizde taş cerrahisinde oldukça sık olarak kullanılan bir yöntem olan perkütan nefrolitotominin (PNL) 976 hasta üzerinden değerlendirilmesi Gereç ve Yöntem: Temmuz 2003 ile Mart 2013 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde 976 hastaya (568 erkek/408 kadın) perkütan nefrolitotomi operasyonu uygulandı. Perkütan gi- rişim C kollu floroskopi altında hastaya yüzüstü (prone) po- zisyonu verilerek yapıldı. Amplatz dilatatörlerle giriş yolu genişletildi ve 30 F Amplatz sheat yerleştirildi. Perkütan taş kırma ve taşların temizlenmesi 26 F rigid nefroskop ve pnömatik litotriptörle yapıldı. Operasyonun bitiminde 18 F nefrostomi tüpü takıldı. Dokuz yüz yetmiş altı olgunun so- nuçları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 47,6±10 (17-76) olan 568 erkek, 408 kadın toplam 976 olguya PNL uygulandı. Beş yüz otuz altı sağ, 440 sol üniteye PNL operasyonu yapıldı. Hasta- ların taş yükü 8,1±4,21 cm2 (2-30 cm2) bulundu. Ortalama operasyon süresi 72,1±29,7 dk.’ydı (30-80 dk.). Taşsızlık oranı 849/976 (% 87) olarak hesaplandı. Postoperatif dö- nemde 46 (% 4,8) hastaya kan transfüzyonu yapıldı. On altı hastada komplike İYE gelişti. Nefrostomi kalış süresi orta- lama 2,6 gün, hastanede kalış süresi ortalama 3.4 gündü. Sonuç: Perkütan nefrolitotomi geniş serili çalışmamızda görüldüğü üzere etkinliği yüksek güvenle uygulanabilecek bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖTÜNÇTEMUR, A., BEŞİROĞLU, H., DURSUN, M., ŞAHİN, S., KÖKLÜ, İ., ERKOÇ, M., DANIŞ, E., BOZKURT, M., ÖZBEK, E. (2013). Experiences of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ten years: retrospective study. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 147–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/291915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Choong S, Whitfield H, Duffy P, et al. The management of pediatric urolithiasis. BJU Int 2000; 86: 857-860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00909.x PMid:11069414 2. Şahin A, Tekgül S, Erdem E, Ekici S, Hasçiçek M, Ken- di S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older children. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 1336-1338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.9327 PMid:10999692 3. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolitho- tomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Neph- rol 1976; 10: 257-259. PMid:1006190 4. Segura JW, Patterson DE, Le Roy AJ, et al. Percutane- ous stone removal of kidney stones: Preliminary report. Mayo Clin Proc 1982; 57: 615. PMid:7121066 5. Clayman RV. Techniques in percutaneous removal of renal calculi. Urol 1984; 23: 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(84)90236-X 6. Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Günther R, et al. Percutane- ous stone manuplation. J Urol 1981; 125: 463. PMid:7218439 7. Wicham JEA, Kellett MJ. Percutaneous nephrolitho- tomy. Br J Urol 1981; 53: 297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1981.tb03181.x 8. Lingeman JE, Newmark JR, Wong MYC. Classificati- on and management of staghorn calculi. In Smith AD (ed): Contraversies in Endourology, Philadelpia, WB Saunders, 1995; 136-144. 9. Paik ML, Wainstein MA, Spirnak P, Hampel N, Res- nick MI. Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 1998; 159(2): 374-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63922-3 10. Wolf JS, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolitho- tomy. What is its role in 1997?. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24(1): 43-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70353-0 11. Chandhoke PS, Albala DM, Clayman RV. Long-term comparison of renal function in patients with solitary kidneys and/or moderate renal insufficiency undergo- ing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or percutane- ous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1992; 147(5): 1226-30. PMid:1569654 12. Lashley DB, Fuchs EF. Urologist-acquired renal Access for percutaneous renal surgery. Urology 1998; 51: 927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00101-0 13. Antonelli JA, Pearle MS. Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am 2013; 40(1): 99- 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2012.09.012 PMid:23177638 14. Chongruksut W, Lojanapiwat B, Tawichasri C, et al. Predictors for kidney stones recurrence following ext- racorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percu- taneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95(3): 342-8. PMid:225