Journals / Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Preemptive gabapentin in patients undergoing surgery for supratentorial tumour

Supratentoryal tümör cerrahisinde preemptif gabapentin

Pages
126–133
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It also decreased analgesic consumption after surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of gabapentin, which has peripheral and central antinociceptive action in neuropathic and inflammatory pain that starts with surgical incision, to that of placebo regarding the effects on trama- dol consumption, tracheal extubation time, visual pain score and adverse events.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Forty patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection were randomly assigned into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also decreased analgesic consumption after surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of gabapentin, which has peripheral and central antinociceptive action in neuropathic and inflammatory pain that starts with surgical incision, to that of placebo regarding the effects on trama- dol consumption, tracheal extubation time, visual pain score and adverse events. Material and Methods: Forty patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection were randomly assigned into two groups. In group K (n=20) one placebo capsule and Group G 600 mg gabapentin (n=20) were administered one hour before surgery. All patients received standard anesthesia regimens. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), total remifentanil consumption of the patients were eva- luated and recorded per 30 minutes in perioperative period. Before the end of operation 1 mg/kg PCA was started with loading dose and patients were taken to recovery room after obtaining response to verbal sti- mulus. All patients received patient-controlled anal- gesia with tramadol with a 25 mg initial loading dose and 30- min lockout interval. Tramadol consumption, VAS score and side effects were recorded at 1., 2., 3., 6., 12. and 24. hours after the operation. Results: Postoperative total tramadol consumption was 271.0±59.8 mg in group K and 218.7±71.1 mg in Group G. Tramadol consumption in group K was sig- nificantly higher than Group G. Patients in the ga- bapentin group had significantly lower pain scores at all time intervals in comparison to placebo group. Intraoperative total remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in group G than in Group K. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was less frequent in group G compared with group K. Conclusion: The administration of gabapentin to patients undergoing supratentorial tumor resection was effective for acute postoperative pain. It also decreased analgesic consumption after surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amacımız; cerrahi insizyon ile başlayan nöropatik ve inflamatuvar ağrıda, pe- riferik ve santral antinosiseptif etkinliği gösterilen gabapentinin postoperatif tramadol tüketimi, eks- tübasyon süresi, vizüel ağrı skorlarına etkisini ve oluşabilecek yan etkilerini; gabapentinin tek başı- na kullanımı ve plasebo grubu ile karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Supratentorial tümör rezeksi- yonu planlanan 40 hasta rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Operasyondan 1 saat önce; Grup K’ye 1 adet pla- sebo kapsül, grup G’ye 600 mg gabapentin tablet oral olarak verildi. Tüm olgulara standart aneste- zi verildi. Peroperatif 30 dk. aralıklar ile OAB’ları, KAH’ları ve remifentanil tüketim miktarları kayde- dildi. Olgulara, operasyon bitimine doğru 1 mg/kg hasta kontrollü analjezinin yükleme dozu yapıldı ve sözlü uyaranlara yanıt alındıktan sonra derlen- me odasına alındı. Tüm olgulara HKA ile tramadol uygulandı (yükleme dozu 25 mg, kilitli kalma süresi 30 dk.). Operasyondan sonraki 1., 2., 3., 6., 12. ve 24. saatlerde, vizüel ağrı skoru, tramadol tüketimi ve yan etkiler takip edilip, kaydedildi. Bulgular: Postoperatif dönemdeki toplam trama- dol tüketimi; Grup K’de 271.0±59.8 mg, grup G’de 218.7±71.1 mg olarak bulundu. Grup K’deki toplam tramadol tüketimi grup G’ye göre anlamlı yüksekti. Gabapentin grubundaki VAS değerleri plasebo gru- buyla karşılaştırıldığında tüm ölçüm zamanlarında dikkate değer bir şekilde düşüktü. Grup G’nin top- lam remifentanil tüketimi Grup K’ya göre anlamlı olarak düşük bulundu. Postoperatif bulantı-kusma grup K ile karşılaştırıldığında grup G’de daha az sıklıkta gözlendi. Sonuç: Supratentorial tümör cerrahisi geçirecek hastalarda gabapentin uygulanması postoperatif dönemde etkin bir analjezi sağladığı gibi bu dö- nemdeki analjezik gereksinimini de azaltmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, B., TURGUT, N., ALTAN, H. A., ALİ, A., KAYA, M. (2012). Preemptive gabapentin in patients undergoing surgery for supratentorial tumour. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 126–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/291843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Dickenson AH. Mechanisms of the analgesic actions of opiates and opioids. Br Med Bull 1991;47:690-702. PMid:1665377 2. HJ Mc Quay. Preemptive Analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/69.1.1 PMid:1637592 3. Kisssin I. Preemptive analgesia. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1138-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200010000- 00040 PMid:11020772 4. Serpell MG. Neuropathic pain study group: Gabapentin in neuropathic pain syndromes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial. Pain 2002;99:557-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00255-5 5. Rice AS, Maton S. Gabapentin in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study. Pain 2001;94:215-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00407-9 6. Luo ZD, Calcutt NA, Hıguera ES et al. Injury Type-Specific Calcium Channel α2δ-1 Subunit Up-Regulation in Rat Neuropathic Pain Models Correlates with Antiallodynic Effects of Gaba- pentin. The Journal of Pharmacology and Expe- rımental Therapeutıcs 2002;303(3):1199-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.102.041574 PMid:12438544 7. Luo ZD, Chaplan SR, Higuera ES et al. Upregula- tion of dorsal root ganglion (alpha)2(delta) cal- cium channel subunit and its correlation with allodynia in spinal nevre-injured rats. J Neurosci 2001;21:1868-1875. PMid:11245671 8. Dahl JB, Kahlet H. The value of pre-emptive analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. BJA 1993;70:434-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/70.4.434 PMid:8499204 9. Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outco- me from surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1123-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200010000- 00038 PMid:11020770 10. Katz J, Kavanagh BP, et al. Preemptive Analge- sia Clinical Evidence of Neuroplasticity Contri- buting to Postoperative Pain. Anesthesiology 1992:77;439-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199209000- 00006 PMid:1519781 11. Coderre TJ, Grimes RW, Melzac R. Autotomy af- ter nerve sections in the rat is influenced by to- nic descending inhibition from locus coerulus. Neurosci Lett 1986;67:82-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(86)90213-2 12. Cliff K, Philipp Lirk, Robin A, et al. Jenkins. The Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia for Acute Pos- toperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg 2005;100:757-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000144428. 98767.0E 13. Gottschalk A, Smith DS. New concepts in acute pain therapy: preemptive analgesia. Am Fam Physician 2001;63(10):1979-84. PMi