Journals / Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

The results of postoperative chemoradiotheapy in gastric carcinoma patients: Bulent ecevit university experience

Mide kanserli hastalarda postoperatif kemoradyoterapi sonuçları: Bülent ecevit üniversitesi deneyimi

Pages
139–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Median overall survival and disease-fee sur- vival were 28.3, and 21 months, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The treatment results of postopeative chemoradi- otherapy in patients with gastric carcinoma were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 77 patients with gast- ric carcinoma, treated with postoperative chemoradiothe- rapy between 2007-2011, were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Median overall survival and disease-fee sur- vival were 28.3, and 21 months, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The treatment results of postopeative chemoradi- otherapy in patients with gastric carcinoma were evaluated. Material and Methods: A total of 77 patients with gast- ric carcinoma, treated with postoperative chemoradiothe- rapy between 2007-2011, were evaluated retrospectively. Chemoradiotherapy was applied in accordance with the Integroup-0116 study protocol. Total 45 Gy radiotherapy was delivered to the gastric bed and regional lymphatic no- des and 50.4 Gy was given to patients with positive surgical margins after 3-dimensional conformal planning. Results: Forty-six of the patients were male (59.7 %), and 31 of the patients were female (40.3 %) with a median age of 59 (31-78). Median overall survival and disease-fee sur- vival were 28.3, and 21 months, respectively. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 43.8 % and 41.7 %, respectively. Locoregional recurrence was detected in 10 (13 %), distant metastasis was detected in 22 (28.6 %) and both locoregional and distant metastasis were detected in 3 (3.9 %) of patients. During chemoradiotherapy grade 1-2 hematological toxicity was seen in 23 (30 %) patients, grade 3-4 hematological toxicity in 46 (59.7 %) patients, grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicity in 30 (39 %) patients, and grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity in 11 (14.3 %) pa- tients. While in the univariate analysis lymph node stage and percentage of positive lymph nodes were found to be prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival, in the multivariate analysis type of lymph node dissection and percentage of positive lymph nodes were found to be prog- nostic factors that are correlated with overall and disease- free survival. Conclusion: Chemoradiotherapy improved loco-regional control rather than reduction of distant metastases. Acute es- pecially hematologic side effects were commonly observed.

Özet

Amaç: Mide kanseri tanısıyla postoperatif kemoradyoterapi uyguladığımız olgularımızın tedavi sonuçları değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2007-2011 yılları arasında postoperatif kemoradyoterapi uygulanan toplam 77 mide kanseri tanı- lı olgu geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Kemoradyoterapi, Intergroup-0116 çalışma protokolüne göre uygulandı. Üç boyutlu konformal planlama sonrası mide loju ve bölgesel lenfatiklere 45 Gy, cerrahi sınır pozitif olanlara 50.4 Gy radyoterapi verildi. Bulgular: Olguların 46’si erkek (% 59.7), 31’i kadın (% 40.3) olup, ortanca yaş 59 (dağılım 31-78) idi. Ortanca genel sağkalım ve hastalıksız sağkalım süreleri sırasıyla 28.3 ve 21 aydı. Üç yıllık genel ve hastalıksız sağkalım oranları sı- rasıyla % 43.8 ve % 41.7 bulundu. Takipleri sırasında 10 olguda (% 13) lokal-bölgesel yineleme, 22 olguda (% 28.6) uzak organ metastazı, 3 olguda (% 3.9) ise hem lokal- bölgesel yineleme hem de uzak organ metastazı saptandı. Kemoradyoterapi süresi boyunca grad 1-2 hematolojik yan etki 23 (% 30) olguda, 3-4 hematolojik yan etki 46 (% 59.7) olguda, grad 1-2 gastrointestinal yan etki 30 (% 39) olgu- da, grad 3-4 gastrointestinal yan etki 11 (% 14.3) olguda görüldü. Tek değişkenli analizde lenf nodu evresi ve lenf nodu tutulum oranı hem genel hem de hastalıksız sağkalım üzerine etkili prognostik faktörler olarak bulunurken, çok değişkenli analizde lenf nodu diseksiyon tipi ve lenf nodu tutulum oranı genel ve hastalıksız sağkalım ile ilişkili prog- nostik faktörler olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Kemoradyoterapinin lokal kontrol üzerinde etkili olduğu, uzak metastaz gelişimini engellemede ise yetersiz kaldığı saptanmıştır. Erken dönem özellikle hematolojik yan etkiler sık gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKKAL, B. H., ELMAS, Ö., GÜLTEKİN, F. A., ENGİN, H., BİLİR, C., BAKKAL, Y. T. (2014). The results of postoperative chemoradiotheapy in gastric carcinoma patients: Bulent ecevit university experience. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 139–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/291830

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108.
  2. Yalcin S. Gastric cancer in Turkey-a bridge between west and east. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2009;3:29-32
  3. Gunderson LL. Gastric cancer patterns of relapse after sur- gical resection. Semin Radiat Oncol 2002;12:150-161.
  4. Gundeson LL, Sosin H. Adenocarcinoma of the sto- mach: areas of failure in a re-operation series (second or symptomatic look) clinicopathologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;8:1-11.
  5. Landry J, Tepper JE, Wood WC, et al. Patterns of failu- re following curative resection of gastric carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990;19:1357-1362.
  6. Earle CC, Maroun JA. Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer in non-Asian pa- tients: revisiting a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:1059-1064.
  7. Mari E, Floriani I, Tinazzi A, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric can- cer: a meta-analysis of published randomised trials. A study of the GISCAD. Ann Oncol 2000;11:837-843.
  8. Panzini I, Gianni L, Fattori PP, et al. Adjuvant chemot- herapy in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and a comparison with previous meta-analysis. Tumori 2002;88:21-27
  9. MacDonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemo- radiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Eng J Med 2001;345:725-730.
  10. Smalley SR, Gunderson L, Tepper J, et al. Gastric sur- gical adjuvant radiotherapy consensus report: rationale and treatment implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;52:283-293.
  11. Tepper JE, Gunderson LL. Radiation treatment para- meters in the adjuvant postoperative therapy of gastric cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2002;12:187-195.
  12. Leong T, Willis D, Joon DL, et al. 3D conformal ra- diotherapy for gastric cancer results of a comparative planning study. Radiother Oncol 2005;74:301-306.