Journals / Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Discrepancy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings, Symptom Severity and Functional Status in Knee Osteoarthritis

Diz Osteoartritinde Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme Bulguları, Semptom Şiddeti ve Fonksiyonel Durum Arasındaki Uyumsuzluk

Pages
134–139
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some factors like thigh muscle strength of the patients, or mental and the physical status, and pain threshold may affect the level of impairment of health or the aspect of the patient to the health, individually which may lead to discrepancy of radiological findings and symptom severity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In clinical practice, patients with discrepancy of radiological findings and symptom severity are frequent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim of this study was to investigate the possible discrepancy of magnetic resonance imaging findings, and symptom severity and functional status of patients with knee osteoarthritis.Material and Methods: 40 patients were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some factors like thigh muscle strength of the patients, or mental and the physical status, and pain threshold may affect the level of impairment of health or the aspect of the patient to the health, individually which may lead to discrepancy of radiological findings and symptom severity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In clinical practice, patients with discrepancy of radiological findings and symptom severity are frequent. Aim of this study was to investigate the possible discrepancy of magnetic resonance imaging findings, and symptom severity and functional status of patients with knee osteoarthritis.Material and Methods: 40 patients were included in the study. Patients were selected by searching the archives of the 2015, and by excluding the patients who didn't meet the criteria for our study. Patients without the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis, who didn't have written consents for using their clinical data, who didn't have knee magnetic resonance images, who didn't fill WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires, and who didn't have visual analog scale result for pain, were excluded. For evaluating WORMS, images are scored for 14 independent articular features. Correlations among the variables were analyzed.Results: Mean age of the study group was 57.35±5.88 years, and mean BMI was 28.68±3.54. There was no difference between males and females according to mean age, and mean BMI (p>0.05). According to the other variables there was no difference between males and females, except the total and subscale scores of WORMS. Total and subscale scores of WORMS were significantly higher in females than males (p<0.05). When the correlations among the variables were analyzed there was significant and positive correlation between age, and BMI and total scores of WORMS (p<0.05). There was no significant correlation between the parameters showing the symptom severity, and WORMS (p>0.05).Conclusion: Discrepancy of magnetic resonance imaging findings, and symptom severity and functional status is more frequent than the expected. Some factors like thigh muscle strength of the patients, or mental and the physical status, and pain threshold may affect the level of impairment of health or the aspect of the patient to the health, individually which may lead to discrepancy of radiological findings and symptom severity.

Özet

Amaç: Klinik pratikte radyolojik bulgular ile semptom şiddeti arasında uyumsuzluk olan hastalar çok sıktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı diz osteoartriti olan hastalarda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme bulguları ile semptom şiddeti ve fonksiyonel durum arasındaki olası uyumsuzluğu incelemekti.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 40 hasta dâhil edildi. Hastalar 2015 yılının arşivi taranarak ve çalışmanın kriterlerini karşılamayan hastalar dışlanarak seçildi. Diz osteoartriti tanısı olmayan hastalar, klinik verilerinin kullanımı için yazılı onamı olmayan hastalar, diz manyetik rezonans görüntüleri olmayan hastalar, WOMAC ve SF-36 anketlerini doldurmamış olan hastalar ve ağrı için görsel analog skala sonucu olmayan hastalar dışlandı. WORMS değerlendirmesi için görüntüler 14 bağımsız eklem karakteristiği için puanlandı. Değişkenler arasındaki korelasyonlar analiz edildi.Bulgular: Çalışma grubunun ortalama yaşı 57,35±5,88 yıl ve ortalama VKİ değeri 28,68±3,54'tü. Erkekler ve kadınlar arasında ortalama yaş ve ortalama VKİ açısından fark yoktu (p>0,05). WORMS toplam ve alt skala puanları hariç diğer değişkenler için erkeler ve kadınlar arasında fark yoktu. WORMS toplam ve alt skala puanları kadınlarda erkeklere göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p 0,05).Sonuç: Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme bulguları ile semptom şiddeti ve fonksiyonel durum arasındaki uyumsuzluk beklenenden daha fazladır. Hastaların bacak kas kuvveti veya psikolojik ve fiziksel durum ve ağrı eşiği gibi bazı faktörler sağlığın bozulma derecesini veya hastanın sağlığa bakış açısını, kişisel olarak radyolojik bulgular ve semptom şiddeti arasında uyumsuzluğa neden olabilecek şekilde etkileyebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLHANLI, İ. (2016). Discrepancy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings, Symptom Severity and Functional Status in Knee Osteoarthritis. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 134–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/291690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Gobbi A, Karnatzikos G, Mahajan V, et al. Platelet-rich plasma treatment in symptomatic patients with knee osteoarthritis: preliminary results in a group of active patients. Sports Health 2012;4(2):162-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738111431801
  2. Peat G, Thomas E, Duncan R, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P. Clinical classification criteria for knee osteoarthri- tis: performance in the general population and primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1363-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.051482
  3. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological Assessment of Osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.16.4.494
  4. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:177-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2003.11.003
  5. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Stitt LW. Validation of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoar- thritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
  6. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The SF-36 health status sur- vey: 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  7. Sowers MF, Hayes C, Jamadar D, et al. Magnetic reso- nance-detected subchondral bone marrow and cartilage defect characteristics associated with pain and X-ray- defined knee Osteoarthritis. Osteo Arthritis and Cartilage 2003;11:387-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00080-3
  8. Lachance L, Sowers MF, Jamadar D, Jannausch M, Hochberg M, Crutchfield M. The experience of pain and emergent osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:527-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/joca.2000.0429
  9. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. Kısa form-36'nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi 1999;12(2):102-6.
  10. Pelletier JP, Raynauld JP, Abram F, Haraoui B, Cho- quette D, Martel-Pelletier J. A new non-invasive meth- od to assess synovitis severity in relation to symptoms and cartilage volume loss in knee osteoarthritis patients using MRI. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2008;16:8-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.007
  11. Lo GH, McAlindon TH, Niu J, et al. Bone marrow le- sions and joint effusion are strongly and independently associated with weight-bearing pain in knee osteoar- thritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoar- thritis and Cartilage 2