Journals / Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Incidence and Severity of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and its Risk Factors in Perimenopausal Women

Perimenopozal Kadınlarda Pelvik Organ Prolapsusu Sıklığı, Şiddeti ve Risk Faktörleri

Pages
148–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that weight loss with lifestyle modifications and appropriate delivery management are critical for pelvic organ prolapse.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Pelvic organ prolapse is a commonly encountered socioeconomical condition in the perimenopausal period that women hesitate to complain about to their physicians.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We included 1860 perimenopausal women admitted to the gynecology outpatient clinics between July and December 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that weight loss with lifestyle modifications and appropriate delivery management are critical for pelvic organ prolapse.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Pelvic organ prolapse is a commonly encountered socioeconomical condition in the perimenopausal period that women hesitate to complain about to their physicians. Evaluation of patients who have risk factors for this condition is crucial for both diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse in perimenopausal women. Material and Methods: We included 1860 perimenopausal women admitted to the gynecology outpatient clinics between July and December 2014. The age, height, weight, educational status, parity, delivery mode, birthweight, presence of pelvic organ prolapse, and the POP-Q patient score were retrospectively recorded. Results: Pelvic organ prolapse was observed in 1232 (66.2%) patients at different stages and in 487 (26.2%) of patients at stage ≥2. Patients with pelvic organ prolapse were elder (p<0.001), more overweight (p<0.001), had higher parity (p=0.036), had vaginal delivery more frequently (p=0.022), and also had overweight babies more frequently (p<0.001). The body mass index (BMI) (OR, 4.1; p<0.001), vaginal delivery (OR, 3.6; p=0.003), and birthweight (OR, 1.3; p<0.001) were found to be independent predictors for pelvic organ prolapse. Moreover, patients at stage ≥2 were more overweight (p<0.001), had vaginal delivery more frequently (p=0.002), and had overweight babies more frequently (p<0.001). The BMI (OR, 7.6; p<0.001) and maximum birthweight (OR 3.1, p<0.001) were independent predictors for patients with stage ≥2 pelvic organ prolapse. Conclusion: BMI, vaginal delivery, and birth weight were found to be the risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse. Also, BMI and birth weight were the risk factors for stage ≥2 prolapse. We concluded that weight loss with lifestyle modifications and appropriate delivery management are critical for pelvic organ prolapse.

Özet

Amaç: Pelvik organ prolapsusu perimenopozal kadınlarda sık görülen, kadınların doktora şikayet olarak belirtmekten çekindikleri sosyoekonomik bir sorundur. Özellikle risk faktörlerini taşıyan hastaların detaylı sorgulanması ve muayenesi, tanı ve tedavi açısından çok önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı perimenopozal kadınlarda pelvik organ prolapsusu risk faktörlerinin araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya Temmuz 2014 ve Aralık 2014 tarihleri arasında jinekoloji polikliniğine başvuran, perimenopozal dönemdeki 1860 hasta dahil edildi. Retrospektif olarak hastaların yaşı, boyu, kilosu, eğitim durumu, doğum sayıları, doğum şekli, doğum ağırlığı, pelvik organ prolapsusu varlığı ve pelvik organ prolapsusu olan hastalar için POP-Q sınıflaması kaydedildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 1232’sinde (%66,2) farklı evrelerde pelvik organ prolapsusu tespit edildi. Evre≥2 hastalar, tüm hasta grubunun %26,2’si (n=487) idi. Pelvik organ prolapsuslu hastalar daha yaşlı (p<0,001), daha kilolu (p<0,001), doğum sayıları daha yüksek (p=0,036), daha kilolu bebek doğurmuş (p<0,001), daha fazla vajinal doğumu olan (p=0,022) hastalardı. Vücut kütle indeksi (OR 4,1, p<0,001), vajinal doğum (OR 3,6, p=0,003) ve doğum ağırlığı (OR 2,3, p<0,001) pelvik organ prolapsusu için bağımsız öngörüdürücü parametreler olarak belirlendi. Ayrıca evre≥2 hastalar, daha kilolu (p<0,001), daha kilolu bebek doğurmuş (p<0,001) ve daha fazla vajinal doğumu olan (p=0,002) hastalardı. Evre ≥2 genital prolapsus için vücut kütle indeksi (OR 7,6, p<0,001) ve maksimum doğum ağırlığı (OR 3,1, p<0,001) bağımsız öngörüdürücü idi. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda vücut kütle indeksi, vajinal doğum ve doğum ağırlığı pelvik organ prolapsusu için risk faktörleri olarak bulundu. Ayrıca vücut kütle indeksi ve doğum ağırlığı, evre ≥2 olan hastalar için de risk faktörü idi. Bu bulgular sonucunda, yaşam tarzı değişikliği ile kilo kontrolünün ve düzgün bir doğum yönetiminin pelvik organ prolapsusu için kritik öneme sahip olduğu sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, E., ÇAKMAK, B. D., GENCER, F. K., BOYAMA, B. A. (2018). Incidence and Severity of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and its Risk Factors in Perimenopausal Women. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 148–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/291654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Voorham-van der Zalm PJ, Lycklama ANGA, Elzevier HW, Putter H, Pelger RC. Diagnostic investigation of the pelvic floor: a helpful tool in the approach in patients with complaints of micturition, defecation, and/ or sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2008;5:864-71
  2. Patel DA, Xu X, Thomason AD, et al. Childbirth and pelvic flor dysfunction: an epidemiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportunities at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;195:23-8
  3. Weber AM, Richter HE. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstetrics&Gynecology. 2005;106:615-34
  4. Milsom I, Altman D, Herbison P, et al.Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) Incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Paris: Health Publications Ltd; 2009. 35-111
  5. Mouritsen L, Larsen JP. Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:122-7
  6. Ozel B, White T, Urwitz-Lane R, Minaglia S. The impact of pelvic organ prolapse on sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:14-7
  7. PhillipsCH, Anthony F, Benyon C, et al. Collagen metabolism in the uterosacral ligaments and vaginal skin in women with uterine prolapse. BJOG. 2006;113:39- 46
  8. NygaardI, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic flor disorder in US women. JAM. 2008;300:1311-6
  9. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372-9
  10. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:299-305
  11. Kuncharapu I, Majeroni BA, Johnson DW. Pelvic organ prolapse. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81:1111-7
  12. Schon Ybarra MA, Gutman RE, Rini D, Handa VL. Etiology of post-utero sacral suspension neuro pathies. Int Urogynaecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:1067-71
  13. Low LK, Tumbarello JA. Fallingout: Authoritative knowledge and women’s experiences with pelvic organ prolapse. J Midwifery Wom Heal 2012;57:489-94
  14. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Women’s Health Initiative: Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:489- 97
  15. Hendrix S, Clark A, Nygaard I, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiativ