Journals / Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Immersion vs construction: The portrayals of culture in Indonesian EFL learning paradigm

Pages
283–304
Publication Date
2018-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Yes Author 2 Author (Last name, First name) SumardiAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, IndonesiaCorresponding author (Yes/No) No Author 3 Author (Last name, First name) Tarjana, Sri SamiatiAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia Corresponding author (Yes/No) No Author 4 Author (Last name, First name) Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Immersion vs construction: The portrayals of culture in Indonesian EFL learning paradigm The status quo of English as the world lingua franca (Choi, 2016; Fang, 2017; Kusumaningputri & Widodo, 2018; Liu & Fang, 2017), the increasing role of English as an additional language for nowadays Indonesian generation (Lauder, 2008), and the nature of Indonesian EFL students as multicultural people (Hamied, 2012; Sukyadi, 2015) became the bases sensitizing the role of culture in Indonesian EFL learning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Yes Author 2 Author (Last name, First name) SumardiAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, IndonesiaCorresponding author (Yes/No) No Author 3 Author (Last name, First name) Tarjana, Sri SamiatiAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia Corresponding author (Yes/No) No Author 4 Author (Last name, First name) Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Culture · English as a lingua franca · English as an additional language

Özet

Öz Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt. Immersion vs construction: The portrayals of culture in Indonesian EFL learning paradigm The status quo of English as the world lingua franca (Choi, 2016; Fang, 2017; Kusumaningputri & Widodo, 2018; Liu & Fang, 2017), the increasing role of English as an additional language for nowadays Indonesian generation (Lauder, 2008), and the nature of Indonesian EFL students as multicultural people (Hamied, 2012; Sukyadi, 2015) became the bases sensitizing the role of culture in Indonesian EFL learning. As regards, this study focused on two objectives pertinent to how Indonesian EFL teachers defined culture and conceptualized language-culture relationship, and how the portrayals of culture were nuanced in their paradigm of EFL learning. 15 EFL teachers were engaged and interviewed. As revealed, five varieties of culture-related definitions were shared. They referred to culture as social products, social knowledge, ways of living, communicative behaviors and a communicative discourse construct. Four indicators of language-culture relationship were subsequently conceptualized into language to express culture, language as the cultural symbol, language framed by culture, and language as a cultural mediator. In turn, 10 teachers holding modernist perspective and 5 teachers holding postmodernist perspective provided diverse portrayals of culture in Indonesian EFL learning. The last, the given critical implication supported the latter instead of the former perspective for Indonesian EFL learning. Information about Author(s)* Author 1 Author (Last name, First name) Morganna, RulyAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, IndonesiaCorresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author. Yes Author 2 Author (Last name, First name) SumardiAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, IndonesiaCorresponding author (Yes/No) No Author 3 Author (Last name, First name) Tarjana, Sri SamiatiAffiliated institution (University) Universitas Sebelas MaretCountry IndonesiaEmail address [email protected] & Rank Graduate School of English Education Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia Corresponding author (Yes/No) No Author 4 Author (Last name, First name) Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No)

🔖

Cite This Article

MORGANNA, R., SUMARDİ, S., TARJANA, S. S. (2018). Immersion vs construction: The portrayals of culture in Indonesian EFL learning paradigm. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 283–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/29165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen, L. Q. (2004). Implementing a culture portfolio project within a constructivist paradigm. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02196.x
  2. Assemi, A., Saleh, S., Asayeshh, M. E., & Janfaza, E. (2012). Culture within Language. International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, 33, 78–82.
  3. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Frankfurt Lodge, UK: Multilingual Matters LTD. Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
  4. Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills. USA: HBJ Publishers.
  5. Choi, L. J. (2016). Revisiting the issue of native speakerism: “I don”t want to speak like a native speaker of English’. Language and Education, 30(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1089887
  6. Crozet, C., & Liddicoat, A. J. (1999). The challenge of intercultural language teaching: Engaging with culture in the classroom. In J. Lo Bianco, A. J. Liddicoat, & C. Crozet (Eds.), Striving for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education (p. 113). Melbourne: Language Australia. Dervin, F., Gajardo, A., & Lavanchy, A. (2011). Politics of Interculturality (1st ed.). 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Elmes, D. (2013). The relationship between language and culture. 鹿屋体育大学学術研究紀要, 46, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02412.x
  7. Fang, F. G. (2017). World Englishes or English as a Lingua Franca: Where does English in China stand? English Today, 33(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078415000668
  8. FitzGerald, H. (1999). What culture do we teach? In J. Lo Bianco, A. J. Liddicoat, & C. Crozet (Eds.), Striving for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education. (p. 127). Melbourne: Language Australia. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. The interpretation of Language andMeaning. London: Edward Arnold. Hamied, F. A. (2012). English in Multicultural and Multilingual Indonesian Education. Multilingual Education, 1(English as an International Language in Asia: Implications for Language Education), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-45