Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in the Vestibular Migraine

Pages
63–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To support the diagnosis of VM, VEMPs are easy and cost‑effective tests.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the subclinical vestibular dysfunction of patients with vestibular migraine (VM) in the interattack period who had no vestibular symptoms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between January 2017 and January 2018, 116 patients (aged 18–62 years) were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To support the diagnosis of VM, VEMPs are easy and cost‑effective tests.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the subclinical vestibular dysfunction of patients with vestibular migraine (VM) in the interattack period who had no vestibular symptoms. We assessed ascending utricular and descending saccular pathways using cervical vestibular‑evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and ocular vestibular‑evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) in patients with VM and a healthy control group and then compared the electrophysiologic findings with each other. Materials and Methods: Between January 2017 and January 2018, 116 patients (aged 18–62 years) were enrolled in the study. The study group consisted of 68 women with VM and the control group comprised 48 healthy women. Results: For cVEMP findings, the mean left ear P1 latency of the VM group was statistically significantly longer than that of the control group (P = 0.024; P 0.05). Amplitude asymmetry ratios (AARs) were not statistically significantly different between the two groups in cVEMP (P > 0.05). In terms of oVEMP findings, no statistically significant difference was found in the right ear parameters of N1, P1, P1‑N1 intervals, and amplitudes of the VM and the control groups (P > 0.05). The left ear oVEMPs of the VM group showed absent responses in 12 cases and were statistically significant compared with the control group (P = 0.037; P < 0.05). The AARs were significantly greater for the the VM group than the control group in oVEMP (P = 0.006; P < 0.05). Conclusion: These electrophysiologic findings suggest that peripheral vestibular structures such as the utricle, saccule and also other central vestibular structures might be affected in VM. Patients with VM had subclinical vestibular dysfunction despite being in the interattack period. To support the diagnosis of VM, VEMPs are easy and cost‑effective tests.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAR, B., BERKİTEN, G., AKAN, O., SALTÜRK, Z., GÜRPINAR, B., KARAKETİR, S., KUMRAL, T. L., UYAR, Y., TUNA, Ö. B. (2020). Analysis of Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in the Vestibular Migraine. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 63–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/290616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Furman JM, Balaban CD. Vestibular migraine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015;1343:90‑6
  2. Brandt T. A chameleon among the episodic vertigo syndromes: ‘Migrainous vertigo’ or ‘vestibular migraine.’ Cephalalgia 2004;24:81‑2
  3. Yetiser S, Gok MH, Kutukcu Y, Ince D. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in a female population with migraine. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;68:207‑10
  4. Lempert T, Neuhauser H. Epidemiology of vertigo, migraine and vestibular migraine. J Neurol 2009;256:333‑8
  5. Vitkovic J, Paine M, Rance G. Neuro‑otological findings in patients with migraine‑and non migraine‑related dizziness. Audiol Neurootol 2008;13:113‑22
  6. Celebisoy N, Gökçay F, Sirin H, Biçak N. Migrainous vertigo: Clinical, oculographic and posturographic findings. Cephalalgia 2008;28:72‑7
  7. Espinosa‑Sanchez JM, Lopez‑Escamez JA. New insights into pathophysiology of vestibular migraine. Front Neurol 2015;6:12
  8. Taylor RL, Zagami AS, Gibson WP, Black DA, Watson SR, Halmagyi MG, et al. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to sound and vibration: Characteristics in vestibular migraine that enable separation from Meniere’s disease. Cephalalgia 2012;32:213‑25
  9. Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, Waterston J, Seemungal B, Carey J, et al. Vestibular migraine: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the Bárány society and the International Headache Society. J Vestib Res 2012;22:167‑72
  10. Baier B, Stieber N, Dieterich M. Vestibular‑evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular migraine. J Neurol 2009;256:1447‑54
  11. Baier B, Dieterich M. Vestibular‑evoked myogenic potentials in ‘‘vestibular migraine’’ and Meniere’s disease: A sign of an electrophysiological link? Ann NY Acad Sci 2009;1164:324‑7
  12. Boldingh MI, Ljøstad U, Mygland A, Monstad P. Vestibular sensitivity in vestibular migraine: VEMPs and motion sickness susceptibility. Cephalalgia 2011;31:1211‑9
  13. Zuniga MG, Janky KL, Schubert MC, Carey JP. Can vestibular‑evoked myogenic potentials help differentiate Ménière disease from vestibular migraine? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:788‑96
  14. Iwasaki S, Smulders YE, Burgess AM, McGarvie LA, Macdougall HG, Halmagyi GM, et al. Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to bone‑conducted vibration of the midline forehead at Fz. A new indicator of unilateral otolithic loss. Audiol Neurootol 2008;13:396‑404
  15. Chihara Y, Iwasaki S, Ushio M, Murofushi T. Vestibular‑evoked extraocular potentials by air‑conducted sound: another clinical test for vestib