Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2018 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: Experience in 106 patients

Pages
91–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is most cost-effective procedure to choose if the pain recurs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of our study is to analyse the results of percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We inspected the results of 106 patients with the diagnoses of idiopathic neuralgia that treated with percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is most cost-effective procedure to choose if the pain recurs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of our study is to analyse the results of percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Methods: We inspected the results of 106 patients with the diagnoses of idiopathic neuralgia that treated with percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy retrospectively. The scores of visual analog scale(VAS) were noted preoperative and post- operative periods at 1 st , 3 rd , 6 th and 12 th months and were used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean age of 106 patients was 67.31±8.85 years. Duration of symptoms was 19.1±13.1 months. Duration of symptoms did not change significantly according to gender (p=0.755), or site of trigeminal pain (p=0.158). There was not any statistical sig- nificance between gender, effected branch of trigemial nerve and side of the pain. Preoperative mean VAS score was 9.6±0.75. Postoperative mean VAS score values were 3.25±2.44 at first month, 3.23±2.43 at third months, 3.12±2.78 at sixth months and 2.59±3.18 at postoperative twelfth months. We found statistically significant difference between preoperative and postopera- tive 1 st , 3 rd , 6 th and 12 th months VAS scores (p<0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy is the minimally invasive treatment modality with lower com- plication rates and it has a high rate of efficacy when compared with invasive methods. It is most cost-effective procedure to choose if the pain recurs.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜSLÜ, H., SÜSLÜ, H. T., ÖZDOĞAN, S., GÜÇLÜ, B., DÜZKALIR, A. H. (2018). Percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: Experience in 106 patients. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 91–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/290547

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 9–160.
  2. Teixeira MJ, Siqueira SRDT, Almeida GM. Percutaneous radiof- requency rhizotomy and neurovascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve for the treatment of facial pain. Arq Neurop- siquiatr 2206; 64: 983-989. [CrossRef] Kanpolat Y, Berk C, Savas A, Bekar A. Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency rhizotomy in the management of patients with trigeminal neuralgia due to multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142: 685-689. [CrossRef] Missios S, Mohammadi AM, Barnett GH. Percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2014; 25: 751-762. [CrossRef] Zhang LW, Liu YG, Wu CY, Xu SJ, Zhu SG. Radiofrequency ther- mocoagulation rhizotomy for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011; 124: 3726-3730.
  3. Tolle T, Dukes E, Sadosky A. Patient burden of trigeminal neu- ralgia: results from a cross-sectional survey of health state im- pairment and treatment patterns in six European countries. Pain Pract 2006; 6: 153-160. [CrossRef] Nie F, Su D, Shi Y, Chen J, et al. A prospective study of X-ray im- aging combined with skin stimulation potential-guided percu- taneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Med 2014; 15: 1464-1469. [CrossRef] Kanpolat Y, Ugur HC. Systematic review of ablative neurosurgical techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: E601. [CrossRef] Singh S, Verma R, Kumar M, Rastogi V, Bogra J. Experience with conventional radiofrequency thermorhizotomy in patients with failed medical management for trigeminal neuralgia. Korean J Pain 2014; 27: 260-265. [CrossRef] Burchiel KJ, Clarke H, Haglund M. Long term efficacy of micro- vascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 35-38. [CrossRef] Dhople AA, Adams JR, Maggio WW, Naqvi SA, Regine WF, Kwok Y. Long-term outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for classic trigeminal neuralgia: implications of treatment and critical review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 351-358. [CrossRef] Pamir MN, Peker S. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: A long-term follow-up study. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2006; 49: 342-346. [CrossRef] Sindou M. Trigeminal neuralgia: a plea for microvascular decompression as the first surgical option. Anatomy should prevail.