Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease

Pages
44–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the FOG-Q is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of FOG in PD patients who are native Turkish speakers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Freezing of gait (FOG) is one of the disabling symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Following the translation process, 48 consecutive patients with PD were evaluated using the Turkish version of FOG-Q, the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), modified Hoehn and Yahr (mHY), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the FOG-Q is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of FOG in PD patients who are native Turkish speakers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Freezing of gait (FOG) is one of the disabling symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The diagnosis and assessment of FOG may be difficult, but it is absolutely necessary. The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG-Q) and to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the FOG- Q in patients with PD. This study also investigated whether FOG-Q scores changed in subgroups based on severity of PD, fear of falling (FOF), and subtype of PD, and if the reliability of the FOG-Q was affected by these conditions. Methods: Following the translation process, 48 consecutive patients with PD were evaluated using the Turkish version of FOG-Q, the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), modified Hoehn and Yahr (mHY), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST). Results: The mean (SD) and median (q1-q3) FOG-Q scores were 4.44 (5.3) and 2 (0–15). FOG-Q demonstrated positive, stron-gest correlations with FES, TUG, UPDRS total score, and UPDRS part II-III (rs=0.693-0.603), and moderate correlations with FTSST, mHY, and UPDRS part I (rs = 0.579-0.448). BBS negatively correlated with FOG-Q (rs = -0.643). Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.849 and 0.914. The FOG-Q scores increased with disease progression and FOF (p<0.05). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the FOG-Q is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of FOG in PD patients who are native Turkish speakers.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANDAN, S. A., ÇATIKER, A., ÖZCAN, T. Ş. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 44–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/290531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nieuwboer A, Giladi N. Characterizing freezing of gait in Parkin-son’s disease: models of an episodic phenomenon. Mov Disord 2013
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Giladi N, McDermott MP, Fahn S, et al. Freezing of gait in PD: pro-spective assessment in the DATATOP cohort. Neurology 2001
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Tan D, Danoudis M, McGinley J, Morris ME. Relationships be-tween motor aspects of gait impairments and activity limita-tions in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Hely MA, Reid WG, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JG. The Syd-ney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord 2008
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Okuma Y, Yanagisawa N. The clinical spectrum of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008
  6. 23(Suppl 2): S426-430. [CrossRef] 6. Nilsson MH, Hagell P. Freezing of gait questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version. Acta Neurol Scand 2009
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Moore O, Peretz C, Giladi N. Freezing of gait affects quality of life of peoples with Parkinson’s disease beyond its relation-ships with mobility and gait. Mov Disord 2007
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Rosqvist K, Hagell P, Odin P, Ekström H, Iwarsson S, Nilsson MH. Factors associated with life satisfaction in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2017
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Suppa A, Kita A, Leodori G, et al. l-DOPA and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease: Objective Assessment through a Wearable Wireless System. Front Neurol 2017
  10. [CrossRef ] 10. Mancini M, Priest KC, Nutt JG, Horak FB. Quantifying freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease during the instrumented timed up and go test. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012
  11. 49 1201. [CrossRef] 11. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Herman T, et al. Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: agreement between patients with Parkinson’s disease and their carers. Gait Posture 2009
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Giladi N, Shabtai H, Simon ES, Biran S, Tal J, Korczyn AD. Con-struction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2000
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Baggio JA, Curtarelli MB, Rodrigues GR, Tumas V. Validity of the Brazilian version of the freezing of gait questionnaire. Arq Neu-ropsiquiatr 2012
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Tambasco N, Simoni S, Eusebi P, et al. The validation of an Italian version of