Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire‑3: Its Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties

Pages
221–227
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish MIQ‑3 has an excellent reliability and good‑to‑excellent validity in evaluating MI ability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Motor imagery (MI) is the mental representation of a movement without any body movement, and it has been recently used as a therapeutic intervention in rehabilitation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) is the most recent, modified version of the MIQ‑revised, second edition, which is commonly used to measure the imagery ability of patients with movement dysfunction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish MIQ‑3 has an excellent reliability and good‑to‑excellent validity in evaluating MI ability.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Motor imagery (MI) is the mental representation of a movement without any body movement, and it has been recently used as a therapeutic intervention in rehabilitation. The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) is the most recent, modified version of the MIQ‑revised, second edition, which is commonly used to measure the imagery ability of patients with movement dysfunction. The purpose of the study was to translate the MIQ‑3 into Turkish and evaluate its test and retest reliability and validity for the Turkish‑speaking population. Methods: Among 185 healthy participants, 181 completed the procedures. The questionnaire was applied to 86 participants with 1‑week interval to evaluate internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The construct validity of the MIQ-3 was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: The internal consistency of the Turkish MIQ-3 was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.87 for test and 0.86 for retest reliability). The internal consistency of subscales for test–retest reliability (internal visual items, external visual items, and kinesthetic items) was 0.73–0.68, 0.74–0.72, and 0.79–0.73, respectively. Test–retest reliabilities of each item ranged from 0.84 to 0.95. In terms of criterion validity, there was an excellent correlation between subscales and total scale correlations, which ranged from 0.50 to 0.90 (P < 0.001). The validity of the MIQ‑3 was examined with CFA, and the results supported a three-factor model of movement imagery ability. Conclusion: The Turkish MIQ‑3 has an excellent reliability and good‑to‑excellent validity in evaluating MI ability.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLEK, B., AYHAN, K. Ç., BAŞKANI, Y. Y. K. (2020). Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire‑3: Its Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 221–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/290520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ruffino C, Papaxanthis C, Lebon F. Neural plasticity during motor learning with motor imagery practice: Review and perspectives. Neuroscience 2017;341:61-78
  2. Eaves DL, Riach M, Holmes PS, Wright DJ. Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities. Front Neurosci 2016;10:514
  3. Aflalo T, Kellis S, Klaes C, Lee B, Shi Y, Pejsa K, et al. Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science 2015;348:906‑10
  4. Caligiore D, Mustile M, Spalletta G, Baldassarre G. Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and an integrative hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;72:210‑22
  5. Kim T, Frank C, Schack T. A systematic investigation of the effect of action observation training and motor imagery training on the development of mental representation structure and skill performance. Front Hum Neurosci 2017;11:499
  6. Saberi‑Moghadam S, Ferrari‑Toniolo S, Ferraina S, Caminiti R, Battaglia-Mayer A. Modulation of neural variability in premotor, motor, and posterior parietal cortex during change of motor intention. J Neurosci 2016;36:4614-23
  7. La Touche R, Grande‑Alonso M, Cuenca‑Martínez F, Gónzález‑Ferrero L, Suso‑Martí L, Paris‑Alemany A. Diminished kinesthetic and visual motor imagery ability in adults with chronic low back pain. PM R 2019;11:227‑35
  8. Munzert J, Lorey B, Zentgraf K. Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Rev 2009;60:306‑26
  9. Loison B, Moussaddaq AS, Cormier J, Richard I, Ferrapie AL, Ramond A, et al. Translation and validation of the French movement imagery questionnaire – Revised second version (MIQ‑RS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2013;56:157‑73
  10. Frenkel MO, Herzig DS, Gebhard F, Mayer J, Becker C, Einsiedel T. Mental practice maintains range of motion despite forearm immobilization: A pilot study in healthy persons. J Rehabil Med 2014;46:225‑32
  11. McAvinue LP, Robertson IH. Measuring motor imagery ability: A review. J Cogn Psychol 2008;20:232‑51
  12. Warner L, McNeill ME. Mental imagery and its potential for physical therapy. Phys Ther 1988;68:516‑21
  13. Gregg M, Hall C, Butler A. The MIQ‑RS: A suitable option for examining movement imagery ability. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2010;7:249-57
  14. Hall CR, Martin KA. Measuring movement imagery abilities: A revision of the movement imagery questionnaire