Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Analyzing Students’ Conceptions of “Geometric Locus”

Öğrencilerin “Geometrik Yer” Kavrayışlarının Analizi

Pages
186–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the main focus was on the “geometric locus”, we have obtained interesting outcomes related to “graphic”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper we investigate students’ conceptions of “geometric locus” by using the cK¢ model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, we formed 6 groups, each of which consisted of two 10th grade students, who were studying in a big city in the Central Anatolian region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the main focus was on the “geometric locus”, we have obtained interesting outcomes related to “graphic”.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:öğrenci kavrayışları · kBk modeli · geometrik yer

Abstract

In this paper we investigate students’ conceptions of “geometric locus” by using the cK¢ model. For this purpose, we formed 6 groups, each of which consisted of two 10th grade students, who were studying in a big city in the Central Anatolian region. We asked the participants 5 questions related to the “geometric locus” concept. In light of the literature, we firstly revealed the conceptual structure of “geometric locus”. Later, students’ conceptions about this concept have been analyzed by comparing students’ responses to these questions and conceptual structure of “geometric locus” concept. The analyses we have conducted with the data suggest that students’ conceptions were not convenient, moreover; they did not have exact conceptions about the core of concepts and they were not able to correctly explain each situation. Although the main focus was on the “geometric locus”, we have obtained interesting outcomes related to “graphic”.

Özet

Bu araştırmada kBk modelini kullanarak “geometrik yer” kavramı ile ilgili öğrenci kavrayışlarını ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç için İç Anadolu bölgesinde yer alan bir büyükşehirdeki özel dershanede kursa devam eden ve araştırmaya gönüllü olarak katılan 12 tane 10. sınıf öğrencisi ikişerli olarak gruplandırılmış ve öğrencilerden bir çalışma yaprağındaki “geometrik yer” kavramı ile ilgili 5 tane soruyu cevaplamaları istenmiştir. İlk önce bu sorular temel alınarak araştırmacılar tarafından kBk modeli yoluyla “geometrik yer” kavramının kavramsal yapısı ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Daha sonra öğrencilerin bu sorulara verdikleri cevaplar kullanılarak, “geometrik yer” kavramı ile ilgili kavrayışlar analiz edilmiştir. Son olarak bu analizler karşılaştırılmış ve yorumlanmıştır. Yapılan bu karşılaşmada, öğrencilerin sahip olduğu “geometrik yer” ile ilgili kavrayışlarının sezgisel olduğu, öğrencilerin uygun olamayan kavrayışlara sahip oldukları ve bu kavrayışlarını irdelemeksizin kullandıkları sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu araştırmada amaç “geometrik yer” kavramını incelemek olmasına rağmen, “grafik” kavramı ile ilgili ilginç sonuçlar ile de karşılaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞ, G. Y., ARGÜN, Z. (2016). Analyzing Students’ Conceptions of “Geometric Locus”. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 186–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/289901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adams, W. M. (1866). Outlines of geometry; or, the motion of a point. Melborne: BiblioBazaar Atallah, F. (2003). Mathematics through their eyes: Student conceptions of mathematics in everyday life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Canada. Balacheff, N. (2000). A modeling challenge: untangling learners’ knowing, Journées Internationales d’Orsay sur les Sciences Cognitives: L’apprentissage, Paris. http://www-didactique.imag.fr/Balacheff/TextesDivers/JIOSC2000.html.
  2. Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2002). Students conceptions: an introduction to a formal characterization, Cahier du laboratoire Leibniz 65, http://wwwleibniz.imag.fr/LesCahiers/Cahiers2002.html.
  3. Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2003). ‘Baghera assessment project’, In S. Soury-Lavergne (Ed.), Baghera Assessment Project: Designing an Hybrid and Emergent Educational Society. Les Cahiers du Laboratoire Leibniz, 81, Grenoble, Laboratorie Leibniz-IMAG. Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2010). Modeling students’ conceptions: The case of function. Research in collegiate mathematics education, 7, 207–234.
  4. Bishop, A. J. (2002). Critical challenges in researching cultural issues in mathematics education. Journal of Intercultural Studies in Education, 23(2), 119–131.
  5. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawals, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2, 247–285.
  6. Brousseau G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  7. Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2004). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum. Part 1: Rationals as measurements. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 1–20.
  8. Casey, J. (1888). A sequel to the first six books of the elements of Euclid, containing an easy introduction to modern geometry with numerous examples. Dublin: Hodges Figgis. Cha, S., & Noss, R. (2002). Designing to exploit dynamic-geometric intuitions to make sense of functions and graphs, In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 209–216).
  9. Norwich, UK. Chieu,V. M. & Herbst, P. (2011). Designing an intelligent teaching simulator for learning to teach by practicing. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43, 105–117
  10. Clement J., Mokros, J. R., & Schultz, K. (1986). Adolescents’ graphing skills: A descriptive analysis. The Annual Meeting of the American