SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Development of A Learning Responsibility Scale

BAHADIR ERİŞTİ
Pages
481–503
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The scale developed is assessed as a validated and reliable tool that can be used to determine students' fulfillment of inschool and out-of-school behaviors within the scope of their learning responsibility

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:–The purpose of this research is to develop a scale that will enable to determine the conditions of fulfillment of students’ behaviors within the scope of learning responsibility which can be directly related to each course and learning area in school learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants of the study are 520 university students studying at undergraduate level in different faculties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The scale developed is assessed as a validated and reliable tool that can be used to determine students' fulfillment of inschool and out-of-school behaviors within the scope of their learning responsibility
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

–The purpose of this research is to develop a scale that will enable to determine the conditions of fulfillment of students’ behaviors within the scope of learning responsibility which can be directly related to each course and learning area in school learning. Participants of the study are 520 university students studying at undergraduate level in different faculties. Scale development process was developed in nine stages in the direction of literature review, subject field experts and linguists, and finalized after pilot implementation, to the research population. The analysis of the research data was carried out by means of descriptive factor analysis. As the result of the data analysis process, a structure with explanatory power of about 54% of the total variance was obtained which explains the behaviors related to learning responsibility with four factors and 28 items (χ2: 6856,93, df: 351; p <.000). The reliability analysis shows that, the scale has a very high level (α =.927) of reliability. The scale developed is assessed as a validated and reliable tool that can be used to determine students' fulfillment of inschool and out-of-school behaviors within the scope of their learning responsibility

🔖

Cite This Article

ERİŞTİ, B. (2017). Development of A Learning Responsibility Scale. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 481–503. https://ajindex.com/articles/289868

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Boud, D (1988). Introduction to the second edition. In D. Boud (Ed), Developing student autonomy in learning (pp. 7-16). London: Kogan Page. Brooks, M.G. & Brooks, J.G. (1999). The courage to be constructivist. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 18- 24. Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M.G. (2006). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. (Revised Ed). Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Caxton, G.,Atkinson,T., Osborn, M. & Wallace, M. (2013). Liberating the learner: Lessons for professional development in education. New York: Routledge. Champagne, M.F, Clayton, T. Dimmitt, N. Laszewski, M. Savage, W. Shaw, J. Stroupe, R. Myint, M. & Walter, P. (2001). The assessment of learner autonomy and language learning in L, Dam (Ed), Learner Autonomy: New Insights. (pp. 45-55). AILA Review 15. Clarke, J. (1998). Students' perceptions of different tertiary learning environments. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(1), 107-117.
  2. Clayton, J. (2003). Assessing and researching the online learning environment. In M. Khine & D. Fisher (Eds). Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 157- 186). Singapore: World Scientific. Comrey, A.L. & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. (2nd. ed), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  3. Cook-Sather, A. (2009). From traditional accountability to shared responsibility: The benefits and challenges of student consultants gathering midcourse feedback in college classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 231-241.
  4. Cook-Sather, A. (2010). Students as learners and teachers: Taking responsibility, transforming education, and redefining accountability. Curriculum Inquiry, 40, 555–575.
  5. Davis, B. & Sumara, D. (2002). Constructivist discourses and the field of education: Problems and possibilities. Educational Theory, 52(4), 409-428.
  6. DeVellis, R.F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed), Los Angeles: Sage. Devlin, M. (2002). Taking responsibility for learning isn't everything: A case for developing tertiary students' conceptions of learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(2), 125-138.
  7. Diamond, J.B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J.P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98.
  8. Discenza, R., Howard, C. & Schenk, K. (2002). The design & management of effect