Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Skills in Planning of Teaching Focused on Mathematical Thinking in School Practice

Ortaöğretim Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Okul Uygulamalarında Matematiksel Düşünme Odaklı Öğretimi Planlama Becerileri

Pages
292–319
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, it was concluded that the preservice teachers could focus on students' mathematical thinking in their plans made for school practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, which was conducted with 20 preservice teachers participated in the instruction focused on mathematical thinking, it was aimed to determine preservice teachers’ skills in planning of teaching focusing on mathematical thinking in the school practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a part of teaching practice course in which the preservice teachers attended one semester after the instruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, it was concluded that the preservice teachers could focus on students' mathematical thinking in their plans made for school practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:matematik öğretimi · matematiksel düşünme · matematik öğretimini planlama

Abstract

In this study, which was conducted with 20 preservice teachers participated in the instruction focused on mathematical thinking, it was aimed to determine preservice teachers’ skills in planning of teaching focusing on mathematical thinking in the school practice. It is a part of teaching practice course in which the preservice teachers attended one semester after the instruction. In the study, a classroom activity carried out by students, that focuses their attention on a specific mathematical thought was defined as a mathematical task and the preservice teachers were asked to make plans for school practice using mathematical tasks of their choice. The plans made by preservice teachers were analyzed with a scoring rubric for attention to students’ thinking. The rubric is a tool relevant to the theoretical framework of the research. In the analysis, it was observed that the plans made by preservice teachers got high scores in total and according to the dimensions of the rubric which are mathematical goal, anticipating students’ correct and incorrect thinking, asking questions that are assessing and advancing students’ thinking, discussion that is based on students’ thinking and that is making the mathematics clear. Accordingly, it was concluded that the preservice teachers could focus on students' mathematical thinking in their plans made for school practice.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ortaöğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının Öğretmenlik Uygulaması dersi kapsamındaki okul uygulamalarında matematiksel düşünme odaklı öğretimi planlama becerilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma, Matematiksel düşünme odaklı öğretim uygulamasına katılmış olan 20 öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışma kapsamında matematiksel görev, öğrencilerin dikkatini belirli bir matematiksel düşünceye odaklamak amacıyla yapılan sınıf etkinliği olarak tanımlanmış ve öğretmen adaylarından okul uygulamaları için kendilerinin belirledikleri matematiksel görevler çerçevesinde planlar yapmaları istenmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının yapmış oldukları planlar, ders planlama öğeleri rubriği ile analiz edilerek puanlanmıştır. Rubrik araştırmanın dayandığı teorik çerçeveye uygun bir araçtır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, öğretmen adaylarının yapmış oldukları planların ders planlama öğeleri rubriğinde yer alan dersin matematiksel amacını belirleme; öğrencilerin doğru çözümlerini ve hatalı çözümlerini öngörme; öğrenci düşünmesini değerlendirip ilerletecek sorular belirleme; öğrenci düşünmesine dayandırılan ve dersteki matematiksel düşünceleri belirginleştiren tartışma düzenleme şeklindeki öğelere göre ve toplamda yüksek puanlar aldıkları görülmüştür. Buna göre öğretmen adaylarının okul uygulamaları için yapmış oldukları planlarda öğrencilerinin matematiksel düşünmelerine odaklanabildikleri sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, G., AKYÜZ, G. (2016). Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Skills in Planning of Teaching Focused on Mathematical Thinking in School Practice. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 292–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/289857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alkan, H. ve Güzel, E. B. (2005). Öğretmen Adaylarında Matematiksel Düşünmenin Gelişimi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (3), 221–236.
  2. Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics Teaching Cases as a Catalyst for Informed Strategic Inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 81–93.
  3. Boston, M. D. (2006). Developing Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of and Capacity to Implement Instructional Tasks with High Level Cognitive Demands. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, School of Education, Department of Instruction and Learning, Pittsburgh. Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Problem Solving and Problem Posing: an Exploratory Study. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
  4. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P. and Loef, M. (1989). Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499–531.
  5. Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing More Than Right and Wrong Answers: Prospective Teachers’ Interpretations of Students’ Mathematical Work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 155–181.
  6. Duran, N (2005). Matematiksel Düşünme Becerilerine İlişkin Bir Araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  7. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  8. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. B. and Empson, S. B. (1996). A Longitudinal Study of Learning to Use Children’s Thinking in Mathematics Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.
  9. Fernandez, C. and Chokshi, S. (2002). A Practical Guide to Translating Lesson Study for a U.S. Setting. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (2), 128–134.
  10. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J. and Chokshi, S. (2003). A US-Japan Lesson Study Collaboration Reveals Critical Lenses for Examining Practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.
  11. Franke, M. L. and Kazemi, E. (2001). Learning to Teach Mathematics: Focus on Student Thinking. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 102–109.
  12. Henderson, P.B., Baldwin, D., Dasigi, V., Dupras, M., Fritz, S. J., Ginat, D. vd. (2001). Striving for Mathematical Thinking. The 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Working Group Report, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33 (4), 114–124. (30 Mart 2010), blue.butler.edu/~phenders/striving.doc Henderson, P. B., Fritz, S. J., Hamer, J., Hitcher, L., Marion, B., Riedesel, C. and Scharf, C. (2002). Material