Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

A Review on Science Learning Progressions

Fen Öğrenme Progresyonları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Pages
620–648
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is hoped that the study will encourage using learning progressions both in designing professional programs and aligning curriculum, instruction and assessment by looking curricula with a relatively new perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Learning progressions, as one of the evidence-based models, are based on the careful design and testing of hypotheses related to the curriculum, and have recently gained popularity in terms of supporting students’ core scientific concepts and designing instructional materials to increase their literacy in that area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This review study, which is related to learning progression in science education, has been carried out with the aim of increasing the accessible resources in Turkish literature and attracting more researchers and practitioners while the research, development and examination studies on the subject are progressing rapidly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is hoped that the study will encourage using learning progressions both in designing professional programs and aligning curriculum, instruction and assessment by looking curricula with a relatively new perspective.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:öğrenme progresyonları · fen eğitimi · değerlendirme

Abstract

Learning progressions, as one of the evidence-based models, are based on the careful design and testing of hypotheses related to the curriculum, and have recently gained popularity in terms of supporting students’ core scientific concepts and designing instructional materials to increase their literacy in that area. This review study, which is related to learning progression in science education, has been carried out with the aim of increasing the accessible resources in Turkish literature and attracting more researchers and practitioners while the research, development and examination studies on the subject are progressing rapidly. In this context, this review study includes (a) the definition, general features and potential uses of learning progressions, (b) development, validity and revision of learning progressions, (c) the relationship between learning progressions and assessment and (d) names of previously developed science learning progressions. It is hoped that the study will encourage using learning progressions both in designing professional programs and aligning curriculum, instruction and assessment by looking curricula with a relatively new perspective.

Özet

Öğrenme progresyonları öğretim programı ile ilgili hipotezlerin dikkatli bir şekilde tasarlanmasına ve test edilmesine dayanan kanıt temelli modellerden biridir ve son yıllarda öğrencilerin merkezi bilimsel kavramları anlamasını destekleme ve o alandaki okuryazarlıklarını artıracak öğretim materyallerini tasarlama anlamında popülerlik kazanmaktadır. Fen eğitiminde öğrenme progresyonları ile ilgili olan bu inceleme çalışması konuyla ilgili araştırma, geliştirme ve inceleme çalışmaları hızla ilerlerken Türkçe alanyazındaki erişilebilir kaynakları artırmak ve daha fazla araştırmacı ve uygulayıcının dikkatini çekmek gereksinimlerinden yola çıkılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada konuyla ilgili yapılmış çalışmalar incelenerek (a) öğrenme progresyonlarının tanımı, genel özellikleri, potansiyel kullanım alanları, (b) öğrenme progresyonlarının geliştirilmesi, geçerliliği ve revizyonu ve (c) öğrenme progresyonlarının değerlendirmeler ile ilişkisine yer verilmektedir. Çalışmanın hem profesyonel programların tasarlanmasında hem de öğretim programlarına yeni bir bakış açısı ile bakılarak öğretim materyallerinin ve değerlendirmelerin programla daha uyumlu hale getirilmesinde öğrenme progresyonlarını incelemeye ve kullanmaya teşvik etmesi umulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, N. R., ÖZGÜR, S. (2018). A Review on Science Learning Progressions. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 620–648. https://ajindex.com/articles/289818

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alonzo, A. C. & Gotwals, A. W. (Eds.). (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. Alonzo, A. C. & Steedle, J. T. (2008). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389–421.
  2. Alonzo, A. C. (2010). Considerations in using learning progressions to inform achievement level descriptions. Measurement, 8, 201-208.
  3. Alonzo, A. C. (2011). Learning progressions that support formative assessment practices. Measurement, 9, 124–129.
  4. Alonzo, A. C., Neidorf, T. & Anderson, C. W. (2012). Using learning progressions to inform large-scale assessment. (In A. C. Alonzo and A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 211–240.
  5. Baerends, G. P. (1988).
  6. Ethology. In R.C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, &R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 765-830). New York: Wiley. Battista, M. T. (2011). Conceptualizations and issues related to learning progressions, learning trajectories, and levels of sophistication. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8 (3): 507–570.
  7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1),7–74.
  8. Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, S., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11, 33-63.
  9. Briggs, D., Diaz-Bilello, E., Peck, F., Alzen, J., Chattergoon, R., & Johnson, R. (2015, April). Using a learning progression framework to assess and evaluate student growth. Boulder, CO: Center for Assessment Design Research and Evaluation. Catley, K., Lehrer, R. & Reiser, B. (2005). Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. Paper Commissioned by the National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement, Washington, DCNational Academies. Choi, Y. (2012). Dynamic Bayesian Inference Networks and Hidden Markov Models For Modeling Learning Progressions Over Multiple Time Points, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, MD. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
  10. Confrey, J. & Maloney, A. P. (2015). A design research study of a curriculum and diagnostic assessment system for a learning trajectory on equipartitioning. ZDM-The Intern