Journals / Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Peer editing as a way of developing ELT students’ writing skills: An action research

Pages
1226–1235
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, peer editing in writing classes affects foreign language learners positively, and peer editing can be used in writing classes as an alternative way of developing ELT students’ writing skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Inspired from problematic nature of writing, this study adopted an action research through peer editing as a way of developing writing skills of students at an ELT department.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was designed through the specific stages of an action research which are planning, action, observation and reflection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, peer editing in writing classes affects foreign language learners positively, and peer editing can be used in writing classes as an alternative way of developing ELT students’ writing skills.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler peer editing · action research · writing skill

Özet

Öz Inspired from problematic nature of writing, this study adopted an action research through peer editing as a way of developing writing skills of students at an ELT department. This study was designed through the specific stages of an action research which are planning, action, observation and reflection. In planning and action stages, the researchers designed general and specific criteria to follow during the cycles, and they applied these criteria accordingly. In observation stage, the peer editing processes in specific cycles were observed. The researchers used cycles at this stage. These cycles were application processes which were followed step by step during peer editing. In reflection stage, reflections of the participants on peer editing in writing classes were gathered through a form. Qualitative data collected from participants were analyzed and reported descriptively at the end. The reflections were categorized as before and after writing classes, advantages and disadvantages of peer editing. In conclusion, peer editing in writing classes affects foreign language learners positively, and peer editing can be used in writing classes as an alternative way of developing ELT students’ writing skills.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, E., ATAÇ, B. A. (2019). Peer editing as a way of developing ELT students’ writing skills: An action research. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 1226–1235. https://ajindex.com/articles/28967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al-Nafiseh, K. I. (2013). Collaborative writing and peer-editing in EFL writing classes. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 4(2), 236-245.
  2. Amores, M. J. (1997). A new perspective on peer-editing. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 513-522.
  3. Bailey, K. M. (2001). Action research, teacher research, and classroom research in language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Eds). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.489- 498). London: Thomson Learning. Behjat, F., & Yamini, M. ( 2012). Self- vs. peer-editing: one step forward from assessment to building EFL students’ writing skill. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 1(1), 65-85.
  4. Burns, A. (2005). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Eds). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 241-256). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. NY: Routledge. Byrd, D. R. (2003). Practical tips for implementing peer editing tasks in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 435-441.
  5. Diab, N. M. (2010). Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System 38, 85–95.
  6. Ekmekci, E. (2017). The flipped writing classroom in Turkish EFL context: A comparative study on a new model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 18(2), 151-167.
  7. Finch, A. (2014). Participant perceptions of peer editing in an EFL freshman English program. Studies in British and American Language and Literature, 113(6), 299-326.
  8. Garofalo, R. (2013). How the implementation of peer-editing checklists impacts the peer revision process in EFL writing classes. RitsIILCS, 24 (2), 143-159.
  9. Göy, N. (2017). An action research on the development of self-regulated writing strategies of Turkish EFL students. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 191–204.
  10. Harutyunyan, L., & Poveda, M. F. (2018). Students’ perception of peer review in an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 138-151.
  11. Hemati, M. (2012). The effect of teacher, peer, and self-editing on improving grammatical accuracy in EFL learners’ writing. Diversité et Identité Culturelle en Europe, Retrieved June 20, 2019 from http://www.diacronia.ro/ro/indexing/details/A4026/pdf
  12. Hengwichitkul, L. (2006). An analysis of errors in English abstracts translated by Thai university graduate students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Srinakharinwirot Uni