Journals / Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL learners’ collocation learning

Pages
489–509
Publication Date
2020-03-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it was concluded that using mobile applications was an effective way of improving vocabulary knowledge receptively for only short-term memory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The aim of this study was to identify the effectiveness of a mobile application in vocabulary knowledge improvement of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study adopted a quasi-experimental research design consisting of an experimental and a control group with 73 participants studying at two state universities in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it was concluded that using mobile applications was an effective way of improving vocabulary knowledge receptively for only short-term memory.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler collocations · mobile-assisted language learning (MALL)

Özet

Öz The aim of this study was to identify the effectiveness of a mobile application in vocabulary knowledge improvement of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. This study adopted a quasi-experimental research design consisting of an experimental and a control group with 73 participants studying at two state universities in Turkey. During the application that lasted for 14 weeks, the experimental group tried to learn 40 collocations via CollocatApp, while control group used worksheets. The data were gathered through Collocation Achievement Test (CAT) developed by the researchers and Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS) (Wesche & Paribakht, 1996). CAT was used for measuring receptive vocabulary knowledge of learners, and VKS was used for testing productive vocabulary knowledge. The findings showed that there was a significant difference between the experimental group and control group in terms of receptive vocabulary knowledge in the post-test. However, there was no difference between groups in retention tests. At the dimension of productive vocabulary knowledge, it was seen that there was no difference between the use of mobile applications and worksheets in terms of productive vocabulary knowledge. Thus, it was concluded that using mobile applications was an effective way of improving vocabulary knowledge receptively for only short-term memory.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞDELER, K. O., KONCA, M. Y., DEMİRÖZ, H. (2020). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL learners’ collocation learning. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 489–509. https://ajindex.com/articles/28965

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ağca, R. K., & Özdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 781–785. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.147 Alemi, M., Sarab, M., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6), 99–109. Doi: 10.5539/ies.v5n6p99 Azar, A. S., & Nasiri, H. (2014). Learners’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in L2 listening comprehension. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1836-1843.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.613 Bárcena, E. et al. (2015). State of the art of language learning design using mobile technology: sample apps and some critical reflection. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds), Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, (pp. 36-43). Dublin: Researchpublishing.net. doi: 10.14705/rpnet.2015.000307 Başoğlu, E., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1–7. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898010
  2. Bornstein, A. (n.d.). Memorizing vocabulary and languages. VideoJug, Retrieved from http://www.videojug.com/interview/memorizing-vocabulary-and-languages
  3. Bruton, A. (2009). The Vocabulary Knowledge Scale: A critical analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6, 288-297. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15434300902801909?journalCode=hlaq20
  4. Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645.doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011 Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1),37-46.doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104 Çavuş, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91.doi:10.1111/j.14678535.2007.00801.x Deng, H., & Shao, Y. (2011). Self-directed English vocabulary learning with a mobile application in everyday context. 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning: mLearn 2011
  5. Conference Proceedings, China, 24-31.
  6. Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A. D., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K. A., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (200