Journals / Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINE TYPE 2 DIABETES DEVELOPMENT RISK IN ADULT PATIENTS PRESENTING TO FAMILY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF GAZIOSMANPAŞA TAKSIM TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL USING DIABETES RISK ASSESSMENT TEST

GAZİOSMANPAŞA TAKSİM EĞİTİM ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ POLİKLİNİĞİNE BAŞVURAN ERİŞKİN BİREYLERDE RİSK DEĞERLENDİRME SKORLAMA SİSTEMİ KULLANILARAK TİP 2 DİYABET RİSKİNİN TARANMASI

Pages
53–60
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Utilization of ADA type 2 diabetes risk score should be a routine practice in healthcare facilities in Turkey to identify and follow-up high-risk individuals, and studies aimed at prevention of diabetes should be conducted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to determine type 2 diabetes development risk in adult patients presenting to Family Medicine Department of Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Hospital using ADA (American Diabetes Association) diabetes risk assessment test, to identify factors associated with high risk, and to evaluate whether ADA type 2 diabetes risk assessment test is applicable.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study was conducted between March 2017 - September 2017 with 3131 patients aged above 18 years, who were not pregnant, with the purpose of assessment of type 2 diabetes risk.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Utilization of ADA type 2 diabetes risk score should be a routine practice in healthcare facilities in Turkey to identify and follow-up high-risk individuals, and studies aimed at prevention of diabetes should be conducted.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to determine type 2 diabetes development risk in adult patients presenting to Family Medicine Department of Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Hospital using ADA (American Diabetes Association) diabetes risk assessment test, to identify factors associated with high risk, and to evaluate whether ADA type 2 diabetes risk assessment test is applicable. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted between March 2017 - September 2017 with 3131 patients aged above 18 years, who were not pregnant, with the purpose of assessment of type 2 diabetes risk. In order to determine type 2 diabetes risk and measurement of anthropometric parameters, individuals height, weight and waist circumference were determined and ADA type 2 Diabetes Risk Test Survey was used to determine the risk of type 2 diabetes. Analysis of numerical data was made with calculation of mean and standard deviation, frequency and proportion values, whereas categorical data was analysed with chi-square test. Results: The rate of participants with a high risk of type 2 diabetes was 32%. According to analysis results, advanced age, obesity, history of gestational diabetes, presence of diabetes in the first degree relatives, presence of hypertension, physical inactivity and presence of chronic illness were determined as independent factors associated with increased the risk of type 2 diabetes. Conclusion: ADA type 2 diabetes risk score is an appropriate and convenient scoring system to determine the risk of diabetes. Utilization of ADA type 2 diabetes risk score should be a routine practice in healthcare facilities in Turkey to identify and follow-up high-risk individuals, and studies aimed at prevention of diabetes should be conducted.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ADA (Amerikan Diyabet Birliği) diyabet risk belirleme anketi kullanarak Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi Aile Hekimliğine başvuran erişkin hastalarda tip 2 diyabet gelişme riskinin belirlenmesi, yüksek riskle ilişkili etmenlerin belirlenmesi ve ADA tip 2 diyabet risk belirme testinin uygulanabilir olduğununun değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmaya Mart 2017 – Eylül 2017 tarihlerinde diyabet tanısı almamış, gebe olmayan 18 yaş üstü 3131 hasta katılmıştır. Çalışma verileri katılımcılarla yüz yüze uygulanan anketler ve ölçümlerle elde edilmiştir. Tip 2 diyabet riskinin belirlenmesi için ADA tip 2 Diyabet Risk Test Anketi kullanılmıştır. Sayısal verileri içeren soruların analizinde ortalama ve standart sapma, frekans ve oran değerleri, nitel verilerin analizinde ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmada katılımcılardan tip 2 diyabet riski yüksek olanların oranı %32 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmada yapılan analizlerde ileri yaş, obezite, gestasyonel diyabet varlığı, birinci derece yakınlarında diyabet varlığı, hipertansiyon varlığı, fiziksel inaktivite ve kronik hastalığa sahip olma durumunun tek başına tip 2 diyabet riskini arttırdığı belirlenmiştir. Diyabet riski yüksek olan kadın ve erkek bireylerin düşük olanlara göre eğitim düzeyi ve gelir düzeyi daha düşük saptanmıştır. Sonuç: ADA tip 2 diyabet risk skoru diyabet riskini belirlemek için kullanılması uygun ve kolay uygulanabilir bir skorlamadır. Türkiye’de sağlık kuruluşlarında ADA tip 2 diyabet risk skorunun kullanılması, riskli bireylerin saptanması ve izlenmesi sağlanmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

İĞCİ, M. A., BASAT, O. (2019). DETERMINE TYPE 2 DIABETES DEVELOPMENT RISK IN ADULT PATIENTS PRESENTING TO FAMILY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF GAZIOSMANPAŞA TAKSIM TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL USING DIABETES RISK ASSESSMENT TEST. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 53–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/289001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018: Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018
  2. s1-s2 2. International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Diabetes Atlas 7th Edition, 2015
  3. s11-s30 Erişim: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/ 3. Marshall S.M, Flyvbjerg A. Prevention and Early Detection of Vascular Complications of Diabetes.British Medical Journal. 2006
  4. International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Diabetes Atlas 7th Edition, 2015
  5. Erişim: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/ 5. Smith C.A.S., Barnett E. Diabetes-Related Mortality Among Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, And Cuban Americans İn The United States. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health, 2005:18
  6. TURDEP-II Study Group. Diabetes epidemic in Turkey: results of the second population-based survey of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey (TURDEP-II). Diabetologia 2011
  7. 140 7. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018: Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018
  8. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Balkau B, Colagiuri S, Zimmet PZ, Tonkin AM, et al. AUSDRISK: an Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool based on demographic, 9. Doğan B, Yörük N, Öner C, Yavuz G, Oğuz A. Üniversite öğrenci ve çalışanlarının diyabet riski ve beslenme alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Türk Aile Hek Derg. 2017
  9. 21(2):50-5. 10. Alghadir A, Alghwiri AA
  10. Awad H, Anwer S.Ten year diabetes risk forecast in the capital of Jordan: Arab diabetes risk assessment questionnaire perspective – a strobe-complaint article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016
  11. 95(12):3181. 11. Yan F, Cha E, Lee ET, Mayberry RM, Wang W, Umpierrez G. A self-assessment tool for screening young adults at risk of type 2 diabetes using Strong Heart Family Study data Diabetes Educ. 2016
  12. 42(5):607-17 12. Özsoy S, YDÜ Hastanesinde Çalışan Hemşirelerde Tip 2 Diyabet Riskinin Taranması ve Beslenme Alışkanlıklarının Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Çalışma, Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Tıbbi Beslenme Tedavisi Programı Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Lefkoşa. 2015. 13. Makrilakis K, Liatis S, Grammatikou S, Perrea D, Stathi C, Tsiligros P, et al. Validation of the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) questionnaire for screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, dysglycaemia and the metabolic syndrome in Greece. Diabetes Metab. 2011
  13. 37(2):144-51. 14. Etbaş (Demirağ) H. Tip-2 Diabetes Mellituslu Hastalarin Birinci Derece Yakinlarinda Diyab