Journals / Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Current Approaches to Three-Dimensional Cell Culture System

ÜÇ BOYUTLU HÜCRE KÜLTÜRÜ SİSTEMLERİNE GÜNCEL YAKLAŞIMLAR

Pages
84–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review was to discuss the application areas of existing 3D cultures in comparison with 2D cultures and 3D cultures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Two-dimensional (2D) cell culture is a valuable method for cell-based research, However, it may provide unpredictable, misleading data on in vivo responses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Over the last two decades, awareness of the importance of the cellular microenvironment (e.g. extracellular matrix and interstitial fluid) has increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review was to discuss the application areas of existing 3D cultures in comparison with 2D cultures and 3D cultures.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) cell culture is a valuable method for cell-based research, However, it may provide unpredictable, misleading data on in vivo responses. Over the last two decades, awareness of the importance of the cellular microenvironment (e.g. extracellular matrix and interstitial fluid) has increased. This new cell culture paradigm, called as 3D cell culture, is rapidly gaining popularity. With the transition from 2D cultures to 3D culture techniques, it is provided the reveal of models that are more similar to living tissues physiologically. 3D cell cultures offer different techniques for different purposes, and users need to choose the most available model according to the requirement. 3D cell culture systems have been used to clarify the complex physiological mechanisms in the fields of stem cell studies, drug discoveries, cancer research, gene and protein expression studies. The aim of this review was to discuss the application areas of existing 3D cultures in comparison with 2D cultures and 3D cultures.

Özet

İki boyutlu (2B) hücre kültürü, hücre temelli araştırmalar için değerli bir yöntemdir ancak in vivo yanıtlar hakkında öngörülemeyen, yanıltıcı veriler sağlayabilir. Son yirmi yılda, hücresel mikro çevrenin (örneğin hücre dışı matris ve interstisyel sıvı) önemine farkındalık artmıştır. Dolayısıyla, 3B hücre kültürü olarak adlandırılan bu yeni hücre kültürü paradigması hızla popülerlik kazanmaktadır. 2B kültürlerden 3B kültür tekniklerine geçiş ile birlikte fizyolojik olarak canlılardaki dokulara daha benzer olan modellerin ortaya çıkarılması sağlanmaktadır. 3B hücre kültürleri farklı amaçlar için faklı teknikler sunar ve gereksinime göre kullanıcıların en uygun modeli seçmeleri gerekir. 3B hücre kültürü sistemlerinin, kök hücre çalışmaları, ilaç keşifleri, kanser araştırmaları, gen ve protein ekspresyon çalışmalarının da içerisinde olduğu birçok karmaşık fizyolojik mekanizmanın aydınlatılmasında yaygınca kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı 2B kültürler ile 3B kültürleri karşılaştırarak mevcut 3B kültürlerin uygulama alanlarını tartışmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOPCAN, E. P. (2020). Current Approaches to Three-Dimensional Cell Culture System. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 84–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/288990

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ravi M, Paramesh V, Kaviya S, Anuradha E, Solomon FP. 3D cell culture systems: advantages and applications. Journal of cellular physiology. 2015;230(1):16-26. 2. Knight E, Przyborski S. Advances in 3D cell culture technologies enabling tissue‐like structures to be created in vitro. Journal of anatomy. 2015;227(6):746-756. 3. Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends in cell biology. 2011;21(12):745-754. 4. Duval K, Grover H, Han L-H, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J, et al. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology. 2017;32(4):266-277. 5. Burdick JA, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2008;15(2):205-219. 6. Freshney R. Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique: Wiley-Liss; 2005. 7. Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Threedimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay and drug development technologies. 2014;12(4):207-218. 8. Choi SW, Yeh YC, Zhang Y, Sung HW, Xia Y. Uniform beads with controllable pore sizes for biomedical applications. Small. 2010;6(14):1492-1498. 9. Vinci M, Gowan S, Boxall F, Patterson L, Zimmermann M, Lomas C, et al. Advances in establishment and analysis of three-dimensional tumor spheroid-based functional assays for target validation and drug evaluation. BMC biology. 2012;10(1):29. 10. Weaver VM, Petersen OW, Wang F, Larabell C, Briand P, Damsky C, et al. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. The Journal of cell biology. 1997;137(1):231-245. 11. Lin CQ, Bissell MJ. Multi-faceted regulation of cell differentiation by extracellular matrix. The FASEB Journal. 1993;7(9):737-743. 12. Bonnier F, Keating M, Wrobel TP, Majzner K, Baranska M, Garcia-Munoz A, et al. Cell viability assessment using the Alamar blue assay: a comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models. Toxicology in vitro. 2015;29(1):124-131. 13. Chitcholtan K, Asselin E, Parent S, Sykes PH, Evans JJ. Differences in growth properties of endometrial cancer in three dimensional (3D) culture and 2D cell monolayer. Experimental cell research. 2013;319(1):75-87. 14. Mabry KM, Payne SZ, Anseth KS. Microarray analyses to quantify advantages of 2D and 3D hydrogel culture systems in maintaining the native valvular interstitial cell phenotype. Biomaterials. 2016;74:31-41. 15.