Journals / Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Sustainable approaches in archaeological site management:Management planning studies on aspat (strobilos)

Arkeolojik alan yönetiminde sürdürülebilir yaklaşımlar: Aspat (strobilos) yönetim planı çalışmaları

Pages
189–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussions conclude with evaluations on necessity for comprehensive management approaches that will integrate values and potentials of archaeological values with sustainable development principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many examples of archaeological sites possess resemblances between ancient and traditional cultures regarding tangible and intangible features in means of adaptation to their environment, building skills, economical production systems, cultural motives and belief systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Generation of ‘sustainable development’ paradigms for the past few decades caused significant changes in conventional management approaches for cultural heritage sites including archaeological areas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussions conclude with evaluations on necessity for comprehensive management approaches that will integrate values and potentials of archaeological values with sustainable development principles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Many examples of archaeological sites possess resemblances between ancient and traditional cultures regarding tangible and intangible features in means of adaptation to their environment, building skills, economical production systems, cultural motives and belief systems. In addition to their tangible values, they reflect information values regarding local knowledge and skills for enhancement of natural resources or traditional production systems. Generation of ‘sustainable development’ paradigms for the past few decades caused significant changes in conventional management approaches for cultural heritage sites including archaeological areas. Archaeological site management policies are expected to consider environmental impacts, social integration and participation of local communities having cultural and economic bonds with that site, and development of an appropriate economic plan to achieve its sustainability during decision-making process. Hence, purpose of this paper is to evaluate relationships between sustainable development principles and archaeological management strategies in Turkey. Significance of sustainability paradigms and need for new approaches in relation with archaeological sites is discussed. For this purpose, results of the case-study research project entitled as “Archaeological Park Management and Agro- Tourism Planning in Ancient Agricultural Lands of Aspat (Strobilos) and Its Territorium” is evaluated. Aspat Project includes multidisciplinary researches in order to explore natural, cultural, anthropological, social values of project site; threats and problems of the area and prepare a sustainable management program and future strategies for the heritage site. The paper focuses on assessment of the outcomes of management studies in means of sustainable development principles. Comparative analysis to assess impacts of management studies on natural and cultural environment, social structure and economical resources are conducted by using SWOT analysis method. Discussions conclude with evaluations on necessity for comprehensive management approaches that will integrate values and potentials of archaeological values with sustainable development principles.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAYCI, N. (2014). Sustainable approaches in archaeological site management:Management planning studies on aspat (strobilos). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 189–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/288191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AYHAN, H., GÜNER, E. (2010) Proje Alanın Mevcut Yasa ve Yönetmelikler Çerçevesinde Araştırma ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Değerlendirilmesi, Aspat (Strobilos) ve Territoriumunda Arkeolojik Park Yönetimi ve Antik Tarım Teraslarında Agro-Turizm Planlaması Proje Raporu, Tübitak Proje No:107K234; 764-70.
  2. BOCCARDI, G. (2006) World Heritage: The Challenge of Sustainability, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Nara, Japan. BOCCARDI, G. (2007)
  3. World Heritage and Sustainability, Concern for social, economic and envrionmental aspects within the policies and processes of World Heritage Convention, University College London. BOCCARDI, G., DUVELLE, C., (2013) Introducing Cultural Heritage into Sustainable Development Agenda, UNESCO, Sessions 3A, 3A-a. CAN. Z. ŞEN, F. (2010) Doğa Yönetimi ve Tarım Parkı Araştırmaları, Aspat (Strobilos) ve Territoriumunda Arkeolojik Park Yönetimi ve Antik Tarım Teraslarında Agro-Turizm Planlaması Proje Raporu, Tübitak Proje No:107K234; 496-512.
  4. DISKO, S. (2010) World Heritage Sites in Indigenous People’s Territories:Ways of Ensuring Respect for Indigenous Cultures, Values and Human Rights, World Heritage and Cultural Diversity, ed. D., Offenhauber vd; 167-77.
  5. DİLER, A. (2010a) Aspat (Strobilos) ve Territoriumunda Arkeolojik Park Yönetimi ve Antik Tarım Teraslarında Agro-Turizm Planlaması Proje Raporu, Tübitak Proje No:107K234, Muğla Üniversitesi.
  6. DİLER, A. (2010b) Olive Oil and Wine Production of the Halikarnassos Peninsula in Karia, Antik Çağda Anadolu’da Zeytinyağı ve Şarap Üretimi Sempozyum Bildirileri (06-08 Kasım 2008), eds. Ü., Aydınoğlu, Ü., A.K., Şenol, KAAM Kilikia Arkeolojisini Araştırma Merkezi; 135-74.
  7. DİLER, A. (2012a) The Message and the Role of Cultural Heritage:Common Heritage or Common Disaster, Eurolog Symposium in Tunis. DİLER, A. (2012b) Aspat (Strobilos) Territoriumunda Eski Çağda Arazi Kullanımı, Stratonikeia’dan Lagina’ya Ahmet Adil Tırpan Armağanı, Ayrıbasım; 155-74.
  8. DİLER, A. v.d. (2010) Arkeoloji ve Sanat Tarihi Araştırmaları, Aspat (Strobilos) ve Territoriumunda Arkeolojik Park Yönetimi ve Antik Tarım Teraslarında Agro-Turizm Planlaması Proje Raporu, Tübitak Proje No 107K234, Muğla Üniversitesi; 98-336.
  9. HAWKES, J., (2001)
  10. The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability, Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning, for the Cultural Development of Network Victoria (Vic). ICOMOS, (2011) The Paris Declaration on Heritage as a Driver of Development, Paris. JOKILEHTO, J., (2005) A History of Architectural Conservation, The Contribution of En