SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Candida Tu rlerinin Flukonazol, Vorikonazol, Amfoterisin B'ye Karşı Duyarlılıklarının Disk Difu zyon ve Mikrodilu syon Yo ntemiyle Araştırılması

The Investigation of the Susceptibility of Candida Species to Fluconazole, Voriconazole, and Amphotericin B by Disc Diffusion and the Microdilution Method

Hafize SAV
Ayse BARİS
Deniz TURAN
Fatma OZAKKAS
Rabiye ALTINBAS
Sümeyye SEN
Nuri KİRAZ
Pages
444–449
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ek olarak disk difüzyon yöntemi VORI için alternatif antifungal duyarlılık yöntemi olarak değerlendirilebilir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışmada hastanemizde izole edilen Candida türlerinin iki farklı yöntemle antifungal duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hastanemizde çeşitli departmanlardan gelen klinik örneklerden toplam 200 Candida türü izole edildi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ek olarak disk difüzyon yöntemi VORI için alternatif antifungal duyarlılık yöntemi olarak değerlendirilebilir.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bu çalışmada hastanemizde izole edilen Candida türlerinin iki farklı yöntemle antifungal duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Hastanemizde çeşitli departmanlardan gelen klinik örneklerden toplam 200 Candida türü izole edildi. Bu türler geleneksel yöntem (germ tüp oluşturma, corn-meal tween 80 besiyerinde mikroskobik görünüm) ve ticari kit API 20C (Biomerieux, France) ile tanımlandı. Bu türlerin flukonazol (FLU), vorikonazol (VORI), amfoterisin B (AMB) antifungal minimum inhibisyon konsantrasyonu (MIK) değerleri Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute sıvı mikrodilüsyon ve disk-difüzyon (DD) yöntemine göre değerlendirildi. İzole edilen 200 Candida türü; 100 C. albicans, 25 C. glabrata, 7 C. krusei, 43 C. parapsilosis ve 25 C. tropicalis olarak tanımlandı. Bütün Candida izolatları VORI ‘ye karşı duyarlı bulundu. Yüksek direnç (%22,5) oranı referans mikrodilüsyon yöntemi ile AMB antifungaline karşı tespit edilidi. İki yöntem arasında en iyi kategorik oran sırası ile VORI (%99), FLU (%84,9) ve AMB (%72,5) olarak hesaplandı. Vorikonazol, flukonazole dirençli izolatlarda bile in vitro olarak flukonazolden daha iyi aktivite göstermiştir. Ek olarak disk difüzyon yöntemi VORI için alternatif antifungal duyarlılık yöntemi olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Özet

In this study, we aimed to investigate the antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida isolates obtained in our hospital with two methods. A total of 200 Candida isolates were obtained from samples of patients in various departments of our hospital. Identification of each strain was performed using conventional (germ tube formation, microscopic morphology in corn meal-Tween 80 agar), and commercial kit API 20C (Biomerieux, France). MIC values of fluconazole (FLU), voriconazole (VORI), and amphotericin B (AMB) were evaluated according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and disk diffusion (DD) method. Totally isolated 200 Candida species were identified as 100 C. albicans, 25 C. glabrata, 7 C. krusei, 43 C. parapsilosis, and 25 C. tropicalis. All isolates were susceptible to VORI. High resistance rate (22,5%) was detected for AMB antifungal by reference microdilution method. Between two methods, the best categorical ratio was calculated as VORI (99%), FLU (84.9%), and AMB (72,5%) respectively. Voriconazole exhibited better activity in vitro than fluconazole, even in isolates fluconazole resistant and disk diffusion method can be considered as alternative antifungal sensitivity method for VORI.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAV, H., BARİS, A., TURAN, D., OZAKKAS, F., ALTINBAS, R., SEN, S., KİRAZ, N. (2020). Candida Tu rlerinin Flukonazol, Vorikonazol, Amfoterisin B'ye Karşı Duyarlılıklarının Disk Difu zyon ve Mikrodilu syon Yo ntemiyle Araştırılması. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 444–449. https://ajindex.com/articles/287927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Quindós G. Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2014
  2. 8 2. Eschenauer GA, Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ. Is Fluconazole or an Echinocandin the Agent of Choice for Candidemia. Ann Pharmacother. 2015
  3. Furlaneto MC, Rota JF, Quesada RM, et al. Species distribution and in vitro fluconazole susceptibility of clinical Candida isolates in a Brazilian tertiary-care hospital over a 3-year period. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011
  4. Perea S, Patterson TF. Antifungal resistance in pathogenic fungi. Clin Infect Dis. 2002
  5. Malani AN, Kerr LE, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: How to Use This Antifungal Agent and What to Expect. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015
  6. Hamill RJ. Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity. Drugs. 2013
  7. 34 7. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2008. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeast
  8. Approved StandardThird Edition. CLSI document M27-A3. 8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for antifungal disc diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts. In Approved Guideline. (M44-A2), 2nd ed.
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2009 9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. 4th informational supplement, CLSI M27-S4. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012. 10. Kiraz N, Dag I, Oz Y, Yamac M, Kiremitci A, Kasifoglu N, et al. Correlation between broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of caspofungin, voriconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole and fluconazole against Candida glabrata. J Microbiol Methods.2010
  10. Arendrup M, Lundgren B, Jensen IM, Hansen BS, Frimodt-Møller N, et al. Comparison of Etest and a tablet diffusion test with the NCCLS broth microdilution method for fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001
  11. 521–6. 11. Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Boyken LB, Tendolkar S, Kroeger J, et al. Evaluation of Etest and disk diffusion methods compared with broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida spp. against posaconazole, J Clin Microbiol. 2007
  12. Azevedo AC, Bizerra FC, da Matta DA, de Almeida LP, Rosas R, Colombo AL, et al. In vit