Journals / Osmanlı Araştırmaları / 2016 / Sayı: 47

İdris-i Bidlîsî's Letters to Bayezid II and Selim I

İdris-i Bidlîsî'nin II. Bayezid ve I. Selim'e Mektupları

Pages
147–208
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Those dispatched to Selim also carry valuable details in comparison to Selim Şâh-nâme - our unique source regarding the reign of Selim - and thus demonstrate the importance of the texts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article focuses on important unpublished correspondence (cited, however, in a number of publications) of İdris-i Bidlîsî dispatched to Ottoman sultans Bayezid II and Selim I.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article, rather than providing an in-depth analysis of the letters, concentrates on providing English-language translations and thus making this unique information available to a wider audience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Those dispatched to Selim also carry valuable details in comparison to Selim Şâh-nâme - our unique source regarding the reign of Selim - and thus demonstrate the importance of the texts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article focuses on important unpublished correspondence (cited, however, in a number of publications) of İdris-i Bidlîsî dispatched to Ottoman sultans Bayezid II and Selim I. Two letters were addressed to Bayezid II and the remainder to Selim I. While the correspondence sent to Bayezid was personal in nature, those dispatched to Selim exhibit similar qualities to correspondence regarding the activities of Kurdish chieftains sent to Selim by Bıyıklı Mehmed Paşa, Şâdî Paşa and Şeref Han Bidlîsî. This article, rather than providing an in-depth analysis of the letters, concentrates on providing English-language translations and thus making this unique information available to a wider audience. Considering the scarcity of available resources relating to Bidlîsî, it can be seen that the first two letters dispatched to Bayezid II comprise important information about the life of Bidlîsî not available anywhere else. Those dispatched to Selim also carry valuable details in comparison to Selim Şâh-nâme - our unique source regarding the reign of Selim - and thus demonstrate the importance of the texts.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, V. (2016). İdris-i Bidlîsî's Letters to Bayezid II and Selim I. Osmanlı Araştırmaları, Sayı: 47, 147–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/287465

References (10)

  1. Yazma Eserler ve Arşiv Belgeleri Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA.) A.DVN. 42/32, h. 1075. İdris-i Bidlîsî, Mecmû'a-i Münşeat, İÜ. Nadir Eserler Ktp. F 906. İdris-i Bidlîsî, Selim Şâh-nâme, AE. Frs. 810. Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Arşivi (TSMA.) nr. E. 1019. TSMA. nr. E. 3156. TSMA. nr. E. 5675. TSMA. nr. E. 5858. TSMA. nr. E. 6610. TSMA. nr. E. 8333/1. TSMA. nr. E. 8333/2. TSMA. nr. E. 8333/3. Yayımlanmış Eserler Bacque-Grammont, Jean-Louis: Les Ottomans, les Safavides et leurs voisins, İstanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut 1987.
  2. Bacque-Grammont, Jean-Louis-Adle, Chahryar: "Quatre lettres de Seref Beg de Bitlîs (1516-1520) Études turco-safavides, xi", Der Islam, 63/1 (Berlin 1986), s.90-118.
  3. Barkan, Ömer Lutfi: "H. 933-934 (M. 1527-1528) Malî Yılına Âit Bütçe Cetveli ve Ekleri", İÜİFM, 15/1-4, (İstanbul 1953-1954), s. 251-329.
  4. Dehqan, Mustafa: Index to Sharaf-nama, İstanbul: Nubihar Yayınları 2015.
  5. Demir, Abdullah: "Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu'nun Osmanlı Devletine İltihakı", Köprü Dergisi, 98 (İstanbul 2007), s. 167-182.
  6. Emecen, Feridun M. ve Şahin, İlhan: "Osmanlı Taşra Teşkilatının Kaynaklarından 957- 958 (1550-1551) Tarihli Sancak Tevcîh Defteri", Belgeler: Türk Tarih Belgeleri, 19- 23 (Ankara: 1999), s. 53-120.
  7. Emecen, Feridun: Yavuz Sultan Selim, İstanbul: Yitik Hazine Yayınları 2010.
  8. Genç, Vural: "Acem'den Rum'a": İdris-i Bidlîsî'nin Hayatı, Tarihçiliği ve Heşt Behişt'in II. Bayezid Kısmı (1481-1512), (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi) İstanbul: İstanbul Üni- versitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2014.
  9. Genç, Vural: "Şah ile Sultan Arasında Bir Acem Bürokratı: İdrîs-i Bidlîsî'nin Şah İsmail'in Himayesine Girme Çabası," Osmanlı Araştırmaları, sy. 46 (2015), s. 43-75.
  10. Ghereghlou, Kioumars: "Cashing in on land and privilege for the welfare of the shah: Monetisation of tiyul in early Safavid Iran and eastern Anatolia," Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae,68/1 (Budapest 2015), s. 87-141. Ghiyas al-Din b. Humam al-Din Khvandamir, Habib al-Siyar, IV, Tehran: Intisharat-e Khayyam 1380. Göyünç, Nejat: XVI. Yüzyılda Mardin Sancağı, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları 1991. Hamd-Allah b. Ebibekr b. Muhammad b. Nasr Mustawfi Qazvini, Nuzhat al-Qulub, ed. Muhammad Debir Siyaqi, Tehran 1336. Hoca Sadeddin Efendi, Tâcü't-Tevârîh, II, İstanbul: Tabhâne-i Âmire 1279. Hurshah b. Qubad al-Husayni, Tarikh-e Ilchi-e Nizamshah, ed. Muhammad Reza Nasiri-K. Haneda, Tehran: Anjuman-e Asar va Mafakhir-e Farhangi 1379. İdris-i Bidlîsî, Selim Şah-nâme, nşr. Hi