Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation and Pharmacological Therapy in Patients with Vestibular Migraine

Pages
110–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Patients with predominant vestibular disorders can benefit from VR alone, and patients with combined symptoms (headache and vertigo) can benefit from pharmacologic and rehabilitation therapies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare the results of pharmacologic management options and vestibular rehabilitation (VR) programs in the context of dizziness, balance problems, and headache in patients with vestibular migraine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: DHI scores were significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in all treatment groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Patients with predominant vestibular disorders can benefit from VR alone, and patients with combined symptoms (headache and vertigo) can benefit from pharmacologic and rehabilitation therapies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare the results of pharmacologic management options and vestibular rehabilitation (VR) programs in the context of dizziness, balance problems, and headache in patients with vestibular migraine. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with migraine with vestibular symptoms were evaluated in three groups in the neurology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation and otorhinolaryngology clinics of a medical school hospital. The groups were defined as routine pharmacologic therapy (PT), VR, or both. Patients were evaluated with static posturography, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and the Activities‑Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale as primary outcome measures and symptom frequency and severity (headaches and vertigo attacks) as secondary outcome measures. In‑group and between‑group comparisons were made using relevant statistical methods. Results: DHI scores were significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in all treatment groups. ABC scores increased significantly (P < 0.001) in patients taking PT and those on VR + PT. Posturographic examinations revealed that sway velocity values recorded on foam with eyes closed, which targets vestibular assessment, were significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in groups taking VR either alone or with PT. VR benefited patients with migraine in terms of headaches, vertigo attack frequency, intensity, and duration. Conclusion: Patients with predominant vestibular disorders can benefit from VR alone, and patients with combined symptoms (headache and vertigo) can benefit from pharmacologic and rehabilitation therapies.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, İ., GÖKÇAY, F., KARAPOLAT, H., ERASLAN, S., BİLGEN, C., KİRAZLI, T., TANIGÖR, G., KÖSE, T., ÇELEBİSOY, N. (2020). Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation and Pharmacological Therapy in Patients with Vestibular Migraine. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 110–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/287043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Kayan A, Hood JD. Neuro‑otological manifestations of migraine. Brain 1984;107(Pt 4):1123‑42
  2. Dieterich M, Obermann M, Celebisoy N. Vestibular migraine: The most frequent entity of episodic vertigo. J Neurol 2016;263 Suppl 1:S82‑9
  3. Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, Waterston J, Seemungal B, Carey J, et al. Vestibular migraine: Diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res 2012;22:167‑72
  4. International Headache Society Classification Subcommittee. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38:1‑211
  5. Neuhauser HK, Radtke A, von Brevern M, Feldmann M, Lezius F, Ziese T, et al. Migrainous vertigo: Prevalence and impact on quality of life. Neurology 2006;67:1028‑33
  6. Radtke A, von Brevern M, Neuhauser H, Hottenrott T, Lempert T. Vestibular migraine: Long‑term follow‑up of clinical symptoms and vestibulo‑cochlear findings. Neurology 2012;79:1607‑14
  7. Celebisoy N, Gökçay F, Sirin H, Biçak N. Migrainous vertigo: Clinical, oculographic and posturographic findings. Cephalalgia 2008;28:72‑7
  8. Furman JM, Balaban CD. Vestibular migraine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015;1343:90‑6
  9. Ishiyama A, Jacobson KM, Baloh RW. Migraine and benign positional vertigo. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:377‑80
  10. Furman JM, Marcus DA, Balaban CD. Vestibular migraine: Clinical aspects and pathophysiology. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:706‑15
  11. Fotuhi M, Glaun B, Quan SY, Sofare T. Vestibular migraine: A critical review of treatment trials. J Neurol 2009;256:711‑6
  12. Sohn JH. Recent advances in the understanding of vestibular migraine. Behav Neurol 2016;2016:1801845
  13. Mira E. Improving the quality of life in patients with vestibular disorders: The role of medical treatments and physical rehabilitation. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:109‑14
  14. Karapolat H, Eyigor S, Kirazli Y, Celebisoy N, Bilgen C, Kirazli T. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of Turkish Activities‑specific Balance Confidence Scale in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular disease. Int J Rehabil Res 2010;33:12‑8
  15. Karapolat H, Eyigor S, Kirazlı Y. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of Turkish dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular disease. Int Adv Otol 2009;5:237‑45
  16. Obermann M, Strupp M. Current treatment options in vestibular migraine. Front Neurol 2014;5:257
  17. Bisdorff AR. Management of vestibular migraine. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2011;4:183‑91
  18. Bayer O, Adrion C, Al Tawil, Mansmann A,