Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Barnes-Jewish Hospital stroke dysphagia screen test in patients with acute stroke

Pages
78–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the Turkish version of the BJH-SDS is a valid and reliable instrument when determining dysphagia in patients with acute stroke.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To perform the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Stroke Dysphagia Screen (BJH-SDS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: One hundred forty patients with acute stroke were screened using the BJH-SDS within the first 24 hours of stroke and scored by two blinded independent expert observers, followed by endoscopic evaluations within 24 hours of the screening tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our results suggest that the Turkish version of the BJH-SDS is a valid and reliable instrument when determining dysphagia in patients with acute stroke.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To perform the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Stroke Dysphagia Screen (BJH-SDS). Methods: One hundred forty patients with acute stroke were screened using the BJH-SDS within the first 24 hours of stroke and scored by two blinded independent expert observers, followed by endoscopic evaluations within 24 hours of the screening tests. Cronbach's alpha and item-to-total correlations were used to assess internal consistency. Interrater reliability analyses were performed. Flexible fiber optic endoscopic evaluation of swallow (FEES) was used to describe the validity of the measures. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.20±12.82 years. The internal consistency of the test was good with Cronbach’s α values between 0.831 and 0.894, and there was a very good interrater agreement based on an intra-class correlation coefficient between 0.850 and 1.000. The item-to-total correlation for test items was between 0.493 and 0.712, exceeding the commonly accepted level of >0.3. There was a significant positive association between the total test scores of the raters and FEES levels (r=0.733 p=0.001 and r=0.744, p=0.001).Based on the total scores, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting the presence of dysphagia were 78.6% and 80 to 82.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the Turkish version of the BJH-SDS is a valid and reliable instrument when determining dysphagia in patients with acute stroke.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, Y., KARACA, E. U., SAYLAM, G., YAYLACI, A., ALİCURA, S., ÇOMOĞLU, S. S. (2019). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Barnes-Jewish Hospital stroke dysphagia screen test in patients with acute stroke. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 78–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/286245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke 1999
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 2005
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Ickenstein GW, Höhlig C, Prosiegel M, et al. Prediction of outcome in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia within 72 hours of acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Frieling T. The role of the endoscopist in the stroke unit. Visc Med 2016
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Arnold M, Liesirova K, Broeg-Morvay A, et al. Dysphagia in acute stroke: incidence, burden and impact on clinical outcome. PLoS One 2016
  6. e0148424. [CrossRef] 6. Mourão AM, Lemos SM, Almeida EO, Vicente LC, Teixeira AL. Frequency and factors associated with dysphagia in stroke. Codas 2016
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Fedder WN. Review of evidenced-based nursing protocols for dysphagia assessment. Stroke 2017
  8. e99-e101. [CrossRef] 8. Bax L, McFarlane M, Green E, Miles A. Speech-language pathologist-led fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: functional outcomes for patients after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014
  9. e195-200. [CrossRef] 9. Bours GJ, Speyer R, Lemmens J, Limburg M, de Wit R. Bedside screening tests vs. videofluoroscopy or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Poorjavad M, Jalaie S. Systemic review on highly qualified screening tests for swallowing disorders following stroke: Validity and reliability issues. J Res Med Sci 2014
  11. Ertekin C, Aydogdu I, Yüceyar N, et al. Electrodiagnostic methods for neurogenic dysphagia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Aydogdu I, Kiylioglu N, Tarlaci S, et al. Diagnostic value of “dysphagia limit” for neurogenic dysphagia: 17 years of experience in 1278 adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2015
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Summers D, Leonard A, Wentworth D, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary care of the acute ischemic stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S
  15. Stroke Practice Improvement Network Investigators. Formal dysphagia screening p