Journals / Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

An Evaluation of the Facet Joint Angle Characteristics on the Development of Lumbar Disc Hernia in Young Patients

Pages
229–235
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study did not suggest that facet tropism is a factor in the etiology of LDH.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of the current study was to investigate facet tropism in young patients with lumbar disc hernia (LDH) and the role of facet tropism in the development of LDH.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 57 patients aged 20-32 years with a diagnosis of LDH and bilateral facet joint angles at L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 levels measured on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study did not suggest that facet tropism is a factor in the etiology of LDH.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ldh · fac

Özet

Background: The aim of the current study was to investigate facet tropism in young patients with lumbar disc hernia (LDH) and the role of facet tropism in the development of LDH. Methods: The study included 57 patients aged 20-32 years with a diagnosis of LDH and bilateral facet joint angles at L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 levels measured on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests. In the comparison of the two facet joint angles, a difference of <7° was classified as no tropism, 7°-14° as moderate tropism and >14° as severe tropism. A control group was formed of 46 age-matched healthy individuals with no lumbar disc hernia. Results: A total of 618 facet facet angles were measured, comprising 342 in the 57 patients in the LDH group and 276 in the 46 subjects of the control group. In the LDH group, at the L3-4 level, no tropism was determined in 46 (80.7%), moderate tropism in 9 (15.7%) and severe tropism in 2 (3.5%). At the L4-5 level, no tropism was determined in 36 (63.1%), moderate tropism in 17 (29.8%) and severe tropism in 4 (7%). At the L5-S1 level, no tropism was determined in 33 (57.9%), moderate tropism in 17 (29.8%) and severe tropism in 7 (12.2%).In the control group, at the L3-4 level, no tropism was determined in 40 (87%), moderate tropism in 5 (10.9%) and severe tropism in 1 (2.2%). At the L4-5 level, no tropism was determined in 37 (80.4%), moderate tropism in 8 (17.3%) and severe tropism in 1 (2.1%). At the L5-S1 level, no tropism was determined in 34 (73.9%), moderate tropism in 7 (15.2%) and severe tropism in 5 (10.9%). In the LDH group, the mean facet angle values were 40.4° at L3-4, 42.7° at L4-5 and 45.9° at L5-S1 levels. In the control group, the mean facet angle values were 39.2° at L3-4, 41.4° at L4-5 and 43.9° at L5-S1 levels. Conclusion: Although facet joint tropism was seen at a higher rate in the LDH patients than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The results of the study did not suggest that facet tropism is a factor in the etiology of LDH.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, A., YILMAZ, İ., ESEOĞLU, M. (2018). An Evaluation of the Facet Joint Angle Characteristics on the Development of Lumbar Disc Hernia in Young Patients. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 229–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/286089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Postacchini F, Postacchini R. Operative management of lumbar disc herniation: the evolution of knowledge and surgical techniques in the last century. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011;108:17–21.2. Haidar R, Ghanem I, Saad S, Uthman. Lumbar disc herniation in young children. Acta Pediatr 2010;99:19-23.3. Duc HD, Cyrus ET, Winston F. The relationship between degree of facet tropism and amount of dynamic disc bulge in lumbar spine of patients symptomatic for low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011;20:71–78.4. O’Neill C, Owens DK. Lumbar facet joint pain: time to hit the reset button. Spine 2009;9:619-622.5. Karacan I, Aydin T, Sahin Z, Cidem M, Koyuncu H, Aktas I, et al. Facet angles in lumbar disc herniation: their relation to anthropometirc features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:1132-1136.6. Farfan H, Sullivan J. The relation of facet orientation to intervertebral disc failure. Can J Surg 1967;10:179–185.7. Don AS, Robertson PA. Facet joint orientation in spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. J.Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21:112–115.8. Grogan J, Nowicki BH, Schmidt TA, Haughton VM. Lumbar facet joint tropism does not accelerate degeneration of the facet joints. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1325-1329.9. Ishihara H, Matsui H, Osada R, Ohshima H, Tsuji H. Facet joint asymmetry as a radiologic feature of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in children and adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2001-2004.10. Noren R, Trafimow J, Andersson GB, Huckman MS. The role of facet joint tropism and facet angle in disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:530-532.11. Matsuo Y, Kaito T, Iwasaki M, Sugiura T, Fujimori T, Nagamoto Y, et al. 3D morphometric analysis of laminae and facet joints in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Mod Rheumatol 2015;25:756-760.12. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Ylikoski M, Hurri H, Österman K. Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Spine 1993;18: 894-901.13. Kong MH, He W, Tsai Y, Chen NF, Keorochana G, Do DH. Relationship of Facet Tropism with Degeneration and Stability of Functional Spinal Unit Yonsei Med J 2009;50: 624-629.14. Vanharanta H, Floyd T, Ohnmeiss DD, Hochschuler SH, Guyer RD. The relationship of facet tropism to degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;15;18:1000-1005. 15. Donahue D, Whetsell W. Pathological considerations of the herniated nucleus pulposus. In: Camins and P. Oleary Lumbar Spine. New York: Raven Press, 1987;427-437.16. Hagg O, Wallner A. Facet