SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pediatric Urology Case Reports / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 5

An unusual localization: Preputial hemangioma

Cansu Unden OZCAN
Teoman ÖZCAN
BANU YAMAN
Selçuk YAZICI
Pages
1–4
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The tumor was completely removed surgically and histological examination revealed an infantile hemangioma

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hemangiomas are the most common tumor of infantile period and usually involved sites are head and neck (%50), followed by trunk and extremities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report a 17-months-old patient with a hemangioma of the preputium penis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The tumor was completely removed surgically and histological examination revealed an infantile hemangioma
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hemangiomas are the most common tumor of infantile period and usually involved sites are head and neck (%50), followed by trunk and extremities. Hemangioma is rarely described in genitals. We report a 17-months-old patient with a hemangioma of the preputium penis. The tumor was completely removed surgically and histological examination revealed an infantile hemangioma

🔖

Cite This Article

OZCAN, C. U., ÖZCAN, T., YAMAN, B., YAZICI, S. (2015). An unusual localization: Preputial hemangioma. Pediatric Urology Case Reports, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 5, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/285685

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Haggstrom AN, Garzon MC. Infantile hemangioma. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Scahffer JV. Dermatology. 3 rd ed. Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pp.1691-1709. Hemangioma Investigator Group: Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga E, et al. Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas:demographic, prenatal and perinatal characteristics. J Pediatr. 2007;150(3):291-4.
  2. Lin Y, Sun GH, Yu DS, et al. Intrascrotal hemangioma. Arch Androl. 2002;48(4):259-65.
  3. Ulker V, Esen T. Hemangioma of the glans penis treated with Nd:YAG laser. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(1):95-6.
  4. Kim CJ, Okada Y, Konishi T, Kounami T, Pak K, Tomoyoshi T, et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the penis: report of a case immunohistochemically Kilitci et al / Ped Urol Case Rep 2015;2(5):5-9 studied. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1990; 36(9):1085-8.
  5. Senoh H, Ichiwaka Y, Okuyama A, Takaha M, Sonoda T. Cavernous hemangioma of scrotum and penile shaft. Urol Int. 1986;41(4):309-11.
  6. Santos E, Sarma D. Hemangioma of the Prepuce. The Internet Journal of Dermatology. 2006;4(1):1. Margileth AM, Museles M. Cutaneous hemangiomas in children: Diagnosis and conservative management. JAMA. 1965;194(5):523-6.
  7. Casale AJ, Menashe DS. Massive strawberry hemangioma of the male genitalia. J Urol. 1989;141(3):593-4.
  8. Yildirim I, Irkilata C, Sumer F, Aydur E, Ozcan A, Dayanc M. Fibroepithelial polyp originating from the glans penis in a child. Int J Urol. 2004;11(3):187-8.
  9. Smithers C.J, Fishman S.J.Vascular anomalies. In:Aschraft K.W, Holcomb G.W, Murphy J.P. Pediatric Surgery. 4th ed. Elsevier/Saunders; 2005.pp.1038-1053.