Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

The prediction level of high school studens' learning styles on critical thinking dispositions

Lise öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerini yordama düzeyi

Pages
83–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that while high school students learning styles (systematically study, dependence on teachers and cooperation in classroom) predict significantly causal thinking, courisity and openmindedness dispositions, competitive learning style does not predict significantly the critical thinking dispositions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is a predictive effect of learning styles on critical thinking dispositions of high school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study is composed of 271 high school students chosen randomly from three high schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that while high school students learning styles (systematically study, dependence on teachers and cooperation in classroom) predict significantly causal thinking, courisity and openmindedness dispositions, competitive learning style does not predict significantly the critical thinking dispositions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is a predictive effect of learning styles on critical thinking dispositions of high school students. Thus, it aims to determine how much of learning styles used by high school students depending on the nature of learning settings explain the variance in critical thinking dispositions. The sample of the study is composed of 271 high school students chosen randomly from three high schools. The data was collected using Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale developed by reseachers and Learning Styles Scale developed by Reichmann-Grasha and adapted into Turkish language by Koçak (2007). The findings indicated that while high school students learning styles (systematically study, dependence on teachers and cooperation in classroom) predict significantly causal thinking, courisity and openmindedness dispositions, competitive learning style does not predict significantly the critical thinking dispositions.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, lise öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerini yordayıcı etkisinin olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla lise öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerini ne oranda açıkladığının belirlenmesi hedeflenmektedir. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Uşak ilinde orta öğretim kurumlarından tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi ile üç liseden seçilen 271 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri Ölçeği ve Grasha-Reichmann tarafından geliştirilen ve Koçak (2007) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Öğrenme Stilleri Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, lise öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerinden sistemli çalışma eğilimi, öğretmene bağımlılık ve sınıf içi işbirliği stillerinin nedensellik, meraklılık ve açık fikirlilik eğilimlerini anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığı, rekabetçi öğrenme stilinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerinin hiç birisini yordamadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEL, C., ULUÇINAR, U. (2013). The prediction level of high school studens' learning styles on critical thinking dispositions. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 83–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/285292

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agarwal, R. ve Jaiswal, D. (2010). Learning style preferences of adolescents in relation to their mental ability. Journal of Educational Research, 13 (2), 108-113.
  2. Ahmad, N. A., Jelas, Z. M. ve Ali, M. M. (2011). The relationship between learning styles and strategies with academic achievement based on gender and type of school. The International Journal of Learning, 17 (10), 265-278.
  3. An, G. J. ve Yoo, M. S. (2008). Exploring the relationship between learning style and critical thinking in an online course. Contemporary Nurse Journal, 29 (1), 100-109.
  4. Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. ve Daniels, L.B. (1999). Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31 (3), 285-302.
  5. Baum, L. M. ve Newbill, P. L. (2010). Instructional design as critical and creative thinking: A journey through a Jamestown-Era Native American Village. TechTrends, 54 (5), 27-37.
  6. Berry, T. ve Settle, A. (2011). Learning style preferences. International Journal of Education Research, 6 (1), 1-8.
  7. Beşoluk, Ş. ve Önder, İ. (2010). Investigation of teacher candidates' learning approaches, learning styles and critical thinking dispositions. Elementary Education Online, 9 (2), 679-693.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (3.Baskı). Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Chen, Y., Cheng, Y., Liu, K. ve Tsai, H. (2009). Development of the critical thinking disposition inventory. The 74th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, University of Cambridge. Chinn, C. A. ve Chinn, L. M. (2009). Collaborative Learning. Eric M. Anderman ve Lynley H. Anderman (Eds.), Pschology of Classroom Learning: An Encyclopedia. USA: Macmillan Social Science Library. Cole, S. (1999). Sosyolojik Düşünme Yöntemi (Bekir Demirkol, Çev.). Ankara:
  10. Vadi Yayınları.
  11. Colucciello, M. L. (1999). Relationships between critical thinking dispositions and learning styles. Journal Proffesionals Nursing. 15 (5), 294-301. D’Angelo, C. M., Touchman, S. ve Clark, D. B. (2009). Construcitivism: Overview. Eric M. Anderman ve Lynley H. Anderman (Eds.), Pschology of Classroom Learning: An Encyclopedia. USA: Macmillan Social Science Library. Dunn, R. (2000). Capitalizing on College Students’ Learning Styles: Theory, Practice, and Research. Rita Dunn ve Shirley A. Griggs (Eds.), Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education. London: Bergin & Garvey. Duron, R., Limbach, B. ve Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline.