Journals / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

LESS hysterectomy through a bluntly created 11 mmincision

Pages
76–79
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We illustrate the technique in the accompanying video and believe the technique to be safe and reproducible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the field of minimally invasive surgery, there is a constant drive to devise and execute the most minimally invasive surgeries possible.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After researching the literature, we were not able to find any single port hysterectomies performed through a port size of smaller than 15 mm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We illustrate the technique in the accompanying video and believe the technique to be safe and reproducible.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the field of minimally invasive surgery, there is a constant drive to devise and execute the most minimally invasive surgeries possible. By the very nature of laparoscopy and robotic surgery, what one can accomplish with several ports of a given size will invariably be studied and attempted with fewer ports and with ports of smaller sizes. After researching the literature, we were not able to find any single port hysterectomies performed through a port size of smaller than 15 mm. We were able to perform, described here, a technique for performing laparoscopic hysterectomy through a single port of only 11 mm in diameter. We illustrate the technique in the accompanying video and believe the technique to be safe and reproducible.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARCHAND, G. J., AZADİ, A., ANDERSON, S., RUTHER, S., HOPEWELL, S., BRAZİL, G., SAİNZ, K., WOLF, H., KİNG, A., VALLEJEO, J., WARE, K., CİEMİNSKİ, K., GALİTSKY, A. (2022). LESS hysterectomy through a bluntly created 11 mmincision. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 76–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/284906

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Langebrekke A, Qvigstad E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with single-port access without vaginal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16: 609-11
  2. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason SU, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 2004; 328: 129
  3. Behnia-Willison F, Foroughinia L, Sina M, McChesney P. Singleincision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in gynaecology: feasibility and operative outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52: 366-70
  4. Song T, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yoon BS, Joo WD, Seong SJ. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 317.e1-9
  5. Demir RH, Marchand GJ. SELS: Laparoscopic oophorectomy, bagging and vaginal morcellation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: S114
  6. Cela V, Marrucci E, Angioni S, Freschi L. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy. Minerva Ginecol 2018. doi: 10.23736/S0026-478104197-7