Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Using Videos in ESL Listening Achievement Tests: Effects on Difficulty

Pages
67–91
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings are discussed in terms oftheir practical significance for ESL teachers as well as theoretical implications for the field of ESLlistening assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The question as to whether an assessment construct of second language (L2) listening comprehensionshould include the decoding of visual information remains unanswered (see Buck, 2001; Ockey, 2007).This study aimed to fill this gap by investigating how audio-only and video-enhanced delivery formats oflistening passages compared in terms of difficulty for English as a second language (ESL) students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Itutilized students’ performance on listening achievement tests developed by the researcher.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings are discussed in terms oftheir practical significance for ESL teachers as well as theoretical implications for the field of ESLlistening assessment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Audio · second language · listening test

Abstract

The question as to whether an assessment construct of second language (L2) listening comprehensionshould include the decoding of visual information remains unanswered (see Buck, 2001; Ockey, 2007).This study aimed to fill this gap by investigating how audio-only and video-enhanced delivery formats oflistening passages compared in terms of difficulty for English as a second language (ESL) students. Itutilized students’ performance on listening achievement tests developed by the researcher. Theparticipants were 60 low- and high-proficiency ESL students enrolled in an American intensive Englishprogram. The participants’ scores on the achievement tests were used to compare the difficulty of items ofdifferent formats and determine whether this difficulty related to video type (context versus content) andstudents’ proficiency level. The findings suggested that, at least for higher-level students, listeningtestlets enhanced with videos containing mostly content-related visuals were significantly easier thantheir audio-only counterparts were. On the contrary, the inclusion of videos with mostly context visualsdid not affect the difficulty of testlets in any proficiency category. The findings are discussed in terms oftheir practical significance for ESL teachers as well as theoretical implications for the field of ESLlistening assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

LESNOV, R. O. (2017). Using Videos in ESL Listening Achievement Tests: Effects on Difficulty. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 67–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/284875

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507–531.
  2. Batty, A. O. (2015). A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning. Language Testing, 32, 3-20. http://doi.org/b4s9
  3. Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., Nissan, S., & Turner, J. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 19). Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-00-07.pdf
  4. Buck, G. (2001).
  5. Assessing listening. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Chan, C., Wang, L., & Xu, L. (2014). A study of video effect of English listening comprehension. Studies in Literature and Language, 8, 53-58. http://doi.org/b4tb Copyright Law of the United States and Related Laws Contained in title 17 of the United States Code. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf
  7. Cubilo, J., & Winke, P. (2013). Redefining the L2 listening construct within an integrated writing task: Considering the impacts of visual-cue interpretation and note-taking. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10, 371–397. http://doi.org/b4tc
  8. Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19, 133–167. http://doi.org/b9kst8
  9. Gruba, P. (1993). A comparison study of audio and video in language testing. JALT Journal, 15, 85–88.
  10. Gruba, P. (2004). Understanding digitized second language videotext. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 51-82. http://doi.org/d8jx2b
  11. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Lado, R. (1961). Language Testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman. Latifi, M., Tavakoli, M., & A’lipour, J. (2013). Investigating the effect of video materials on testing foreign language learners’ listening performance. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13, 1197-1201. Retrieved from https://www.idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr13(9)13/11.pdf
  13. Londe, Z. C. (2009). The effects of video media in English as a second language listening comprehension test. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 17, 41-50. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0c080191#page-1
  14. Mendelsohn, D. J. (1994). Learning to listen: A strategy-based approach for the second language learner. SanDiego: Dominie Press.
  15. Ockey, G. J. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-ba